Robustness of IR Models to Collection Growth

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23419v2
• Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:45:03 GMT
• Title: Robustness of IR Models to Collection Growth
• Abstract summary: This study formalises the concept and empirically evaluates it by merging two collections with negligible topic overlap.<n>We hypothesise that the way an IR model conditions its ranking on other documents in a collection plays an important role in its robustness to the addition of non-relevant documents.<n>Our results show that neither MDD nor MDA models are fully robust to the addition of non-relevant documents, as all models exhibit some performance degradation.
• Score: 25.464465023775627
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Information Retrieval (IR) systems seek to identify relevant documents within a collection. In practical applications, collections are dynamic, with documents frequently added. We argue that ideally, a retriever's effectiveness should not decrease when non-relevant documents are added to a collection. This study formalises this concept and empirically evaluates it by merging two collections with negligible topic overlap. We hypothesise that the way an IR model conditions its ranking on other documents in a collection (e.g., the IDF component in BM25 or contextual documents in listwise rerankers) plays an important role in its robustness to the addition of non-relevant documents. We broadly classify models as those that do not depend on other documents (Multi-Document-Agnostic, MDA) and those that do (Multi-Document-Dependent, MDD). Our results show that neither MDD nor MDA models are fully robust to the addition of non-relevant documents, as all models exhibit some performance degradation. Interestingly, among the models we test, MDA is more effective than MDD for retrieval, whereas MDD and MDA rerankers are equally effective.

Related papers

• Improved Evidence Extraction for Document Inconsistency Detection with LLMs [10.610567456326235]
  We introduce new comprehensive evidence-extraction metrics and a redact-and-retry framework with constrained filtering.<n>We back our claims with promising experimental results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T00:58:20Z)
• Improving Document Retrieval Coherence for Semantically Equivalent Queries [63.97649988164166]
  We propose a variation of the Multi-Negative Ranking loss for training DR that improves the coherence of models in retrieving the same documents.<n>The loss penalizes discrepancies between the top-k ranked documents retrieved for diverse but semantic equivalent queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T13:34:59Z)
• Docopilot: Improving Multimodal Models for Document-Level Understanding [87.60020625241178]
  We present a high-quality document-level dataset, Doc-750K, designed to support in-depth understanding of multimodal documents.<n>This dataset includes diverse document structures, extensive cross-page dependencies, and real question-answer pairs derived from the original documents.<n>Building on the dataset, we develop a native multimodal model, Docopilot, which can accurately handle document-level dependencies without relying on RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T16:03:34Z)
• A Unified Retrieval Framework with Document Ranking and EDU Filtering for Multi-document Summarization [18.13855430873805]
  Current methods apply truncation after the retrieval process to fit the context length.<n>We propose a novel retrieval-based framework that integrates query selection and document ranking.<n>We evaluate our framework on multiple MDS datasets, demonstrating consistent improvements in ROUGE metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T13:41:10Z)
• Collapse of Dense Retrievers: Short, Early, and Literal Biases Outranking Factual Evidence [56.09494651178128]
  Retrieval models are commonly used in Information Retrieval (IR) applications, such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>We quantify the impact of biases, such as a preference for shorter documents, on retrievers like Dragon+ and Contriever.<n>We uncover major vulnerabilities, showing retrievers favor shorter documents, early positions, repeated entities, and literal matches, all while ignoring the answer's presence!
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T23:23:13Z)
• ODSum: New Benchmarks for Open Domain Multi-Document Summarization [30.875191848268347]
  Open-domain Multi-Document Summarization (ODMDS) is a critical tool for condensing vast arrays of documents into coherent, concise summaries. We propose a rule-based method to process query-based document summarization datasets into ODMDS datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T11:27:34Z)
• Open Domain Multi-document Summarization: A Comprehensive Study of Model Brittleness under Retrieval [42.73076855699184]
  Multi-document summarization (MDS) assumes a set of topic-related documents are provided as input. We study this more challenging setting by formalizing the task and bootstrapping it using existing datasets, retrievers and summarizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:41:38Z)
• Document-Level Relation Extraction with Sentences Importance Estimation and Focusing [52.069206266557266]
  Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to determine the relation between two entities from a document of multiple sentences. We propose a Sentence Estimation and Focusing (SIEF) framework for DocRE, where we design a sentence importance score and a sentence focusing loss. Experimental results on two domains show that our SIEF not only improves overall performance, but also makes DocRE models more robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T03:20:07Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)
• Augmenting Document Representations for Dense Retrieval with Interpolation and Perturbation [49.940525611640346]
  Document Augmentation for dense Retrieval (DAR) framework augments the representations of documents with their Dense Augmentation and perturbations. We validate the performance of DAR on retrieval tasks with two benchmark datasets, showing that the proposed DAR significantly outperforms relevant baselines on the dense retrieval of both the labeled and unlabeled documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T09:07:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.