AgentRoom: Concurrent Multi-Agent Coding in a CRDT-Backed Shared Workspace
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23740v1
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:28:33 GMT
- Title: AgentRoom: Concurrent Multi-Agent Coding in a CRDT-Backed Shared Workspace
- Abstract summary: AgentRoom is a realtime collaborative editing protocol for concurrent coding agents.<n>It exposes file-level claim, status, and broadcast as MCP tools on a CRDT-merged layer.<n>For CLI-stable models, AgentRoom with 2 agents abandons fewer tasks than Solo and has less run-to-run variation.
- Score: 2.650689617442372
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Concurrent multi-agent coding promises division of labor across modules, robustness through redundancy, and parallel exploration at the natural granularity of multi-file projects. Realtime collaborative editing protocols solve this coordination problem for human teams via Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs), but the LLMs underneath generate one token at a time and existing multi-agent coding systems inherit this serial limit: they either sequence agents through phase handoffs or pool independent samples without coordination, and a single agent abandons up to half of hard tasks with a one-file stub-and-exit. AgentRoom is a realtime collaborative editing protocol for concurrent coding agents. Its runtime layer exposes file-level claim, status, and broadcast as MCP tools on a CRDT-merged shared filesystem. Five frontier coding-CLI models ran four backend coding tasks, with cross-language checks in Python DevBench and Rust+axum. For CLI-stable models, AgentRoom with 2 agents abandons fewer tasks than Solo and has less run-to-run variation. At matched-compute, one positive mean LLM-judge contrast puts AgentRoom over parallel-merge. The other contrast, a bundle probe, puts full AgentRoom above each partial case: an ordering rather than a percentage split. Coordination, not parallelism or CRDT-merge, bears the load.
Related papers
- FRAMEWORKERS: A Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for AI-Generated Video Production [55.71860113185132]
We introduce FRAMEWORKERS, a task-centric and workspace-grounded multi-agent framework for open-ended video production.<n>A central Director formulates video creation as dynamic task management, continuously editing a Task Stack to determine which subtask to execute next and which sub-agent to invoke.<n>An Assistant serves as the execution layer, grounding each selected task in a shared Workspace, retrieving the required assets and context, invoking the assigned sub-agent, and persisting the resulting artifacts.<n>Experiments show that FRAMEWORKERS outperforms strong planners in routing accuracy, recovers reliably from runtime failures, generalizes to unseen sub
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-30T14:28:50Z) - AgentPatch: Coarse-to-Fine Weak-Task Repair for Merging Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models [22.004098225093177]
AgentPatch is a training-free coarse-to-fine repair framework for agentic large language models.<n>It selects a stable merged backbone, restores diluted weak-task-specific signals through Weak-Task Unique Residual Recovery, and applies an Agent-Guided Behavior-Critical Patch.<n>AgentPatch produces a single static checkpoint without routing or ensembles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-07T01:52:45Z) - Training Small LLMs as Spatial Multi-Agent Policies [17.254137262162505]
We take up both threads in spatial cooperative games, where small frozen LLMs prompt with low-level actions fail outright, earning zero reward.<n>We equip each game with a library of symbolic emphoptions: typed, state-feasible, short-horizon behaviors executed by a symbolic planner.<n>Each agent's LLM acts as its policy over options, with a private per-agent LoRA adapter trained by a per-agent variant of multi-agent GRPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-02T18:14:40Z) - Tencent WorkBuddy Bench: A Multi-Domain Coding-Agent Benchmark with Contamination-Resistant Task Construction [57.138342889101345]
Tencent WorkBuddy Bench is a multi-domain evaluation suite for coding agents.<n>This report documents its construction methodology, scoring protocol, and a cross-model leaderboard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-23T04:34:06Z) - CoAgent: Concurrency Control for Multi-Agent Systems [3.127039011380953]
This paper builds control on a capability classical transactions lack.<n>It fixes a serialization order at launch, serves each read the order-filtered value, and applies writes speculatively in place.<n>It grows a 25-tool library online and lifts the task pass rate from 45/71 to 63/71 at $0.80times$ the time and $0.86times$ the cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-13T16:15:14Z) - Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents [48.1363632826625]
Alem embeds procedurally generated coordination tasks, soft specialisation, communication, and controllable coordination difficulty into a long-horizon survival world.<n>We introduce $alem$, a JAX-based benchmark for open-ended multi-agent coordination built on Craftax-like dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-06T21:13:43Z) - Multi-Agent Computer Use [72.79887808312706]
We argue that we should move towards evaluating and building multi-agent computer use (MACU) systems.<n>We propose a general multi-agent setup in which a manager model decomposes computer use tasks as a directed acyclic graph (DAG)<n>At each iteration, the manager dispatches parallel CUA subagents to carry out nodes on the ready frontier of the DAG.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-01T01:29:36Z) - Multi-agent Collaboration with State Management [21.19345862774123]
When multiple agents edit a shared concurrently, their changes can silently conflict and inconsistent views lead to integration failures.<n>Existing multi-agent systems address this through workspace isolation (e.g., one git worktree per agent)<n>We propose STORM, i.e., STate-ORiented Management for multi-agent collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T23:45:33Z) - Improving the Efficiency of Language Agent Teams with Adaptive Task Graphs [52.26652574704317]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in teams, yet existing coordination approaches often occupy two extremes.<n>We introduce Language Agent Teams for Task Evolution (LATTE), a framework for coordinating LLM teams inspired by distributed systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T14:19:17Z) - Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agents [52.76455094324273]
We introduce a structured multi-agent coordination paradigm grounded in three core SWE primitives: centralized task delegation, asynchronous execution, and isolated workspaces.<n>We find that CAID improves accuracy over single-agent baselines by 26.7% absolute on paper reproduction tasks (PaperBench) and 14.3% on Python library development tasks (Commit0).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T02:26:35Z) - Interpretable Context Methodology: Folder Structure as Agentic Architecture [0.0]
Current approaches to AI agent orchestration typically involve building multi-agent frameworks that manage context passing, memory, error handling, and step coordination through code.<n>This paper presents Model Workspace Protocol (MWP), a method that replaces framework-level orchestration with structure.<n>Plain markdown files carry the prompts and context that tell a single AI agent what role to play at each step. Local scripts handle the mechanical work that does not need AI at all.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T00:03:23Z) - Behavior Knowledge Merge in Reinforced Agentic Models [48.89546963456286]
Reinforcement learning is central to post-training, particularly for agentic models that require specialized reasoning behaviors.<n>Existing merging methods are designed for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and they are suboptimal to preserve task-specific capabilities on RL-trained agentic models.<n>We propose Reinforced Agent Merging (RAM), a distribution-aware merging framework explicitly designed for RL-trained agentic models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T03:56:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.