Quantum Algorithms and Hardness for Point-Count Approximation over Finite Fields

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23929v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:23:27 GMT
• Title: Quantum Algorithms and Hardness for Point-Count Approximation over Finite Fields
• Abstract summary: We study the approximation of the number of solutions of Laurentrms over finite fields.<n>Our first main result is a quantum algorithm that outputs $widehat(f)$ satisfying [ |widehatN(f) - N(f)| le varepsilon qn+s/2- ] with success probability $1-$.<n>As a second main result, we prove that the same problem becomes $#$P-hard under randomized-time Turing reductions.
• Score: 1.4323566945483497
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study the approximation of the number of solutions of Laurent polynomials over finite fields. For a Laurent polynomial \[f(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{s}a_jx^{u_j}\in \mathbb{F}_q[x_1^{\pm1},\ldots,x_n^{\pm1}], \] let $U$ be its augmented support matrix whose columns are $(1,u_j)$ with rank $ρ$ and $N(f) := \# \{x\in (\mathbb{F}_q^\times)^n \mid f(x)=0\}$ be its torus point count. Our first main result is a quantum algorithm that outputs $\widehat{N}(f)$ satisfying \[ |\widehat{N}(f) - N(f)| \le \varepsilon q^{n+s/2-ρ} \] with success probability $1-δ$. Provided that $ρ$ and $\|U\|_\infty$ are bounded, the algorithm runs in both classical bit and quantum gate complexity $\mathrm{poly}(n, s, \log q, 1/\varepsilon, \log(1/δ))$. It provides finer resolution than relative-error approximations in general settings. To the best of our knowledge, in the explicit finite-field input model considered here, no previous algorithm achieves this additive accuracy with running time polynomial in $\log q$. Van Dam (arXiv:quant-ph/0405081) conjectured the existence of such an algorithm under the assumption of an oracle reflecting the algebraic properties of the polynomial. In contrast, by exploiting a point-counting formula derived from character sums over finite fields, we develop an alternative approach that efficiently approximates the number of points without assuming the existence of such an oracle. As a second main result, we prove that the same approximation problem becomes $\#$P-hard under randomized polynomial-time Turing reductions when the support matrix $U$ varies freely as part of the input. Thus, taken together, our results clarify how the effectiveness of the quantum approach depends on the tradeoff between the accuracy scale and the support parameters of the input polynomial.

Related papers

• A Sharp Barrier for Consistent Submodular Maximization: Any Improvement over $2-\sqrt{2}$ Entails Exponential Queries or Linear Recourse [50.69285844345291]
  We study tradeoff between solution quality and stability when elements arrive over time.<n>Our algorithm has a future implementation for rational oracle$ with $O(varepsilon-1)$ recourse and separate the existence of universal-price certificates from their efficient algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T10:13:43Z)
• Optimal inequalities for completely bounded polynomials and the limitations of quantum query algorithms [0.764671395172401]
  We consider the problem of establishing limitations on the power of quantum query algorithms via the completely bounded method.<n>We prove several optimal functional inequalities involving different notions of completely boundeds.<n>These inequalities lead to limitings for the power of quantum query algorithms that improve on prior works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-04T14:34:56Z)
• Faster quantum linear system solver beyond the condition number [50.84794327094274]
  We present two quantum algorithms that produce the normalized solution $|xrangle$ of linear system $Ax=| b rangle$ to accuracy $$ with complexity independent of the condition number $=lVert A-1rVert$.<n>Our filtering-based solver is extremely simple with a favorable runtime prefactor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T17:49:40Z)
• Algorithms with Polynomially-Improved Approximation Factors for the $2 \rightarrow q$ Norm, and Applications [13.39372872460586]
  The $2 rightarrow q$ norm of a matrix $X in mathbbRn times d$ is defined as $lVert X rVert_2 rightarrow q = sup_lVert v rVert = 1 lVert Xv rVert_q$.<n>We show that a simple spectral algorithm can achieve an approximation factor better than $2sqrtlog n$, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (FOCS'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T23:56:06Z)
• Hardness of High-Dimensional Linear Classification [58.29089693778071]
  We establish new exponential in dimension lower bounds for the Maximum Halfspace Discrepancy problem.<n>Both are fundamental problems in computational geometry and machine learning in their exact and approximate forms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T15:53:41Z)
• Spectral Gaps with Quantum Counting Queries and Oblivious State Preparation [47.600794349481966]
  In this work, we present a quantum algorithm which approximates values up to additive error $epsilonDelta_k$ using a logarithmic number of qubits.<n>A key technical step in the analysis is the preparation of a suitable random initial state, which ultimately allows us to efficiently count the number of eigenvalues that are smaller than a threshold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T17:04:18Z)
• Quantum and classical query complexities of functions of matrices [0.0]
  We show that for any continuous function $f(x):[-1,1]rightarrow [-1,1]$, the quantum query complexity of computing $brai f(A) ketjpm varepsilon/4$ is lower bounded by $Omega(widetildedeg_varepsilon(f))$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T00:45:41Z)
• The Approximate Degree of DNF and CNF Formulas [95.94432031144716]
  For every $delta>0,$ we construct CNF and formulas of size with approximate degree $Omega(n1-delta),$ essentially matching the trivial upper bound of $n. We show that for every $delta>0$, these models require $Omega(n1-delta)$, $Omega(n/4kk2)1-delta$, and $Omega(n/4kk2)1-delta$, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T10:01:39Z)
• Learning a Single Neuron with Adversarial Label Noise via Gradient Descent [50.659479930171585]
  We study a function of the form $mathbfxmapstosigma(mathbfwcdotmathbfx)$ for monotone activations. The goal of the learner is to output a hypothesis vector $mathbfw$ that $F(mathbbw)=C, epsilon$ with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T17:55:43Z)
• Low-degree learning and the metric entropy of polynomials [44.99833362998488]
  We prove that any (deterministic or randomized) algorithm which learns $mathscrF_nd$ with $L$-accuracy $varepsilon$ requires at least $Omega(sqrtvarepsilon)2dlog n leq log mathsfM(mathscrF_n,d,|cdot|_L,varepsilon) satisfies the two-sided estimate $$c (1-varepsilon)2dlog
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T23:52:08Z)
• Small Covers for Near-Zero Sets of Polynomials and Learning Latent Variable Models [56.98280399449707]
  We show that there exists an $epsilon$-cover for $S$ of cardinality $M = (k/epsilon)O_d(k1/d)$. Building on our structural result, we obtain significantly improved learning algorithms for several fundamental high-dimensional probabilistic models hidden variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:14:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.