AI-Ready Research Workflows in Computational Social Science: Lessons on Building a Shared Language for Interdisciplinary Collaboration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24914v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 09:02:41 GMT
• Title: AI-Ready Research Workflows in Computational Social Science: Lessons on Building a Shared Language for Interdisciplinary Collaboration
• Abstract summary: We report on a two-year effort to build a workflow that enables a Science and Technology Studies unit to query, analyze, and enrich OpenAlex.<n>We found the main challenge was translating domain-specific research questions into engineering requirements.
• Score: 31.33731311675717
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). However, adoption remains limited by technical barriers to high-performance computing (HPC), validation processes that lag behind AI's rapid progress, and reproducibility standards that most SSH teams cannot meet. Research workflows--common in the life sciences--address these problems via encoding and abstracting technical complexity into repeatable routines; yet, accounts of how to build them in SSH remain scarce. We report on a two-year effort to build a workflow that enables a Science and Technology Studies unit to query, analyze, and enrich OpenAlex--a database of some 460 million scholarly records--on the MareNostrum supercomputer, using methods ranging from large-scale bibliometrics to LLM-based classification. We found the main challenge was translating domain-specific research questions into engineering requirements -- bridging two distinct methodological languages, with implications that were both organizational and technical. Organizationally, it meant adopting and adapting Agile to the research rhythm and pace, and reframing collaboration from a service arrangement to a co-design process. Technically, model-driven engineering was as valuable for collaboration as it was for automation; co-building the model facilitated both the creation of a shared vocabulary and the abstraction of HPC complexity. Finally, we highlight limitations we found in validation, reproducibility, and FAIR metadata -- beyond what any single project can sustain -- calling for coordinated, cross-institutional investment in the tooling and standards needed for AI-ready SSH workflows sustainable at scale.

Related papers

• GENESIS: Harnessing AI Agents for Autonomous 6G RAN Synthesis, Research, and Testing [13.436656977622691]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have compressed comparable R&D work in general software engineering from days to minutes.<n>We present GENESIS, an agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) framework that converts intents into solutions validated with over-the-air experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T17:58:43Z)
• Advances and Frontiers of LLM-based Issue Resolution in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Survey [59.3507264893654]
  Issue resolution is a complex Software Engineering task integral to real-world development.<n> benchmarks like SWE-bench revealed this task as profoundly difficult for large language models.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of this emerging domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T18:55:03Z)
• Towards AI-Supported Research: a Vision of the TIB AIssistant [6.36260975777314]
  We present the vision of the TIB AIssistant, a domain-agnostic human-machine collaborative platform designed to support researchers across disciplines in scientific discovery.<n>We describe the conceptual framework, system architecture, and implementation of an early prototype that demonstrates the feasibility and potential impact of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T12:08:46Z)
• AI Sprints: Towards a Critical Method for Human-AI Collaboration [0.0]
  This article introduces the possibility for new forms of humanistic inquiry through what I term 'AI sprints'<n>I demonstrate how tight loops of iterative development can adapt data and book sprint methodologies whilst acknowledging the profound transformations generative AI introduces.<n>The paper contributes both a practical methodology for intensive AI-augmented research and a theoretical framework for understanding the transformations of this hybrid method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-13T15:56:11Z)
• Accelerating scientific discovery with the common task framework [48.92654976046941]
  Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are transforming the characterization and control of dynamic systems in the engineering, physical, and biological sciences.<n>These emerging modeling paradigms require comparative metrics to evaluate a diverse set of scientific objectives.<n>We introduce a common task framework (CTF) for science and engineering, which features a growing collection of challenge data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T02:53:07Z)
• WebResearcher: Unleashing unbounded reasoning capability in Long-Horizon Agents [72.28593628378991]
  WebResearcher is an iterative deep-research paradigm that reformulates deep research as a Markov Decision Process.<n>WebResearcher achieves state-of-the-art performance, even surpassing frontier proprietary systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T17:57:17Z)
• Large Language Models for Orchestrating Bimanual Robots [19.60907949776435]
  We present LAnguage-model-based Bimanual ORchestration (LABOR) to analyze task configurations and devise coordination control policies. We evaluate our method through simulated experiments involving two classes of long-horizon tasks using the NICOL humanoid robot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T15:08:35Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for AI & ML [79.22051549519989]
  Development of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. Engineering systems follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. We propose a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T17:14:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.