From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25605v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 10:24:31 GMT
• Title: From Specialization to Generalization: Instruction-tuned LLMs for Robust Harmful Content Mitigation
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance across a wide range of general NLP tasks.<n>However, their effectiveness in sensitive domains, such as hate speech detection, remains less clear.<n>In this work, we revisit this question through the lens of instruction tuning.
• Score: 55.450840345528235
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance across a wide range of general NLP tasks; however, their effectiveness in sensitive domains, such as hate speech detection, remains less clear. Prior studies comparing prompted LLMs with state-of-the-art encoder-based models (e.g., BERT variants (Roy et al., 2023; Dönmez et al., 2024)) have shown only marginal gains, suggesting that LLMs may not excel in hate speech detection or mitigation. In this work, we revisit this question through the lens of instruction tuning. By thoroughly unifying 36 English hate speech datasets spanning multiple labeling schemes, we fine-tune a generalist LLM, based on Qwen3 (Qwen Team, 2025), specifically for hate speech mitigation. Our results demonstrate not only state-of-the-art performance on in-domain benchmarks but also substantial improvements in cross-domain and cross-lingual generalization--areas where encoder-based specialist classifiers often struggle.

Related papers

• DRES: Benchmarking LLMs for Disfluency Removal [27.083825614818135]
  Disfluencies, such as "um," "uh," interjections, parentheticals, and edited statements, remain a persistent challenge for speech-driven systems.<n>Disfluency Removal Evaluation Suite, a controlled text-level benchmark, establishes a reproducible semantic upper bound for this task.<n>DRES builds on human-annotated Switchboard transcripts, isolating disfluency removal from ASR errors and acoustic variability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T17:08:12Z)
• Enhancing Generalization of Speech Large Language Models with Multi-Task Behavior Imitation and Speech-Text Interleaving [36.246791887458194]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable generalization across tasks.<n>LLMs typically use supervised fine-tuning to align speech with text-based LLMs.<n>We propose a novel multi-task 'behavior imitation' method with speech-text interleaving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T11:09:13Z)
• Forget What You Know about LLMs Evaluations -- LLMs are Like a Chameleon [12.13060272830352]
  Large language models (LLMs) often appear to excel on public benchmarks.<n>These high scores may mask an overreliance on dataset-specific surface cues rather than true language understanding.<n>We introduce the Chameleon Benchmark Overfit Detector (C-BOD), a meta-evaluation framework that distorts benchmark prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T10:43:36Z)
• Efficient Real-time Refinement of Language Model Text Generation [65.1937138219008]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of natural language tasks.<n>A critical challenge remains in that they sometimes generate factually incorrect answers.<n>We propose Streaming-VR, a novel approach designed to enhance the efficiency of verification and refinement of LLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T03:59:48Z)
• Exploring Language Model Generalization in Low-Resource Extractive QA [57.14068405860034]
  We investigate Extractive Question Answering (EQA) with Large Language Models (LLMs) under domain drift.<n>We devise a series of experiments to explain the performance gap empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T05:06:43Z)
• Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models [104.18157036880287]
  We investigate the role of semantic representations in the era of large language models (LLMs) We propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method, which we call AMRCoT. We find that it is difficult to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on, but errors tend to arise with multi-word expressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:32:59Z)
• The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM) We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions. Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z)
• Can we obtain significant success in RST discourse parsing by using Large Language Models? [32.94244684710954]
  decoder-only large language models (LLMs) have significantly impacted a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This paper explores how beneficial such LLMs are for Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) discourse parsing. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets, RST-DT, Instr-DT, and the GUM corpus, demonstrate that Llama 2 with 70 billion parameters in the bottom-up strategy obtained state-of-the-art results with significant differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T05:34:29Z)
• Don't Go To Extremes: Revealing the Excessive Sensitivity and Calibration Limitations of LLMs in Implicit Hate Speech Detection [29.138463029748547]
  This paper explores the capability of Large Language Models to detect implicit hate speech and express confidence in their responses. Our findings highlight that LLMs exhibit two extremes: (1) LLMs display excessive sensitivity towards groups or topics that may cause fairness issues, resulting in misclassifying benign statements as hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T00:04:40Z)
• HyPoradise: An Open Baseline for Generative Speech Recognition with Large Language Models [81.56455625624041]
  We introduce the first open-source benchmark to utilize external large language models (LLMs) for ASR error correction. The proposed benchmark contains a novel dataset, HyPoradise (HP), encompassing more than 334,000 pairs of N-best hypotheses. LLMs with reasonable prompt and its generative capability can even correct those tokens that are missing in N-best list.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:44:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.