Decolonial Discourse in Postcolonial Contexts: How YouTubers Negotiate Audience Tensions, Platform Governance, and State Influence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26351v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:34:35 GMT
• Title: Decolonial Discourse in Postcolonial Contexts: How YouTubers Negotiate Audience Tensions, Platform Governance, and State Influence
• Abstract summary: We analyze how audience publics, platform governance, and state influences shape what becomes sayable, visible, and viable.<n>We show how fragmented postcolonial identities among audiences produce legitimacy policing, harassment, and coordinated backlash.
• Score: 5.28319257719949
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Decolonial discourse on online platforms is often framed in terms of creator motivations and expressive possibilities. In this paper, we examine what it takes to sustain such discourse under layered sociotechnical constraints. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with YouTubers engaging in Bengali decolonial discourse, we analyze how audience publics, platform governance, and state influences shape what becomes sayable, visible, and viable. We show how fragmented postcolonial identities among audiences produce legitimacy policing, harassment, and coordinated backlash, requiring ongoing relational labor from creators. At the platform level, differential monetization, opaque moderation, and copyright regimes reorganize which publics are economically viable and reinforce existing hierarchies. Further, intermediaries such as multi-channel networks mediate regulatory pressure, introducing political risks and constraints on participation. In response, content creators engage in strategies of negotiation, including boundary work, infrastructural improvisation, and multi-platform distribution. Overall, our findings highlight the layered dynamics of decolonial discourse in postcolonial contexts and the continuous work required to sustain it in platformed environments.

Related papers

• Automated Identification of Competing Narratives in Political Discourse on Social Media [0.0]
  This paper presents an unsupervised framework for identifying and characterizing competing narratives in political discourse on social media.<n>The framework is able to detect the key competing narratives, highlighting the divergent framings and conflicts surrounding trending political topics.<n>The findings contribute to the broader understanding of how narratives propagate within the digital public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T08:10:33Z)
• Platform Sorting Drives Ideological Fragmentation in the Social Media Ecosystem [38.151143956051705]
  Ideological asymmetries in online political communication are often studied as localized phenomena emerging within communities.<n>Here, we show that fragmentation operates at the level of entire platforms, consistent with a process of platform sorting.<n>We analyze political information dynamics across Bluesky, Facebook, Reddit, Truth Social, Twitter/X, and YouTube during the 2020 and 2024 US presidential elections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T08:41:17Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation [67.69631485036665]
  We conduct a comprehensive examination of hate speech regulations and strategies from three perspectives.<n>Our findings reveal significant inconsistencies in hate speech definitions and moderation practices across jurisdictions.<n>We suggest ideas and research direction for further exploration of a unified framework for automated hate speech moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T11:25:23Z)
• Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
  We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events.<n>Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion.<n>We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z)
• Ideology and polarization set the agenda on social media [32.6608163255408]
  This study analyzes large-scale Twitter data from three global debates--Climate Change, COVID-19, and the Russo-Ukrainian War--to investigate the structural dynamics of engagement.<n>Our findings reveal that discussions are not primarily shaped by specific categories of actors, such as media or activists, but by shared ideological alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T16:48:22Z)
• Modelling Political Coalition Negotiations Using LLM-based Agents [53.934372246390495]
  We introduce coalition negotiations as a novel NLP task, and model it as a negotiation between large language model-based agents. We introduce a multilingual dataset, POLCA, comprising manifestos of European political parties and coalition agreements over a number of elections in these countries. We propose a hierarchical Markov decision process designed to simulate the process of coalition negotiation between political parties and predict the outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T21:28:06Z)
• "We Demand Justice!": Towards Social Context Grounding of Political Texts [19.58924256275583]
  Social media discourse frequently consists of'seemingly similar language used by opposing sides of the political spectrum' This paper defines the context required to fully understand such ambiguous statements in a computational setting. We propose two challenging datasets that require an understanding of the real-world context of the text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T16:53:35Z)
• A Material Lens on Coloniality in NLP [57.63027898794855]
  Coloniality is the continuation of colonial harms beyond "official" colonization. We argue that coloniality is implicitly embedded in and amplified by NLP data, algorithms, and software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T18:52:09Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.<n>We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Channel-aware Decoupling Network for Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension [81.47133615169203]
  We propose compositional learning for holistic interaction across utterances beyond the sequential contextualization from PrLMs. We employ domain-adaptive training strategies to help the model adapt to the dialogue domains. Experimental results show that our method substantially boosts the strong PrLM baselines in four public benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T13:18:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.