Revisiting Continuous Noise Sampling for Multi-Party Differential Privacy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27766v1
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:57:31 GMT
- Title: Revisiting Continuous Noise Sampling for Multi-Party Differential Privacy
- Abstract summary: In this paper, we revisit the continuous noise sampling protocols and present several improvements in both security and efficiency.<n>We demonstrate that the scaling operation in arithmetic circuits the noise to a sparse, publicly known set of values, so that an adversary can observe the released noisy queries and decide which dataset produced them.<n>Our implementation achieves $4times sim 612times$ speedup over existing secure discrete samplers and orders-of-magnitude speedup over the insecure sample-and-scale paradigm.
- Score: 5.859502071587914
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Combining secure multi-party computation (MPC) with differential privacy (DP) enables multiple parties to release aggregate statistics without a trusted curator, and the core primitive is the protocol to sample noise from a continuous distribution under finite-precision arithmetic. In this paper, we revisit the continuous noise sampling protocols and present several improvements in both security and efficiency. We start by identifying a vulnerability in widely used sample-and-scale constructions. We demonstrate that the scaling operation in arithmetic circuits confines the noise to a sparse, publicly known set of values, so that an adversary can observe the released noisy queries and decide which dataset produced them. As concrete demonstrations, we instantiate attacks on two systems employing such ``flawed'' sampling protocols: Orchard (OSDI'20) for DP secure aggregation and DP-BREM$^+$ (USENIX Sec'25) for DP federated learning. We report a near-$100\%$ attack success rate on both systems, under any noise scaler $s\geq 2$ used in practice. The leakage we reveal is intrinsic to the scaling operation, and direct repairs either substantially sacrifice utility or add significant precision bits to make the sampling more expensive. To address the security and efficiency issues together, we turn to discrete sampling at the granularity of individual biased bits. We make several optimizations to the sampler and prove its security. Our implementation achieves $4\times \sim 612\times$ speedup over existing secure discrete samplers and orders-of-magnitude speedup over the insecure sample-and-scale paradigm, with negligible utility loss compared to the ideal continuous mechanism.
Related papers
- Combating Noisy Labels through Fostering Self- and Neighbor-Consistency [120.4394402099635]
Label noise is pervasive in various real-world scenarios, posing challenges in supervised deep learning.<n>We propose a noise-robust method named Jo-SNC (textbfJoint sample selection and model regularization based on textbfSelf- and textbfNeighbor-textbfConsistency)<n>We design a self-adaptive, data-driven thresholding scheme to adjust per-class selection thresholds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-19T07:55:29Z) - Benchmarking Fraud Detectors on Private Graph Data [70.4654745317714]
Currently, many types of fraud are managed in part by automated detection algorithms that operate over graphs.<n>We consider the scenario where a data holder wishes to outsource development of fraud detectors to third parties.<n>Third parties submit their fraud detectors to the data holder, who evaluates these algorithms on a private dataset and then publicly communicates the results.<n>We propose a realistic privacy attack on this system that allows an adversary to de-anonymize individuals' data based only on the evaluation results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-30T03:20:15Z) - Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential Privacy [3.0325535716232404]
Two well-known models of Differential Privacy (DP) are the central model and the local model.
Recently, many studies have proposed to achieve DP with Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) in distributed settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T19:04:47Z) - Noise Variance Optimization in Differential Privacy: A Game-Theoretic Approach Through Per-Instance Differential Privacy [7.264378254137811]
Differential privacy (DP) can measure privacy loss by observing the changes in the distribution caused by the inclusion of individuals in the target dataset.
DP has been prominent in safeguarding datasets in machine learning in industry giants like Apple and Google.
We propose per-instance DP (pDP) as a constraint, measuring privacy loss for each data instance and optimizing noise tailored to individual instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T06:51:16Z) - An Efficient Rehearsal Scheme for Catastrophic Forgetting Mitigation during Multi-stage Fine-tuning [55.467047686093025]
A common approach to alleviate such forgetting is to rehearse samples from prior tasks during fine-tuning.<n>We propose a sampling scheme, textttbf mix-cd, that prioritizes rehearsal of collateral damage'' samples.<n>Our approach is computationally efficient, easy to implement, and outperforms several leading continual learning methods in compute-constrained settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T22:32:12Z) - Enhancing Trade-offs in Privacy, Utility, and Computational Efficiency through MUltistage Sampling Technique (MUST) [3.0939420223851446]
We propose a class of subsampling methods for privacy amplification (PA)
We conduct comprehensive analyses of the PA effects and utility for several 2-stage MUST procedures.
We provide the privacy loss composition analysis over repeated applications of MUST.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T19:38:29Z) - Robust Control for Dynamical Systems With Non-Gaussian Noise via Formal
Abstractions [59.605246463200736]
We present a novel controller synthesis method that does not rely on any explicit representation of the noise distributions.
First, we abstract the continuous control system into a finite-state model that captures noise by probabilistic transitions between discrete states.
We use state-of-the-art verification techniques to provide guarantees on the interval Markov decision process and compute a controller for which these guarantees carry over to the original control system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-04T10:40:30Z) - Sampling-Based Robust Control of Autonomous Systems with Non-Gaussian
Noise [59.47042225257565]
We present a novel planning method that does not rely on any explicit representation of the noise distributions.
First, we abstract the continuous system into a discrete-state model that captures noise by probabilistic transitions between states.
We capture these bounds in the transition probability intervals of a so-called interval Markov decision process (iMDP)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-25T06:18:55Z) - Learning Numeric Optimal Differentially Private Truncated Additive
Mechanisms [5.079561894598125]
We introduce a tool to learn truncated noise for additive mechanisms with strong utility bounds.
We show that it is sufficient to consider symmetric and thatnew, for from the mean monotonically falling noise.
For sensitivity bounded mechanisms, we show that it is sufficient to consider symmetric and thatnew, for from the mean monotonically falling noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-27T17:22:57Z) - Improved, Deterministic Smoothing for L1 Certified Robustness [119.86676998327864]
We propose a non-additive and deterministic smoothing method, Deterministic Smoothing with Splitting Noise (DSSN)
In contrast to uniform additive smoothing, the SSN certification does not require the random noise components used to be independent.
This is the first work to provide deterministic "randomized smoothing" for a norm-based adversarial threat model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-17T21:49:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.