Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential Privacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10667v2
• Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:43:39 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Secure Sampling Protocols for Differential Privacy
• Authors: Yucheng Fu, Tianhao Wang,
• Abstract summary: Two well-known models of Differential Privacy (DP) are the central model and the local model. Recently, many studies have proposed to achieve DP with Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) in distributed settings.
• Score: 3.0325535716232404
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) is widely employed to provide privacy protection for individuals by limiting information leakage from the aggregated data. Two well-known models of DP are the central model and the local model. The former requires a trustworthy server for data aggregation, while the latter requires individuals to add noise, significantly decreasing the utility of aggregated results. Recently, many studies have proposed to achieve DP with Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) in distributed settings, namely, the distributed model, which has utility comparable to central model while, under specific security assumptions, preventing parties from obtaining others' information. One challenge of realizing DP in distributed model is efficiently sampling noise with MPC. Although many secure sampling methods have been proposed, they have different security assumptions and isolated theoretical analyses. There is a lack of experimental evaluations to measure and compare their performances. We fill this gap by benchmarking existing sampling protocols in MPC and performing comprehensive measurements of their efficiency. First, we present a taxonomy of the underlying techniques of these sampling protocols. Second, we extend widely used distributed noise generation protocols to be resilient against Byzantine attackers. Third, we implement discrete sampling protocols and align their security settings for a fair comparison. We then conduct an extensive evaluation to study their efficiency and utility.

Related papers

• PriRoAgg: Achieving Robust Model Aggregation with Minimum Privacy Leakage for Federated Learning [49.916365792036636]
  Federated learning (FL) has recently gained significant momentum due to its potential to leverage large-scale distributed user data. The transmitted model updates can potentially leak sensitive user information, and the lack of central control of the local training process leaves the global model susceptible to malicious manipulations on model updates. We develop a general framework PriRoAgg, utilizing Lagrange coded computing and distributed zero-knowledge proof, to execute a wide range of robust aggregation algorithms while satisfying aggregated privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T03:18:08Z)
• Auditing Differential Privacy Guarantees Using Density Estimation [3.830092569453011]
  We present a novel method for accurately auditing the differential privacy guarantees of DP mechanisms. In particular, our solution is applicable to auditing DP guarantees of machine learning (ML) models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T10:52:15Z)
• Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Hybrid Language Model Evaluation [62.2436697657307]
  Prediction-powered inference (PPI) is a method that improves statistical estimates based on limited human-labeled data. We propose a method called Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference (StratPPI) We show that the basic PPI estimates can be considerably improved by employing simple data stratification strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:37:39Z)
• Noise Variance Optimization in Differential Privacy: A Game-Theoretic Approach Through Per-Instance Differential Privacy [7.264378254137811]
  Differential privacy (DP) can measure privacy loss by observing the changes in the distribution caused by the inclusion of individuals in the target dataset. DP has been prominent in safeguarding datasets in machine learning in industry giants like Apple and Google. We propose per-instance DP (pDP) as a constraint, measuring privacy loss for each data instance and optimizing noise tailored to individual instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T06:51:16Z)
• Incentives in Private Collaborative Machine Learning [56.84263918489519]
  Collaborative machine learning involves training models on data from multiple parties. We introduce differential privacy (DP) as an incentive. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness and practicality of our approach on synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:28:22Z)
• Adaptive Differentially Quantized Subspace Perturbation (ADQSP): A Unified Framework for Privacy-Preserving Distributed Average Consensus [6.364764301218972]
  We propose a general approach named adaptive differentially quantized subspace (ADQSP) We show that by varying a single quantization parameter the proposed method can vary between SMPC-type performances and DP-type performances. Our results show the potential of exploiting traditional distributed signal processing tools for providing cryptographic guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T07:52:16Z)
• Federated Experiment Design under Distributed Differential Privacy [31.06808163362162]
  We focus on the rigorous protection of users' privacy while minimizing the trust toward service providers. Although a vital component in modern A/B testing, private distributed experimentation has not previously been studied. We show how these mechanisms can be scaled up to handle the very large number of participants commonly found in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T22:38:56Z)
• Simulation-based, Finite-sample Inference for Privatized Data [14.218697973204065]
  We propose a simulation-based "repro sample" approach to produce statistically valid confidence intervals and hypothesis tests. We show that this methodology is applicable to a wide variety of private inference problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:19:31Z)
• Differentially Private Federated Clustering over Non-IID Data [59.611244450530315]
  clustering clusters (FedC) problem aims to accurately partition unlabeled data samples distributed over massive clients into finite clients under the orchestration of a server. We propose a novel FedC algorithm using differential privacy convergence technique, referred to as DP-Fed, in which partial participation and multiple clients are also considered. Various attributes of the proposed DP-Fed are obtained through theoretical analyses of privacy protection, especially for the case of non-identically and independently distributed (non-i.i.d.) data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T05:38:43Z)
• Noise-Resistant Deep Metric Learning with Probabilistic Instance Filtering [59.286567680389766]
  Noisy labels are commonly found in real-world data, which cause performance degradation of deep neural networks. We propose Probabilistic Ranking-based Instance Selection with Memory (PRISM) approach for DML. PRISM calculates the probability of a label being clean, and filters out potentially noisy samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-03T12:15:25Z)
• RDP-GAN: A R\'enyi-Differential Privacy based Generative Adversarial Network [75.81653258081435]
  Generative adversarial network (GAN) has attracted increasing attention recently owing to its impressive ability to generate realistic samples with high privacy protection. However, when GANs are applied on sensitive or private training examples, such as medical or financial records, it is still probable to divulge individuals' sensitive and private information. We propose a R'enyi-differentially private-GAN (RDP-GAN), which achieves differential privacy (DP) in a GAN by carefully adding random noises on the value of the loss function during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T09:51:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.