TACIT-Switch: Cost-Aware Model Escalation for LLM Agents from Censored Supervision
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.27911v2
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 03:33:01 GMT
- Title: TACIT-Switch: Cost-Aware Model Escalation for LLM Agents from Censored Supervision
- Abstract summary: Agents with smaller language-model backbones can drift into persistent failure modes, whereas those with larger backbones are generally more reliable but more costly.<n>This reliability-cost trade-off motivates routing methods that decide when to invoke an agent with a larger backbone.<n>Our method, TACIT-SWITCH, learns permanent handoff policies from accumulated trajectory evidence and Teacher-Annotated Censored Intervention Times.
- Score: 2.681967953218225
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Agents with smaller language-model backbones are less expensive but can drift into persistent failure modes, whereas those with larger backbones are generally more reliable but more costly. This reliability-cost trade-off motivates routing methods that decide when to invoke an agent with a larger backbone: before execution, after a fixed trajectory prefix, or locally at individual steps. Our method, TACIT-SWITCH, learns permanent handoff policies from accumulated trajectory evidence and Teacher-Annotated Censored Intervention Times (TACIT). It represents each annotation as an interval-censored observation on a cumulative-risk scale. The resulting mixture-cure threshold model estimates the probability that the paired Strong rollout succeeds and, conditional on success, the handoff threshold; no teacher is required at deployment. In a mechanism-based multi-step simulation, TACIT-SWITCH improves success by 7.4-11.1 percentage points over task-level, step-level, and fixed-prefix routing baselines at comparable cost. Within that controlled simulation, ablations show that task features and cumulative trajectory risk provide complementary information. With operating points selected on development data, TACIT-SWITCH achieves the highest held-out success among learned policies on both ALFWorld (48.5% with 4B Cheap; 45.5% with 9B Cheap) and DABench (73.1%).
Related papers
- When Not to Imitate: Boundary-Aware Skill Memory for Reliable Tool-Use LLM Agents [62.10623192614306]
Extracting skills from past successes is critical for the efficient evolution of Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>We propose textbfBoundary-Aware Skill Memory (BASM), which augments each skill with explicit boundary fields.<n>BASM consistently outperforms success-distilled skill-memory baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T10:16:06Z) - TRCA: Transition-wise Rubric Credit Assignment for Long-horizon LLM Agents [22.01777615106231]
Long-horizon large language model (LLM) agents are typically optimized with sparse terminal outcomes.<n>We propose Transition-wise Credit Assignment, which derives step-level supervision directly from action-induced transitions.<n>Experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and seven search-augmented question-answering benchmarks show consistent improvements over the evaluated baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-17T06:19:12Z) - A Systematic Evaluation of Trajectory Data Curation for LoRA Fine-Tuning of Code Agents [0.0]
Supervised fine-tuning of open-weight LLMs on expert agent trajectories has emerged as a prominent approach to building capable code agents.<n>We present a systematic empirical study of trajectory data filtering for LoRA fine-tuning of Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct on the SWE-trajectory dataset.<n>We propose a two-axis quality scoring framework -- Efficiency and Style -- and evaluate it through 16 controlled experiments spanning strategy, scale, and ablation analyses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-19T11:52:32Z) - Learning from Failure: Inference-Time Self-Improvement for Computer-Use Agents [80.03824805228719]
A major challenge in developing computer-use agents is collecting large-scale, high-quality trajectories.<n>We propose a data-centric paradigm that turns failed trajectories into agent improvements.<n>We validate this approach with the state-of-the-art OpenCUA-72B model on the OSWorld benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-30T07:44:37Z) - StepOPSD: Step-Aware Online Preference Distillation for Agent Reinforcement Learning [6.365332042924078]
We present StepOPSD, a post-rollout preference self-distillation framework that takes the agent step as the unit of credit redistribution.<n>StepOPSD decomposes trajectories into action-centered step segments, rescoring them under hindsight-enriched teacher contexts.<n>Results reveal a consistent two-knob law: smaller _clip acts as a broadly stabilizing local trust region, whereas the optimal global mixing strength _mix remains task-dependent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T15:07:03Z) - R2V Agent: Teaching SLMs When to Ask for Help [13.959667066774124]
We introduce textbfR2V-Agent, a risk-calibrated SLM-LLM routing framework for interactive agents.<n>R2V combines four components: a distilled small language model (SLM) policy, a stronger teacher LLM, a lightweight process verifier that scores candidate actions at each step, and a calibrated step-level router.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T20:10:24Z) - Rewarding the Scientific Process: Process-Level Reward Modeling for Agentic Data Analysis [68.28714988482703]
Process Reward Models (PRMs) have achieved remarkable success in augmenting the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We present a study revealing that general-domain PRMs struggle to supervise data analysis agents.<n>We introduce DataPRM, a novel environment-aware generative process reward model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-27T09:00:30Z) - Efficient Process Reward Modeling via Contrastive Mutual Information [8.346479730119436]
We propose contrastive pointwise mutual information (CPMI) as a novel automatic reward labeling method.<n>CPMI quantifies how much a reasoning step increases the mutual information between the step and the correct target answer.<n>We show that CPMI-based labeling reduces dataset construction time by 84% and token generation by 98% compared to MC estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-12T14:28:35Z) - Verified Critical Step Optimization for LLM Agents [67.05296684575445]
Critical Step Optimization focuses preference learning on verified critical steps.<n>Method starts from failed policy trajectories rather than expert demonstrations.<n>Experiments on GAIA-Text-103 and XBench-DeepSearch show that CSO achieves 37% and 26% relative improvement over the SFT baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T11:41:02Z) - Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process.
We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals.
The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z) - DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based Reasoning [56.887047551101574]
We present DS-Agent, a novel framework that harnesses large language models (LLMs) agent and case-based reasoning (CBR)
In the development stage, DS-Agent follows the CBR framework to structure an automatic iteration pipeline, which can flexibly capitalize on the expert knowledge from Kaggle.
In the deployment stage, DS-Agent implements a low-resource deployment stage with a simplified CBR paradigm, significantly reducing the demand on foundational capabilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T12:26:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.