Residual-Guided Randomized Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28267v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 12:30:08 GMT
• Title: Residual-Guided Randomized Neural Networks
• Abstract summary: Randomized neural networks enable fast and analytically tractable training by fixing the input to hidden layer parameters at random and learning the output weights in closed form.<n>We propose a simple and broadly applicable residual guided procedure that greedily constructs the hidden layer using a closed form residual decrease criterion.<n>We show that the proposed residual-guided models consistently outperform their baseline counterparts in terms of accuracy, stability, and overall ranking performance.
• Score: 7.698602367824994
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Randomized neural networks enable fast and analytically tractable training by fixing the input to hidden layer parameters at random and learning the output weights in closed form; however, their performance critically depends on a single uninformed draw of hidden units. This one shot and task uninformed feature construction often leads to redundant representations and suboptimal utilization of model capacity. To address this limitation, we propose a simple and broadly applicable residual guided procedure that greedily constructs the hidden layer using a closed form residual decrease criterion. At each stage, we (i) generate a pool of random candidate units, (ii) score each candidate by the exact reduction it induces in the ridge regularized objective, (iii) select the top k units, and (iv) refit the readout in closed form using the standard design with direct input links. This procedure yields a progressive training process with a guaranteed monotonic decrease of the training objective. The method is model agnostic: only the candidate generation is architecture specific, while the scoring selection refitting loop is shared across models. Extensive experiments on 71 benchmark datasets from the UCI repository, covering both binary and multiclass classification tasks, demonstrate that the proposed residual-guided models consistently outperform their baseline counterparts in terms of accuracy, stability, and overall ranking performance.

Related papers

• Model Merging by Output-Space Projection [6.752805486904705]
  Model merging combines fine-tuned checkpoints into a single multi-task model without retraining.<n>We show that merging can be formulated as a convex programme over residual updates.<n>We extend to multi-layer merging via a sequential layer-wise algorithm and demonstrate consistent gains across language and vision benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T21:01:29Z)
• Learning from Emptiness: De-biasing Listwise Rerankers with Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration [76.08899010904652]
  CapCal is a training-free framework that mechanically decouples positional bias from ranking decisions.<n>It achieves superior performance among training-free methods while preserving single-pass efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-11T10:47:22Z)
• What Does It Take to Build a Performant Selective Classifier? [30.90225954725644]
  Bayes noise, approximation error, ranking error, statistical noise, and implementation- or shift-induced slack are studied.<n>We validate our decomposition on synthetic two-moons data and on real-world vision and language benchmarks.<n>Our results confirm that (i) Bayes noise and limited model capacity can account for substantial gaps, (ii) only richer, feature-aware calibrators meaningfully improve score ordering, and (iii) data shift introduces a separate slack that demands distributionally robust training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T05:48:40Z)
• LaSeR: Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding [54.72617309922891]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a core paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Previous practice requires the LLM to sequentially generate solutions and self-verifications using two separate prompt templates, which significantly reduces efficiency.<n>We propose LaSeR (Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding), an algorithm that simply augments the original RLVR loss with a MSE loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T17:55:11Z)
• Deep Hierarchical Learning with Nested Subspace Networks [53.71337604556311]
  We propose Nested Subspace Networks (NSNs) for large neural networks.<n>NSNs enable a single model to be dynamically and granularly adjusted across a continuous spectrum of compute budgets.<n>We show that NSNs can be surgically applied to pre-trained LLMs and unlock a smooth and predictable compute-performance frontier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T15:13:14Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Towards Continual Learning Desiderata via HSIC-Bottleneck Orthogonalization and Equiangular Embedding [55.107555305760954]
  We propose a conceptually simple yet effective method that attributes forgetting to layer-wise parameter overwriting and the resulting decision boundary distortion. Our method achieves competitive accuracy performance, even with absolute superiority of zero exemplar buffer and 1.02x the base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T09:01:29Z)
• Noisy Correspondence Learning with Self-Reinforcing Errors Mitigation [63.180725016463974]
  Cross-modal retrieval relies on well-matched large-scale datasets that are laborious in practice. We introduce a novel noisy correspondence learning framework, namely textbfSelf-textbfReinforcing textbfErrors textbfMitigation (SREM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T09:03:43Z)
• Stochastic Deep Networks with Linear Competing Units for Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning [4.97235247328373]
  This work addresses meta-learning (ML) by considering deep networks with local winner-takes-all (LWTA) activations. This type of network units results in sparse representations from each model layer, as the units are organized into blocks where only one unit generates a non-zero output. Our approach produces state-of-the-art predictive accuracy on few-shot image classification and regression experiments, as well as reduced predictive error on an active learning setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-02T16:19:54Z)
• Lifelong Learning Without a Task Oracle [13.331659934508764]
  Supervised deep neural networks are known to undergo a sharp decline in the accuracy of older tasks when new tasks are learned. We propose and compare several candidate task-assigning mappers which require very little memory overhead. Best-performing variants only impose an average cost of 1.7% parameter memory increase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:30:31Z)
• Pre-training Is (Almost) All You Need: An Application to Commonsense Reasoning [61.32992639292889]
  Fine-tuning of pre-trained transformer models has become the standard approach for solving common NLP tasks. We introduce a new scoring method that casts a plausibility ranking task in a full-text format. We show that our method provides a much more stable training phase across random restarts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T10:54:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.