Evaluating the Hidden Costs of Personalization in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28833v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:05:12 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Hidden Costs of Personalization in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We identify three emerging risks: (1) irrelevant personalization, where models reference personal information in unnecessary contexts; (2) preference narrowing, where models reinforce informational echo chambers; and (3) sycophantic bias, where models agree excessively with user opinions.<n>We propose PRISK, a dynamic evaluation framework with automated data generation and tailored metrics that uncovers systematic limitations in current AI assistants.
• Score: 55.07935163900691
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While Large language models (LLMs) incorporate user personalization signals to improve usability and helpfulness, they increasingly shift from providing balanced, informative responses toward optimizing for user satisfaction when conditioned on personal context such as conversation history, inferred preferences, and user profiles. Specifically, we identify three emerging risks: (1) irrelevant personalization, where models reference personal information in unnecessary contexts; (2) preference narrowing, where models reinforce informational echo chambers; and (3) sycophantic bias, where models agree excessively with user opinions. As a result, models may reference personal information in contexts where it is unnecessary, inadvertently collapse response diversity, or agree excessively with user opinions. Despite the growing use of personalization in AI assistants, there has been limited systematic evaluation of its potential side effects. To bridge this gap, we propose PRISK, a dynamic evaluation framework with automated data generation and tailored metrics that uncovers systematic limitations in current LLM personalization and how personalized information shapes its responses. Our empirical analysis across 13 LLMs demonstrates the presence of user profiles and retrieved memories consistently exacerbates biases, resulting in an average drop of 45.9% in irrelevant personalization, 41.7% in preference narrowing and 61.7% in sycophantic bias.

Related papers

• Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation [59.539429430690156]
  Existing evaluation methods fail to capture user-specific preferences embedded in long-term interaction histories.<n>We propose Personalized Evaluation as Learning, a paradigm that formulates personalized evaluation as a learning problem rather than a static judgment.<n>Experiments show that PARL consistently induces high-fidelity rubrics that reliably identify user-aligned responses and generalize across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T17:00:55Z)
• When to Ask a Question: Understanding Communication Strategies in Generative AI Tools [7.445350484328613]
  We show how generative AI systems should balance inference and elicitation, characterizing the optimal amount of information to solicit before content generation.<n>We show that information elicitation can mitigate the systematic biases of preference inference, enabling the design of generative tools that better incorporate diverse user perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T20:58:09Z)
• Sparse Personalized Text Generation with Multi-Trajectory Reasoning [95.19317487799292]
  PAT (Personalization with Aligned Trajectories) is a reasoning framework for cold-start LLM personalization.<n>It first retrieves information along two complementary trajectories: writing-style cues from stylistically similar users and topic-specific context from preference-aligned users.<n>It then employs a reinforcement learning-based, iterative dual-reasoning mechanism that enables the LLM to jointly refine and integrate these signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T20:58:49Z)
• Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models [67.31884245564086]
  We introduce a high-fidelity synthetic data generation framework called PersonaGym.<n>Unlike prior work that treats personalization as static persona-preference pairs, PersonaGym models a dynamic preference process.<n>We release PersonaAtlas, a large-scale, high-quality, and diverse synthetic dataset of high-fidelity multi-turn personalized interaction trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T20:41:22Z)
• When Personalization Misleads: Understanding and Mitigating Hallucinations in Personalized LLMs [13.695058536403108]
  We show that when personalized large language models (LLMs) face factual queries, the model generates answers aligned with a user's prior history rather than the objective truth.<n>We propose Factuality-Preserving Personalized Steering (FPPS), a lightweight inference-time approach that mitigates personalization-induced factual distortions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T05:20:10Z)
• Personalized Reasoning: Just-In-Time Personalization and Why LLMs Fail At It [81.50711040539566]
  Current large language model (LLM) development treats task-solving and preference alignment as separate challenges.<n>We introduce PREFDISCO, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks.<n>Our framework creates scenarios where identical questions require different reasoning chains depending on user context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T18:55:28Z)
• PREFINE: Personalized Story Generation via Simulated User Critics and User-Specific Rubric Generation [2.8324853634693614]
  PREFINE is a novel framework that extends the Critique-and-Refine paradigm to personalization.<n> PREFINE constructs a pseudo-user agent from a user's interaction history and generates user-specific rubrics.<n>Our approach holds potential for enabling efficient personalization in broader applications, such as dialogue systems, education, and recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T16:39:40Z)
• Detecting Prefix Bias in LLM-based Reward Models [4.596249232904721]
  We introduce novel methods to detect and evaluate prefix bias in reward models trained on preference datasets.<n>We leverage these metrics to reveal significant biases in preference models across racial and gender dimensions.<n>Our findings highlight the critical need for bias-aware dataset design and evaluation in developing fair and reliable reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T21:50:03Z)
• ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization [122.54846260663922]
  ComPO is a method to personalize preference optimization in language models. We collect and release ComPRed, a question answering dataset with community-level preferences from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T14:02:40Z)
• Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedback [45.16986573937782]
  Personalized large language models (LLMs) are designed to tailor responses to individual user preferences.<n>We propose Personalized-RLHF, an efficient framework that utilizes a lightweight user model to capture individual user preferences.<n>We show that personalized LLMs trained using P-RLHF generate responses that are more closely aligned with individual user preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T04:18:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.