MMMMM: A Unified Taxonomy for Investigating the Mechanisms of Multilingual MultiModal Misinformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29681v1
• Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 09:30:19 GMT
• Title: MMMMM: A Unified Taxonomy for Investigating the Mechanisms of Multilingual MultiModal Misinformation
• Abstract summary: Multimodal misinformation on social media is highly prevalent, potent, and harmful, yet difficult to detect and counter.<n>Research on the properties and deceptive strategies of multimodal misinformation is hindered by a lack of multimodal misinformation grounded in real-world contexts.<n>We develop a novel, comprehensive taxonomy of multimodal misinformation grounded in an in-depth qualitative analysis of the data and prior theoretical work.
• Score: 45.9148426649897
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal misinformation on social media is highly prevalent, potent, and harmful, yet difficult to detect and counter, and still poorly understood compared to its text-only counterpart. Research on the properties and deceptive strategies of multimodal misinformation is hindered by a lack of taxonomies grounded in real-world contexts and by the limitations of current multimodal machine learning models, which prevent the automation of annotation and analysis at scale. We address these shortcomings in three steps. First, we collect a large-scale, high-quality dataset of real-world misinformation instances from Twitter/X in seven languages. Second, we develop a novel, comprehensive taxonomy of multimodal misinformation grounded in an in-depth qualitative analysis of the data and prior theoretical work. Finally, we operationalise the taxonomy through an automated multi-step annotation pipeline using a Vision-Language Model (VLM), and perform human-validation. Our novel approach leads to previously undocumented insights about how social media users combine images with text to spread misinformation in the wild, e.g., that AI-generated content is particularly prevalent in technology and science, while vaccination misinformation disproportionately utilises images from news outlets to assert credibility. Our method and findings provide guidance for targeted approaches for detecting multimodal misinformation, and suggest that mitigation efforts should be developed and applied strategically rather than uniformly.

Related papers

• MMD-Thinker: Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Thinking for Multimodal Misinformation Detection [8.06079393106578]
  Multimodal misinformation floods on various social media, and continues to evolve in the era of AI-generated content (AIGC)<n>Recent studies leverage general-purpose multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to achieve remarkable results in detection.<n>We propose MMD-Thinker, a two-stage framework for multimodal misinformation detection through adaptive multi-dimensional thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T11:04:30Z)
• Insight-A: Attribution-aware for Multimodal Misinformation Detection [14.02125134424451]
  We present Insight-A, exploring attribution with MLLM insights for detecting multimodal misinformation.<n>We devise cross-attribution prompting (CAP) to model the sophisticated correlations between perception and reasoning.<n>We also design image captioning (IC) to achieve visual details for enhancing cross-modal consistency checking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T02:33:36Z)
• Towards Unified Multimodal Misinformation Detection in Social Media: A Benchmark Dataset and Baseline [56.790045049514326]
  Two major forms of deception dominate: human-crafted misinformation and AI-generated content.<n>We propose Unified Multimodal Fake Content Detection (UMFDet), a framework designed to handle both forms of deception.<n>UMFDet achieves robust and consistent performance across both misinformation types, outperforming specialized baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T09:26:32Z)
• When Language Overrules: Revealing Text Dominance in Multimodal Large Language Models [10.106066580331584]
  We conduct the first systematic investigation of text dominance across diverse data modalities, including images, videos, audio, time-series, and graphs.<n>Our in-depth analysis identifies three underlying causes: attention dilution from severe token redundancy in non-textual modalities, the influence of fusion architecture design, and task formulations that implicitly favor textual inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T11:44:52Z)
• Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation [88.78166077081912]
  We introduce a multimodal unlearning benchmark, UnLOK-VQA, and an attack-and-defense framework to evaluate methods for deleting specific multimodal knowledge from MLLMs.<n>Our results show multimodal attacks outperform text- or image-only ones, and that the most effective defense removes answer information from internal model states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T01:54:00Z)
• Unmasking Digital Falsehoods: A Comparative Analysis of LLM-Based Misinformation Detection Strategies [0.0]
  This paper conducts a comparison of approaches to detecting misinformation between text-based, multimodal, and agentic approaches.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of fine-tuned models, zero-shot learning, and systematic fact-checking mechanisms in detecting misinformation across different topic domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-02T04:31:42Z)
• A Self-Learning Multimodal Approach for Fake News Detection [35.98977478616019]
  We introduce a self-learning multimodal model for fake news classification.<n>The model leverages contrastive learning, a robust method for feature extraction that operates without requiring labeled data.<n>Our experimental results on a public dataset demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms several state-of-the-art classification approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T07:41:44Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• Detecting Cross-Modal Inconsistency to Defend Against Neural Fake News [57.9843300852526]
  We introduce the more realistic and challenging task of defending against machine-generated news that also includes images and captions. To identify the possible weaknesses that adversaries can exploit, we create a NeuralNews dataset composed of 4 different types of generated articles. In addition to the valuable insights gleaned from our user study experiments, we provide a relatively effective approach based on detecting visual-semantic inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T14:13:15Z)
• Multimodal Categorization of Crisis Events in Social Media [81.07061295887172]
  We present a new multimodal fusion method that leverages both images and texts as input. In particular, we introduce a cross-attention module that can filter uninformative and misleading components from weak modalities. We show that our method outperforms the unimodal approaches and strong multimodal baselines by a large margin on three crisis-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-10T06:31:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.