Learning to Reason and Use Tools through Unsupervised Fine-Tuning in Task-Oriented Dialog Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30426v1
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:22:26 GMT
- Title: Learning to Reason and Use Tools through Unsupervised Fine-Tuning in Task-Oriented Dialog Systems
- Abstract summary: We adapt the ReAct framework for Task-Oriented Dialogue, enabling Large Language Models to access external knowledge and produce factual responses.<n>We propose an unsupervised fine-tuning pipeline that harvests reasoning trajectories via in-context learning inference.<n> Experiments on the SIMMC dataset demonstrate that ReAct-based systems outperform baselines due to superior reasoning and tool use.
- Score: 4.740691414185166
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Current dialogue systems struggle with dynamic information retrieval, often leading to hallucinations and lower response accuracy. We address this by adapting the ReAct framework for Task-Oriented Dialogue, enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to access external knowledge and produce factual responses. Mainly, we propose an unsupervised fine-tuning pipeline that harvests reasoning trajectories via in-context learning inference. High-quality samples are filtered using an LLM-based judge to construct a robust training set. This is enhanced by a unsupervised self-improvement loop, where improved checkpoints generate increasingly better trajectories for subsequent fine-tuning iterations. Experiments on the SIMMC dataset demonstrate that ReAct-based systems outperform baselines due to superior reasoning and tool use. Notably, our fine-tuned 8B model surpasses a 70B in-context system. Finally, we present an error analysis, impact of scene complexity, and cross-domain generalization.
Related papers
- RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models [54.53236295237077]
We introduce RepoReasoner, a benchmark for evaluating repository-level code reasoning.<n> Output Prediction measures fine-grained, stateful execution reasoning across files.<n>Call Chain Prediction evaluates high-level architectural dependency understanding under noisy context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-28T17:12:41Z) - CLEAR: Context Augmentation from Contrastive Learning of Experience via Agentic Reflection [17.486111179784757]
We propose a generative context augmentation framework using Contrastive Learning of Experience via Agentic Reflection (CLEAR)<n>CLEAR first employs a reflection agent to perform contrastive analysis over past execution trajectories and summarize useful context for each observed task.<n>We further optimize CAM using reinforcement learning, where the reward signal is obtained by running the task execution agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T18:26:59Z) - Guided Verifier: Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning via Dynamic Process Supervision [11.159231524113764]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>In this paper, we propose the textbfGuided Verifier framework to address these structural limitations.<n>We develop a specialized data synthesis pipeline targeting multimodal hallucinations, constructing textbfCoRe dataset of process-level negatives and textbfCorrect-guide textbfReasoning trajectories to train the guided verifier.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T07:38:42Z) - Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - LANPO: Bootstrapping Language and Numerical Feedback for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs [73.27182315028021]
LANPO is a framework that cleanly separates the roles of feedback: language guides exploration, while numerical rewards drive optimization.<n>Our work provides a robust method for integrating historical experiences into the LLM RL loop, creating more effective and data-efficient learning agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-18T15:51:19Z) - Sample-Efficient Online Learning in LM Agents via Hindsight Trajectory Rewriting [92.57796055887995]
We introduce ECHO, a prompting framework that adapts hindsight experience replay from reinforcement learning for language model agents.<n> ECHO generates optimized trajectories for alternative goals that could have been achieved during failed attempts.<n>We evaluate ECHO on stateful versions of XMiniGrid, a text-based navigation and planning benchmark, and PeopleJoinQA, a collaborative information-gathering enterprise simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-11T18:11:09Z) - KnowMT-Bench: Benchmarking Knowledge-Intensive Long-Form Question Answering in Multi-Turn Dialogues [58.305425399644086]
Multi-Turn Long-Form Question Answering (MT-LFQA) is a key application paradigm of Large Language Models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive domains.<n>We introduce textbfKnowMT-Bench, the textitfirst-ever benchmark designed to systematically evaluate MT-LFQA for LLMs across knowledge-intensive fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T04:32:29Z) - Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [35.50952279309109]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with context fidelity, producing inconsistent answers when responding to questions based on provided information.<n>We propose CARE, a novel native retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that teaches LLMs to explicitly integrate in-context evidence within their reasoning process with the model's own retrieval capabilities.<n>Our method requires limited labeled evidence data while significantly enhancing both retrieval accuracy and answer generation performance through strategically retrieved in-context tokens in the reasoning chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-17T04:28:07Z) - From Seeing to Experiencing: Scaling Navigation Foundation Models with Reinforcement Learning [59.88543114325153]
We introduce the Seeing-to-Experiencing framework to scale the capability of navigation foundation models with reinforcement learning.<n>S2E combines the strengths of pre-training on videos and post-training through RL.<n>We establish a comprehensive end-to-end evaluation benchmark, NavBench-GS, built on photorealistic 3DGS reconstructions of real-world scenes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-29T17:26:10Z) - In-context Demonstration Matters: On Prompt Optimization for Pseudo-Supervision Refinement [71.60563181678323]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved great success across diverse tasks, and fine-tuning is sometimes needed to further enhance generation quality.<n>To handle these challenges, a direct solution is to generate high-confidence'' data from unsupervised downstream tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach, pseudo-supervised demonstrations aligned prompt optimization (PAPO) algorithm, which jointly refines both the prompt and the overall pseudo-supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T03:39:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.