Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13683v1
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 04:28:07 GMT
- Title: Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
- Authors: Suyuchen Wang, Jinlin Wang, Xinyu Wang, Shiqi Li, Xiangru Tang, Sirui Hong, Xiao-Wen Chang, Chenglin Wu, Bang Liu,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with context fidelity, producing inconsistent answers when responding to questions based on provided information.<n>We propose CARE, a novel native retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that teaches LLMs to explicitly integrate in-context evidence within their reasoning process with the model's own retrieval capabilities.<n>Our method requires limited labeled evidence data while significantly enhancing both retrieval accuracy and answer generation performance through strategically retrieved in-context tokens in the reasoning chain.
- Score: 35.50952279309109
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with context fidelity, producing inconsistent answers when responding to questions based on provided information. Existing approaches either rely on expensive supervised fine-tuning to generate evidence post-answer or train models to perform web searches without necessarily improving utilization of the given context. We propose CARE, a novel native retrieval-augmented reasoning framework that teaches LLMs to explicitly integrate in-context evidence within their reasoning process with the model's own retrieval capabilities. Our method requires limited labeled evidence data while significantly enhancing both retrieval accuracy and answer generation performance through strategically retrieved in-context tokens in the reasoning chain. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world and counterfactual QA benchmarks demonstrate that our approach substantially outperforms supervised fine-tuning, traditional retrieval-augmented generation methods, and external retrieval solutions. This work represents a fundamental advancement in making LLMs more accurate, reliable, and efficient for knowledge-intensive tasks.
Related papers
- Leveraging LLM Parametric Knowledge for Fact Checking without Retrieval [60.25608870901428]
Trustworthiness is a core research challenge for agentic AI systems built on Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose the task of fact-checking without retrieval, focusing on the verification of arbitrary natural language claims, independent of their source robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T18:42:51Z) - Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z) - ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z) - Towards Context-aware Reasoning-enhanced Generative Searching in E-commerce [61.03081096959132]
We propose a context-aware reasoning-enhanced generative search framework for better textbfunderstanding the complicated context.<n>Our approach achieves superior performance compared with strong baselines, validating its effectiveness for search-based recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T16:46:11Z) - Veri-R1: Toward Precise and Faithful Claim Verification via Online Reinforcement Learning [53.05161493434908]
Claim verification with large language models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention, due to their strong reasoning capabilities and transparent verification processes.<n>We introduce Veri-R1, an online reinforcement learning framework that enables an LLM to interact with a search engine and to receive reward signals that explicitly shape its planning, retrieval, and reasoning behaviors.<n> Empirical results show that Veri-R1 improves joint accuracy by up to 30% and doubles the evidence score, often surpassing its larger-scale model counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-02T11:49:48Z) - Re-ranking Reasoning Context with Tree Search Makes Large Vision-Language Models Stronger [51.01841635655944]
Recent advancements in Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have significantly improved performance in Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks.<n>Existing methods still face challenges, such as the scarcity of knowledge with reasoning examples and erratic responses from retrieved knowledge.<n>We propose a multimodal RAG framework, termed RCTS, which enhances LVLMs by constructing a Reasoning Context-enriched knowledge base and a Tree Search re-ranking method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T14:00:57Z) - KnowTrace: Bootstrapping Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Structured Knowledge Tracing [64.38243807002878]
We present KnowTrace, an elegant RAG framework to mitigate the context overload in large language models.<n>KnowTrace autonomously traces out desired knowledge triplets to organize a specific knowledge graph relevant to the input question.<n>It consistently surpasses existing methods across three multi-hop question answering benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T17:22:20Z) - Search and Refine During Think: Facilitating Knowledge Refinement for Improved Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [35.35813310224967]
Large language models have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities but are inherently limited by their knowledge reservoir.<n>Retrieval-augmented reasoning mitigates this limitation by allowing LLMs to query external resources.<n>We propose AutoRefine, a reinforcement learning framework that adopts a new "search-and-refine-during-think" paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T14:11:29Z) - Scent of Knowledge: Optimizing Search-Enhanced Reasoning with Information Foraging [7.047640531842663]
InForage is a reinforcement learning framework that formalizes retrieval-augmented reasoning as a dynamic information-seeking process.<n>We construct a human-guided dataset capturing iterative search and reasoning trajectories for complex, real-world web tasks.<n>These results highlight InForage's effectiveness in building robust, adaptive, and efficient reasoning agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-14T12:13:38Z) - SEM: Reinforcement Learning for Search-Efficient Large Language Models [26.075903427834838]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their capabilities not only in reasoning but also in invoking external tools.<n>Existing reinforcement learning approaches often lead to redundant search behaviors, resulting in inefficiencies and over-cost.<n>We propose SEM, a novel post-training reinforcement learning framework that explicitly trains LLMs to optimize search usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T09:45:40Z) - R1-Searcher: Incentivizing the Search Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [87.30285670315334]
textbfR1-Searcher is a novel two-stage outcome-based RL approach designed to enhance the search capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Our framework relies exclusively on RL, without requiring process rewards or distillation for a cold start.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms previous strong RAG methods, even when compared to the closed-source GPT-4o-mini.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T17:14:44Z) - Contextualizing Search Queries In-Context Learning for Conversational Rewriting with LLMs [0.0]
This paper introduces Prompt-Guided In-Context Learning, a novel approach for few-shot conversational query rewriting.<n>Our method employs carefully designed prompts, incorporating task descriptions, input/output format specifications, and a small set of illustrative examples.<n>Experiments on benchmark datasets, TREC and Taskmaster-1, demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T20:02:42Z) - VERA: Validation and Enhancement for Retrieval Augmented systems [0.0]
We propose textbfVERA (textbfValidation and textbfEnhancement for textbfRetrieval textbfAugmented systems), a system designed to evaluate and enhance the retrieved context before response generation.
VERA employs an evaluator-cum-enhancer LLM that first checks if external retrieval is necessary, evaluates the relevance and redundancy of the retrieved context, and refines it to eliminate non-essential information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T16:10:47Z) - Retrieval Meets Reasoning: Dynamic In-Context Editing for Long-Text Understanding [11.5386284281652]
We introduce a novel approach that re-imagines information retrieval through dynamic in-context editing.
By treating lengthy contexts as malleable external knowledge, our method interactively gathers and integrates relevant information.
Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively empowers context-limited LLMs to engage in multi-hop reasoning with improved performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T06:54:28Z) - Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for
Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections.
InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.