Enhancing Low-Resource Language Reasoning via High-Resource Language Feature Transfer

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30462v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 08:47:41 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Low-Resource Language Reasoning via High-Resource Language Feature Transfer
• Abstract summary: High-resource languages (HRLs) may more reliably elicit latent computations useful for task-specific (i.e. mathematical) reasoning.<n>We introduce a mechanistic intervention framework for identifying and transferring task-relevant sparse latent features across languages.<n>Our framework reframes some cross-lingual reasoning gaps as failures of mechanism elicitation rather than capability absence.
• Score: 19.534545214053527
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models exhibit substantial performance variation across languages, even when solving semantically equivalent tasks. Existing analyses often treat this phenomenon as an observational disparity caused by differences in pretraining data, tokenization, or benchmark coverage. We study a complementary hypothesis: high-resource languages (HRLs) may more reliably elicit latent computations useful for task-specific (i.e. mathematical) reasoning, while lower-resource languages (LRLs) may under-activate those computations despite expressing the same task. To test this hypothesis, we introduce a mechanistic intervention framework for identifying and transferring task-relevant sparse latent features across languages. Using sparse autoencoders over residual-stream activations, we isolate features enriched in successful HRL task-specific reasoning while filtering out source-language and generic-generation features. We then construct steering directions from these features and inject them during LRL inference. The resulting interventions test whether the selected features are functionally involved in the observed reasoning gap: suppressing them should impair source-language reasoning, while activating them should partially recover target-language reasoning beyond random and non-task controls. Our framework reframes some cross-lingual reasoning gaps as failures of mechanism elicitation rather than capability absence, and offers a causally testable route to feature-mediated transfer without translation, fine-tuning, or changing the user-facing language.

Related papers

• Cross-lingual Functional Vectors for Emotion Detection in Large Language Models [2.3567984677073945]
  Function vectors (FVs) have emerged as a promising mechanism for steering the behavior of large language models.<n>We investigate the cross-lingual transferability of FVs using multilingual multi-label emotion recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-30T07:08:36Z)
• Crosslingual On-Policy Self-Distillation for Multilingual Reasoning [48.68444770923683]
  Crosslingual On-Policy Self-Distillation (COPSD) transfers a model's own high-resource reasoning behavior to low-resource languages.<n>Experiments on 17 low-resource African languages show that COPSD consistently improves low-resource mathematical reasoning across model sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T14:06:09Z)
• Translation or Recitation? Calibrating Evaluation Scores for Machine Translation of Extremely Low-Resource Languages [39.985923582735936]
  We introduce the FRED Difficulty Metrics, which include the Fertility Ratio (F), Retrieval Proxy (R), Pre-training Exposure (E) and Corpus Diversity (D)<n>These metrics reveal that a significant portion of result variability is explained by train-test overlap and pre-training exposure rather than model capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T09:20:17Z)
• Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models? [59.970391602080205]
  Despite multilingual training, LRMs tend to default to reasoning in high-resource languages at test time.<n>Cultural reasoning degrades performance on reasoning tasks but benefits cultural tasks, while safety evaluations exhibit language-specific behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T02:46:18Z)
• Mechanistic Understanding and Mitigation of Language Confusion in English-Centric Large Language Models [56.61984030508691]
  We present the first mechanistic interpretability study of language confusion.<n>We show that confusion points (CPs) are central to this phenomenon.<n>We show that editing a small set of critical neurons, identified via comparative analysis with a multilingual-tuned counterpart, substantially mitigates confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T11:29:17Z)
• When Less Language is More: Language-Reasoning Disentanglement Makes LLMs Better Multilingual Reasoners [111.50503126693444]
  We show that language-specific ablation consistently boosts multilingual reasoning performance.<n>Compared to post-training, our training-free ablation achieves comparable or superior results with minimal computational overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T08:35:05Z)
• AdaMCoT: Rethinking Cross-Lingual Factual Reasoning through Adaptive Multilingual Chain-of-Thought [40.16140566668239]
  We introduce AdaMCOT, a framework that enhances multilingual factual reasoning.<n>AdaMCOT dynamically routing thought processes in intermediary "thinking languages" before generating target-language responses.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates substantial improvements in both factual reasoning quality and cross-lingual consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T15:48:57Z)
• SMILE: Speech Meta In-Context Learning for Low-Resource Language Automatic Speech Recognition [55.2480439325792]
  Speech Meta In-Context LEarning (SMILE) is an innovative framework that combines meta-learning with speech in-context learning (SICL)<n>We show that SMILE consistently outperforms baseline methods in training-free few-shot multilingual ASR tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T16:04:16Z)
• Cross-Lingual Transfer Robustness to Lower-Resource Languages on Adversarial Datasets [4.653113033432781]
  Cross-lingual transfer capabilities of Multilingual Language Models (MLLMs) are investigated. Our research provides valuable insights into cross-lingual transfer and its implications for NLP applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T08:47:15Z)
• Analyzing and Reducing the Performance Gap in Cross-Lingual Transfer with Fine-tuning Slow and Fast [50.19681990847589]
  Existing research has shown that a multilingual pre-trained language model fine-tuned with one (source) language also performs well on downstream tasks for non-source languages. This paper analyzes the fine-tuning process, discovers when the performance gap changes and identifies which network weights affect the overall performance most.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T06:04:21Z)
• It's All in the Heads: Using Attention Heads as a Baseline for Cross-Lingual Transfer in Commonsense Reasoning [4.200736775540874]
  We design a simple approach to commonsense reasoning which trains a linear classifier with weights of multi-head attention as features. The method performs competitively with recent supervised and unsupervised approaches for commonsense reasoning. Most of the performance is given by the same small subset of attention heads for all studied languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T21:25:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.