Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.31007v1
• Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:56:28 GMT
• Title: Augmenting Interviewer Judgments of Patient Experience with Automatic Language Analysis
• Abstract summary: We evaluate a framework in which post-session interviewer ratings are combined with automatic language-based predictions to estimate patient-reported interaction quality.<n>Our results show that combining judgments with model predictions through simple averaging yields the strongest overall performance.
• Score: 16.974270554477
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding how psychiatric patients subjectively experienced a clinical conversation is important for feedback and alliance-related process monitoring. While interviewers form post-session judgments about patient experience, these judgments do not always match patients' self-reports. Automatic approaches for predicting perceived interaction quality from conversation have been proposed, but it remains unclear whether such approaches can complement human judgment rather than simply replicate it. To address this gap, we evaluate a clinician-support framework in which post-session interviewer ratings are combined with automatic language-based predictions to estimate patient-reported interaction quality in free clinical interviews. We assess this integration across multiple standard model types, including Ridge, SVR, MLP, GRU, and BiLSTM, all trained on sentence embeddings extracted from dyadic transcripts of 107 free conversations between psychiatric patients and interviewers. Our results show that combining interviewer judgments with model predictions through simple averaging yields the strongest overall performance. The interviewer-only baseline reached a Pearson correlation of 0.365. Among fully automatic models, Ridge achieved the strongest Pearson correlation (r = 0.286), while BiLSTM achieved r = 0.270. The strongest result was obtained by BiLSTM interviewer integration (r = 0.403). Our findings suggest that automatic language analysis and interviewer judgment capture complementary aspects of patient experience and that their combination provides a more accurate approximation of the patient's own report than either source alone.

Related papers

• Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
  Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z)
• MedArena: Comparing LLMs for Medicine-in-the-Wild Clinician Preferences [50.71326426975699]
  We present MedArena, an interactive evaluation platform for medical large language models (LLMs)<n>Given a clinician-provided query, MedArena presents responses from two randomly selected models and asks the user to select the preferred response.<n>Out of 1571 preferences collected across 12 LLMs up to November 1, 2025, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-4o were the top three models by Bradley-Terry rating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T22:30:26Z)
• Analyzing Cancer Patients' Experiences with Embedding-based Topic Modeling and LLMs [10.268667230396058]
  This study investigates the use of neural topic modeling and LLMs to uncover meaningful themes from patient storytelling data.<n>We analyze a collection of transcribed interviews with cancer patients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T20:06:14Z)
• WER is Unaware: Assessing How ASR Errors Distort Clinical Understanding in Patient Facing Dialogue [3.468314243424983]
  Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is increasingly deployed in clinical dialogue.<n>Standard evaluations still rely heavily on Error Error Rate (WER)<n>This paper challenges that standard, investigating whether WER or other common metrics correlate with clinical impact of transcription errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T16:59:20Z)
• Mapping Patient-Perceived Physician Traits from Nationwide Online Reviews with LLMs [3.364244912862208]
  We present a large language model (LLM)-based pipeline that infers Big Five personality traits and five patient subjective judgments.<n>The analysis encompasses 4.1 million patient reviews of 226,999 U.S. physicians from an initial pool of one million.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T02:16:35Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• A Comparative Study on Patient Language across Therapeutic Domains for Effective Patient Voice Classification in Online Health Discussions [0.48124799513933847]
  In this study, we analyse the importance of linguistic characteristics in accurately classifying patient voices. We fine-tuned a pre-trained Language Model on the combined datasets with similar linguistic patterns, resulting in a highly accurate automatic patient voice classification. Being the pioneering study on the topic, our focus on extracting authentic patient experiences from social media stands as a crucial step towards advancing healthcare standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:51:46Z)
• LLM Questionnaire Completion for Automatic Psychiatric Assessment [49.1574468325115]
  We employ a Large Language Model (LLM) to convert unstructured psychological interviews into structured questionnaires spanning various psychiatric and personality domains. The obtained answers are coded as features, which are used to predict standardized psychiatric measures of depression (PHQ-8) and PTSD (PCL-C)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T09:03:11Z)
• Automatically measuring speech fluency in people with aphasia: first achievements using read-speech data [55.84746218227712]
  This study aims at assessing the relevance of a signalprocessingalgorithm, initially developed in the field of language acquisition, for the automatic measurement of speech fluency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T07:51:40Z)
• MedNgage: A Dataset for Understanding Engagement in Patient-Nurse Conversations [4.847266237348932]
  Patients who effectively manage their symptoms often demonstrate higher levels of engagement in conversations and interventions with healthcare practitioners. It is crucial for AI systems to understand the engagement in natural conversations between patients and practitioners to better contribute toward patient care. We present a novel dataset (MedNgage) which consists of patient-nurse conversations about cancer symptom management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T16:06:07Z)
• COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matching [70.08786840301435]
  We propose CrOss-Modal PseudO-SiamEse network (COMPOSE) to address these challenges for patient-trial matching. Experiment results show COMPOSE can reach 98.0% AUC on patient-criteria matching and 83.7% accuracy on patient-trial matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T21:01:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.