From Truncation to Commitment: Persistent Context in Uniform Discrete Diffusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01043v1
• Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 10:43:24 GMT
• Title: From Truncation to Commitment: Persistent Context in Uniform Discrete Diffusion
• Abstract summary: Uniform-state discrete diffusion models update all tokens in parallel while keeping every position revisable.<n>We propose committed reveal sampling (CRS), a training-free sampler that stores selected argmax tokens and inserts them into subsequent model inputs.
• Score: 5.2262942936091905
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Uniform-state discrete diffusion models update all tokens in parallel while keeping every position revisable. Even when the commonly used top-$p$ rule leaves only one candidate at a position, that choice affects only the current reverse step and can be revised at the next sampling step. We ask what changes when selected hypotheses instead become persistent context for later predictions. We therefore propose committed reveal sampling (CRS), a training-free sampler that stores selected argmax tokens and inserts them into subsequent model inputs. Our analysis gives a rationale for selecting later and for keeping selected tokens visible. Under the exact forward process, the Bayes error of selecting a clean token cannot increase as noise decreases, while in a simple latent-mode model, keeping the selected token visible helps later parallel predictions agree on the same sequence-level choice. Empirically, paired experiments on Duo-distilled then separate this persistent effect from single-step top-$p$ restriction and scalar temperature scaling. Under the same finalization rule, CRS without top-$p$ truncation reaches lower generative perplexity (GenPPL) than fixed $p=0.95$ and $p=0.9$ baselines across budgets of 8--64 function evaluations (NFE). At 64 NFE, the comparison at matched unigram entropy also gives lower GenPPL for CRS, yielding a more favorable GenPPL--entropy tradeoff. Base Duo shows the same direction in a descriptive comparison, while other diversity and continuation metrics can rank these operating points differently. These results identify support restriction and persistent context as distinct controls of that tradeoff.

Related papers

• Constrained Online Learning with Noisy Constraint Values [55.29259818039367]
  Under common feasibility, our LEDGER algorithm attains $O(sqrt T)$ expected regret and $O(sqrtTlog(eT))$ expected budget violation.<n>Neither a Slater condition, independence between feedback channels, nor an absolute constraint-value bound is needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T01:38:41Z)
• Adversarial Online Classification with a Preview [17.495168716195476]
  Worst-case online classification is governed by sequential complexity, such as Littlestone dimension.<n>We show that a random preview can replace worst-case sequential complexity by classical statistical dimensions without randomizing the online order.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-30T01:38:49Z)
• Provably adaptive sampling with uniform and remasking discrete diffusion models [9.180350432640912]
  We study a first-order sampler based on the leave-one-out denoiser for uniform and remasking processes.<n>Our main result establishes an adaptive sampling guarantee.<n> Numerical experiments on structured synthetic distributions illustrate the predicted dimension-adaptive behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-24T17:54:51Z)
• Robust Average-Reward Markov Decision Processes: Minimax-Optimal Learning via Plug-in Reductions [51.50375419691955]
  Distributionally robust Markov decision processes provide a principled framework for sequential decision making under model uncertainty.<n>We study how many samples are necessary and sufficient to learn an $varepsilon$-optimal robust policy under the average-reward criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-06T19:49:48Z)
• Correction and Corruption: A Two-Rate View of Error Flow in LLM Protocols [51.56484100374058]
  We propose a paired-outcome measurement interface for auditing a single protocol step on exact-match tasks.<n>For each instance, the interface records a baseline correctness bit and a post-step correctness bit.<n>These rates predict accuracy changes and define a reusable empirical interface testable across seeds, mixtures, and pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T13:25:40Z)
• Post-Training with Policy Gradients: Optimality and the Base Model Barrier [27.674563695368665]
  We study post-training linear autoregressive models with outcome and process rewards.<n>We prove that variants of policy gradient (PG) can achieve likelihood $1 - varepsilon$ with an essentially minimax optimal number of reward queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-07T00:25:53Z)
• Global Resolution: Optimal Multi-Draft Speculative Sampling via Convex Minimization [1.2674961594128336]
  We devise an algorithm for optimal speculative sampling when the $n$ tokens are chosen from a single draft model.<n>Our findings give the first multi-draft algorithm with 90% acceptance and under 100 ms of overhead per generated token with negligible deviation from the target model distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T21:59:43Z)
• DISCO: Diversifying Sample Condensation for Efficient Model Evaluation [59.01400190971061]
  Costly evaluation reduces inclusivity, slows the cycle of innovation, and worsens environmental impact.<n>We argue that promoting diversity among samples is not essential; what matters is to select samples thatmaximise diversity in model responses.<n>Our method, $textbfDiversifying Sample Condensation (DISCO)$, selects the top-k samples with the greatest model disagreements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T08:53:59Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Adversarial Preferences in Tabular MDPs [62.73758165845971]
  We introduce a new framework of episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs) with adversarial preferences.<n>Unlike standard episodic MDPs with adversarial losses, in PbMDPs the learner instead observes preferences between two candidate arms.<n>We develop algorithms that achieve a regret bound of order $T2/3$ under known transitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T20:19:32Z)
• From Continual Learning to SGD and Back: Better Rates for Continual Linear Models [50.11453013647086]
  We analyze the forgetting, i.e., loss on previously seen tasks, after $k$ iterations.<n>We develop novel last-iterate upper bounds in the realizable least squares setup.<n>We prove for the first time that randomization alone, with no task repetition, can prevent catastrophic in sufficiently long task sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T18:39:45Z)
• Autoregressive Bandits [58.46584210388307]
  We propose a novel online learning setting, Autoregressive Bandits, in which the observed reward is governed by an autoregressive process of order $k$. We show that, under mild assumptions on the reward process, the optimal policy can be conveniently computed. We then devise a new optimistic regret minimization algorithm, namely, AutoRegressive Upper Confidence Bound (AR-UCB), that suffers sublinear regret of order $widetildemathcalO left( frac(k+1)3/2sqrtnT (1-G
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T21:37:36Z)
• Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs [70.57916977441262]
  We investigate the problem of best identification in discounted linear Markov+Delta Decision in the fixed confidence setting under a generative model. The lower bound as the solution of an intricate non- optimization program can be used as the starting point to devise such algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T04:12:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.