Evaluating ML-based Intrusion Detection Systems: The Illusion of Model Efficacy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02469v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 11:39:02 GMT
• Title: Evaluating ML-based Intrusion Detection Systems: The Illusion of Model Efficacy
• Abstract summary: Intrusion Detection has been revolutionized due to the integration of Machine Learning.<n>In this paper, we go beyond solely algorithmic enhancements and metric adjustments in ML-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Intrusion Detection has been revolutionized due to the integration of Machine Learning. Improved detection rates, reduced false alarms, and optimized algorithms contribute to the perception of improved systems with optimal accuracy and near-perfect performance, the illusion of model efficacy. However, the value of this effectiveness diminishes when confronted with unseen attacks. In this paper, we go beyond solely algorithmic enhancements and metric adjustments in ML-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems. We design an experiment to test the generalization capabilities of certain classifiers on unseen attacks. Our approach examines the dimensionality parameter's impact through two experimental methodologies, which are applied in two distinct settings. The experimental findings reveal how effectively the models could identify even a fraction of unseen attacks and underscore structural weaknesses in ML-based IDS research and evaluation techniques. Finally, seven evaluation criteria are outlined to address these challenges.

Related papers

• Low Rank Adaptation for Adversarial Perturbation [50.24377354110586]
  Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has significantly improved the training efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Since the generation of adversarial examples is an optimization process analogous to model training, this naturally raises the question: Do adversarial perturbations exhibit a similar low-rank structure?<n>In this paper, we provide both theoretical analysis and extensive empirical investigation across various attack methods, model architectures, and datasets to show that adversarial perturbations indeed possess a low-rank structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T06:38:28Z)
• What Works for 'Lost-in-the-Middle' in LLMs? A Study on GM-Extract and Mitigations [1.2879523047871226]
  GM-Extract is a novel benchmark dataset meticulously designed to evaluate LLM performance on retrieval of control variables.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of 7-8B parameter models on two multi-document tasks (key-value extraction and question-answering)<n>While a distinct U-shaped curve was not consistently observed, our analysis reveals a clear pattern of performance across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T20:50:50Z)
• A methodological analysis of prompt perturbations and their effect on attack success rates [0.5387033080274478]
  This work aims to investigate how different Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment methods affect the models' responses to prompt attacks.<n>We selected open source models based on the most common alignment methods, namely, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T19:39:33Z)
• ARISE: An Adaptive Resolution-Aware Metric for Test-Time Scaling Evaluation in Large Reasoning Models [102.4511331368587]
  ARISE (Adaptive Resolution-aware Scaling Evaluation) is a novel metric designed to assess the test-time scaling effectiveness of large reasoning models.<n>We conduct comprehensive experiments evaluating state-of-the-art reasoning models across diverse domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T15:10:51Z)
• Impacts of Data Preprocessing and Hyperparameter Optimization on the Performance of Machine Learning Models Applied to Intrusion Detection Systems [0.8388591755871736]
  Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) have been continuously improved. Many of them incorporate machine learning (ML) techniques to identify threats. This article aims to present a study that fills this research gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T14:30:25Z)
• Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning-based Network Intrusion Detection System [3.4636217357968904]
  Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) play a crucial role in ensuring the security of computer networks. We propose a novel multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) architecture, enabling automatic, efficient, and robust network intrusion detection. Our solution introduces a resilient architecture designed to accommodate the addition of new attacks and effectively adapt to changes in existing attack patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T09:18:59Z)
• Improving robustness of jet tagging algorithms with adversarial training [56.79800815519762]
  We investigate the vulnerability of flavor tagging algorithms via application of adversarial attacks. We present an adversarial training strategy that mitigates the impact of such simulated attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T19:57:19Z)
• Meta-learning One-class Classifiers with Eigenvalue Solvers for Supervised Anomaly Detection [55.888835686183995]
  We propose a neural network-based meta-learning method for supervised anomaly detection. We experimentally demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better performance than existing anomaly detection and few-shot learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T01:43:04Z)
• A Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method for Probabilistic Adversarial Attack and Learning [122.49765136434353]
  We present an effective method, called Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Accumulated Momentum (HMCAM), aiming to generate a sequence of adversarial examples. We also propose a new generative method called Contrastive Adversarial Training (CAT), which approaches equilibrium distribution of adversarial examples. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis on several natural image datasets and practical systems have confirmed the superiority of the proposed algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:07:26Z)
• Multi-Stage Optimized Machine Learning Framework for Network Intrusion Detection [8.26773636337474]
  This paper proposes a novel multi-stage optimized ML-based NIDS framework. It reduces computational complexity while maintaining its detection performance. The proposed framework significantly reduces the required training sample size (up to 74%) and feature set size (up to 50%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-09T03:18:00Z)
• Bayesian Optimization with Machine Learning Algorithms Towards Anomaly Detection [66.05992706105224]
  In this paper, an effective anomaly detection framework is proposed utilizing Bayesian Optimization technique. The performance of the considered algorithms is evaluated using the ISCX 2012 dataset. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the proposed framework in term of accuracy rate, precision, low-false alarm rate, and recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T19:29:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.