What Works for 'Lost-in-the-Middle' in LLMs? A Study on GM-Extract and Mitigations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13900v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 20:50:50 GMT
• Title: What Works for 'Lost-in-the-Middle' in LLMs? A Study on GM-Extract and Mitigations
• Authors: Mihir Gupte, Eshan Dixit, Muhammad Tayyab, Arun Adiththan,
• Abstract summary: GM-Extract is a novel benchmark dataset meticulously designed to evaluate LLM performance on retrieval of control variables.<n>We conduct a systematic evaluation of 7-8B parameter models on two multi-document tasks (key-value extraction and question-answering)<n>While a distinct U-shaped curve was not consistently observed, our analysis reveals a clear pattern of performance across models.
• Score: 1.2879523047871226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The diminishing ability of large language models (LLMs) to effectively utilize long-range context-the "lost-in-the-middle" phenomenon-poses a significant challenge in retrieval-based LLM applications. To study the impact of this phenomenon in a real-world application setting, we introduce GM-Extract, a novel benchmark dataset meticulously designed to evaluate LLM performance on retrieval of control variables. To accurately diagnose failure modes, we propose a simple yet elegant evaluation system using two distinct metrics: one for spatial retrieval capability (Document Metric) and the other for semantic retrieval capability (Variable Extraction Metric). We conduct a systematic evaluation of 7-8B parameter models on two multi-document tasks (key-value extraction and question-answering), demonstrating a significant change in retrieval performance simply by altering how the data is represented in the context window. While a distinct U-shaped curve was not consistently observed, our analysis reveals a clear pattern of performance across models, which we further correlate with perplexity scores. Furthermore, we perform a literature survey of mitigation methods, which we categorize into two distinct approaches: black-box and white-box methods. We then apply these techniques to our benchmark, finding that their efficacy is highly nuanced. Our evaluation highlights scenarios where these strategies successfully improve performance, as well as surprising cases where they lead to a negative impact, providing a comprehensive understanding of their utility in a practical context.

Related papers

• UniME-V2: MLLM-as-a-Judge for Universal Multimodal Embedding Learning [101.62386137855704]
  We present a novel Universal Multimodal Embedding (UniME-V2) model.<n>Our approach first constructs a potential hard negative set through global retrieval.<n>We then introduce the MLLM-as-a-Judge mechanism, which utilizes MLLMs to assess the semantic alignment of query-candidate pairs.<n>These scores serve as a foundation for hard negative mining, mitigating the impact of false negatives and enabling the identification of diverse, high-quality hard negatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T13:07:00Z)
• LLM Unlearning Under the Microscope: A Full-Stack View on Methods and Metrics [10.638045151201084]
  We present a principled taxonomy of twelve recent stateful unlearning methods.<n>We revisit the evaluation of unlearning effectiveness (UE), utility retention (UT), and robustness (Rob)<n>Our analysis shows that current evaluations, dominated by multiple-choice question (MCQ) accuracy, offer only a narrow perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T23:47:05Z)
• How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models [24.90505576458548]
  We evaluate state-of-the-art reranking methods, including large language model (LLM)-based, lightweight contextual, and zero-shot approaches.<n>Our primary goal is to determine, through controlled and fair comparisons, whether a performance disparity exists between LLM-based rerankers and their lightweight counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T19:30:04Z)
• Data-efficient Meta-models for Evaluation of Context-based Questions and Answers in LLMs [1.6332728502735252]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly deployed in industry applications.<n>Their reliability remains hampered by challenges in detecting hallucinations.<n>This paper addresses the bottleneck of data annotation by investigating the feasibility of reducing training data requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T09:50:56Z)
• Towards Robust Universal Information Extraction: Benchmark, Evaluation, and Solution [66.11004226578771]
  Existing robust benchmark datasets have two key limitations.<n>They generate only a limited range of perturbations for a single Information Extraction (IE) task.<n>Considering the powerful generation capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we introduce a new benchmark dataset for Robust UIE, called RUIE-Bench.<n>We show that training with only textbf15% of the data leads to an average textbf7.5% relative performance improvement across three IE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:39:29Z)
• Adaptive Distraction: Probing LLM Contextual Robustness with Automated Tree Search [76.54475437069395]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to maintain their original performance when faced with semantically coherent but task-irrelevant contextual information.<n>We propose a dynamic distraction generation framework based on tree search, where the generation process is guided by model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:43:36Z)
• Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learning [65.23593936798662]
  We show that fine-tuning with LLM-generated data improves target task performance and reduces non-target task degradation.<n>This is the first work to provide an empirical explanation based on token perplexity reduction to mitigate catastrophic forgetting in LLMs after fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T08:18:56Z)
• Dissecting Representation Misalignment in Contrastive Learning via Influence Function [15.28417468377201]
  We introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss.<n>ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models.<n>Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T15:45:41Z)
• THaMES: An End-to-End Tool for Hallucination Mitigation and Evaluation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Hallucination, the generation of factually incorrect content, is a growing challenge in Large Language Models.<n>This paper introduces THaMES, an integrated framework and library addressing this gap.<n> THaMES offers an end-to-end solution for evaluating and mitigating hallucinations in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T16:55:25Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based Visual Analytics Perspective [7.577040836988683]
  Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling. Current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction. This study proposes a Contrastive Learning framework to model observed data with missing values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T13:16:24Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.