Choosing the Right Language Mode at Inference Time for Multilingual Reliability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04653v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:36:26 GMT
• Title: Choosing the Right Language Mode at Inference Time for Multilingual Reliability
• Abstract summary: Large language models often struggle to reason in low- to mid-resource languages.<n>Prior work has shown that translation can improve multilingual reasoning by helping models access stronger English-centric representations.<n>This raises a central question: How much translation is needed for multilingual large language models to reason reliably.
• Score: 3.6095388702618405
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multilingual large language models often struggle to reason in low- to mid-resource languages. Prior work has shown that translation can improve multilingual reasoning by helping models access stronger English-centric representations. This raises a central question: How much translation is needed for multilingual large language models to reason reliably, and when does more translation instead trigger interference and overconfidence? Using LLaMA and Qwen models, we run extensive experiments varying text scope and language mode (target-only, English-only, bilingual) to evaluate both accuracy and reliability. Our results reveal a clear trade-off: English context often improve understanding and recover errors caused by non-English comprehension, yet adding redundant bilingual context intensifies interference. We address this trade-off with Reliability-Aware Adaptive Inference (RAAI), a training-free test-time framework that (i) performs Expected Calibration Error (ECE)-aware routing and prompt fusion, and (ii) uses a mid-layer Risk Index (RI) to gate sequential reasoning, allocating compute only when it is likely to help and suppressing harmful bilingual redundancy. Across two model families, RAAI enhances accuracy by 25-37.7% on low-resource languages and lowers calibration error by approximately 3-6%, with the most pronounced benefits in the lowest-resource language tiers.

Related papers

• Building Multilingual Bridges: Data Mixing as the Pillar of Generalization for In-Language Reasoning [75.46846056993418]
  Reasoning language models primarily reason in English regardless of the language they are prompted in.<n>This is inaccessible for non-English-speaking users, risks losing the intent of the original question, and forgoes knowledge more readily expressed in the target language.<n>In this work, we advance L2 reasoning, the ability of a model to reason consistently in the language of the user's prompt, thus building an in-language bridge between the prompt and the answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-09T16:56:25Z)
• M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models [0.0]
  M-GATE is a benchmark of linguistic proficiency spanning 30 typologically diverse languages.<n>We evaluate over 50 models in more than 80 configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T15:16:05Z)
• Inference-Time Steering for Cross-Lingual Factual Consistency in LLMs [51.56484100374058]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable multilingual fluency, but their internal knowledge representations remain disproportionately biased toward high-resource languages.<n>We investigate whether these biases can be mitigated at inference time, forcing an English-prompted model to answer as if it were queried in target languages.<n>Experiments on Gemma 3 12B Instruct reveal persona prompting to be the strongest overall intervention, balancing efficacy, safety, and out-of-domain generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-21T16:15:05Z)
• Learning When to Translate for Multilingual Reasoning [20.51941069559769]
  Reasoning language models (RLMs) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, but still exhibit substantial multilingual reasoning gaps.<n>English translation can mitigate these failures by expressing non-English inputs in a form that RLMs can more reliably interpret.<n>We propose Luar, a Language Understanding Boundary-aware Reinforcement Learning framework that trains RLMs to selectively invoke translation when direct understanding is unreliable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T16:37:18Z)
• Crosslingual On-Policy Self-Distillation for Multilingual Reasoning [48.68444770923683]
  Crosslingual On-Policy Self-Distillation (COPSD) transfers a model's own high-resource reasoning behavior to low-resource languages.<n>Experiments on 17 low-resource African languages show that COPSD consistently improves low-resource mathematical reasoning across model sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T14:06:09Z)
• Align to the Pivot: Dual Alignment with Self-Feedback for Multilingual Math Reasoning [71.4175109189942]
  We present Pivot-Aligned Self-Feedback Multilingual Reasoning (PASMR)<n>This approach designates the model's primary language as the pivot language.<n>It establishes a cross-lingual self-feedback mechanism without relying on external correct answers or reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T03:20:00Z)
• Investigating the Multilingual Calibration Effects of Language Model Instruction-Tuning [58.355275813623685]
  This work looks at a critical gap in the calibration of large language models (LLMs) within multilingual settings.<n>Even in low-resource languages, model confidence can increase significantly after instruction-tuning on high-resource language SFT datasets.<n>However, improvements in accuracy are marginal or non-existent, highlighting a critical shortcoming of standard SFT for multilingual languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-04T04:29:12Z)
• Think Natively: Unlocking Multilingual Reasoning with Consistency-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning [85.7304930030649]
  We propose M-Thinker, which is trained by a Language Consistency reward and a Cross-lingual Thinking Alignment reward.<n>M-Thinker achieves nearly 100% language consistency and superior performance on two multilingual benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-08T17:55:02Z)
• Cross-lingual Collapse: How Language-Centric Foundation Models Shape Reasoning in Large Language Models [44.94287386776289]
  We identify textbfCross-lingual Collapse, a systematic drift in which a multilingual language model reverts to its dominant pre-training language.<n>Our experiments reveal three key findings: (i) GRPO rapidly amplifies pre-training language imbalances, leading to the erosion of low-resource languages within just a few hundred updates; (ii) language consistency reward mitigates this drift but does so at the expense of an almost 5 - 10 pp drop in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T08:08:48Z)
• Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipeline [36.2731426595852]
  We find that multilingual large language models (LLMs) exhibit significantly better performance in factual recall tasks in English than in other languages.<n>We identify two primary sources of error: insufficient engagement of the reliable English-centric mechanism for factual recall, and incorrect translation from English back into the target language.<n>Our interventions combined increase the recall accuracy by over 35 percent for the lowest-performing language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T22:20:45Z)
• A Comparative Study of Translation Bias and Accuracy in Multilingual Large Language Models for Cross-Language Claim Verification [1.566834021297545]
  This study systematically evaluates translation bias and the effectiveness of Large Language Models for cross-lingual claim verification. We investigate two distinct translation methods: pre-translation and self-translation. Our findings reveal that low-resource languages exhibit significantly lower accuracy in direct inference due to underrepresentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T09:02:42Z)
• The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
  We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance. Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes. We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.