Beyond the Prank: The Hidden Expertise of TSS Scambaiters

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06103v1
• Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2026 13:54:59 GMT
• Title: Beyond the Prank: The Hidden Expertise of TSS Scambaiters
• Abstract summary: This research studies how Technical Support Scams are being countered by a uniquely dedicated community of volunteer counter-fraud operatives.<n>We interviewed 17 individuals who actively engage in TSS scambaiting activities in order to obtain insight into their motivations, the operational methods of the scammers they combat, and the various challenges scambaiters face.
• Score: 1.3293587768680066
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This research studies how Technical Support Scams (TSS) are being countered by a uniquely dedicated community of volunteer counter-fraud operatives. Using a careful subject selection strategy, we interviewed 17 individuals who actively engage in TSS scambaiting activities in order to obtain insight into their motivations, the operational methods of the scammers they combat, the undocumented nuances of effective scambaiting action, and the various challenges scambaiters face. In our analysis, we find a community rich not only with insight into offenders, but with technical and operational expertise that is often lacking in research efforts targeting these same populations. At the same time, we find key areas where the community could be better supported and enabled. We discuss the implications of our findings for both future research and community protection strategies.

Related papers

• When AI Agents Collude Online: Financial Fraud Risks by Collaborative LLM Agents on Social Platforms [101.2197679948061]
  We study the risks of collective financial fraud in large-scale multi-agent systems powered by large language model (LLM) agents.<n>We present MultiAgentFraudBench, a large-scale benchmark for simulating financial fraud scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T16:30:44Z)
• The Hunger Game Debate: On the Emergence of Over-Competition in Multi-Agent Systems [90.96738882568224]
  This paper investigates the over-competition in multi-agent debate, where agents under extreme pressure exhibit unreliable, harmful behaviors.<n>To study this phenomenon, we propose HATE, a novel experimental framework that simulates debates under a zero-sum competition arena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T11:44:47Z)
• "It Warned Me Just at the Right Moment": Exploring LLM-based Real-time Detection of Phone Scams [21.992539308179126]
  We propose a framework for modeling scam calls and introduce an LLM-based real-time detection approach.<n>We evaluate the method's performance and analyze key factors influencing its effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T10:57:05Z)
• Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives [47.17703009473386]
  Powerful AI models have led to impressive leaps in performance across a wide range of tasks. Privacy concerns have led to a wealth of literature covering various privacy risks and vulnerabilities of AI models. We conduct a systematic review of these survey papers to provide a concise and usable overview of privacy risks in GPAIS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T07:49:48Z)
• Tracing the Unseen: Uncovering Human Trafficking Patterns in Job Listings [9.450459784653196]
  We analyze over a quarter million job postings collected from eight relevant regions across the United States, spanning nearly two decades (2006-2024) Our investigation into the types of advertised opportunities, the modes of preferred contact, and the frequency of postings uncovers the patterns characterizing suspicious ads. This research underscores the imperative for a deeper dive into how online job boards and communication platforms could be unwitting facilitators of human trafficking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T10:18:15Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Fast Peer Adaptation with Context-aware Exploration [63.08444527039578]
  We propose a peer identification reward for learning agents in multi-agent games. This reward motivates the agent to learn a context-aware policy for effective exploration and fast adaptation. We evaluate our method on diverse testbeds that involve competitive (Kuhn Poker), cooperative (PO-Overcooked), or mixed (Predator-Prey-W) games with peer agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T13:02:27Z)
• Evading Community Detection via Counterfactual Neighborhood Search [10.990525728657747]
  Community detection is useful for social media platforms to discover tightly connected groups of users who share common interests. Some users may wish to preserve their anonymity and opt out of community detection for various reasons, such as affiliation with political or religious organizations, without leaving the platform. In this study, we address the challenge of community membership hiding, which involves strategically altering the structural properties of a network graph to prevent one or more nodes from being identified by a given community detection algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:30:50Z)
• False Information, Bots and Malicious Campaigns: Demystifying Elements of Social Media Manipulations [6.901078062583646]
  False information and persistent manipulation attacks on online social networks (OSNs) have affected the openness of OSNs. This paper synthesizes insights from various disciplines to provide a comprehensive analysis of the manipulation landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T01:37:33Z)
• Detecting adversaries in Crowdsourcing [71.20185379303479]
  This work investigates the effects of adversaries on crowdsourced classification, under the popular Dawid and Skene model. The adversaries are allowed to deviate arbitrarily from the considered crowdsourcing model, and may potentially cooperate. We develop an approach that leverages the structure of second-order moments of annotator responses, to identify large numbers of adversaries, and mitigate their impact on the crowdsourcing task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T15:07:07Z)
• Understanding Underground Incentivized Review Services [26.402818153734035]
  We study review fraud on e-commerce platforms through an HCI lens. We uncover sophisticated recruitment, execution, and reporting mechanisms fraudsters use to scale their operation. Countermeasures that crack down on communication channels through which these services operate are effective in combating incentivized reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-20T05:30:14Z)
• Surveying Vulnerable Populations: A Case Study of Civil Society Organizations [9.467149414264039]
  We conducted an anonymous online survey with 102 CSO employees to collect information about their perceived risks of different security and privacy threats. We uncovered several issues with our methodology, including the length of the survey, the framing of the questions, and the design of the recruitment email. We hope that the discussion presented in this paper will inform and assist researchers and practitioners working on understanding and improving the security and privacy of CSOs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T05:30:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.