A Grapheme-Aware Indic Tokenizer for Tamil: Large-Scale Training and Intrinsic Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06690v1
• Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:01:26 GMT
• Title: A Grapheme-Aware Indic Tokenizer for Tamil: Large-Scale Training and Intrinsic Evaluation
• Abstract summary: We present a grapheme-aware Indic tokenizer for Tamil that preserves complete grapheme clusters.<n>The tokenizer produces linguistically meaningful token boundaries while remaining fully compatible with transformer-based language models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Tokenization forms the foundation of modern Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems by transforming raw text into discrete units that neural language models can process. The effectiveness of this process directly influences vocabulary efficiency, sequence length, computational cost, and downstream model performance. Although multilingual tokenizers such as Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, and SentencePiece have performed well across numerous languages, they often segment morphologically rich Indic languages inefficiently. Tamil, in particular, poses unique challenges because its grapheme-based writing system can represent a single visible character with multiple Unicode code points. In this work, we present a grapheme-aware Indic tokenizer for Tamil that preserves complete grapheme clusters through a reversible Unicode mapping strategy prior to WordPiece vocabulary learning. By operating on grapheme-level representations instead of individual Unicode code points, the tokenizer produces linguistically meaningful token boundaries while remaining fully compatible with transformer-based language models. The tokenizer is trained on a large-scale Tamil corpus and evaluated using a comprehensive intrinsic evaluation framework that measures compression efficiency, token fragmentation, information density, and vocabulary utilization. Experimental evaluation compares the proposed tokenizer against five widely used multilingual tokenizers: GPT-2, mBERT, mT5, mBART, and NLLB. The proposed tokenizer achieves the strongest performance among the evaluated tokenizers on fragmentation- and sequence-efficiency-oriented intrinsic metrics, while matching the highest observed compression ratio. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of grapheme-aware preprocessing for Tamil tokenization.

Related papers

• What Tokens are Learned when Tokenization is Optimized Jointly with Language Modeling? [1.3177681589844814]
  Tokenization is a fundamental component of language modeling pipelines.<n>In this work, we analyze what tokens are learned when tokenization is jointly optimized with language modeling.<n>We compare tokenizer-free approaches such as SSLMs and H-Nets with fixed tokenizers across 18 typologically and script-diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T03:34:56Z)
• Enhancing Robustness of Autoregressive Language Models against Orthographic Attacks via Pixel-based Approach [51.95266411355865]
  Autoregressive language models are vulnerable to orthographic attacks.<n>This vulnerability stems from the out-of-vocabulary issue inherent in subword tokenizers and their embeddings.<n>We propose a pixel-based generative language model that replaces the text-based embeddings with pixel-based representations by rendering words as individual images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T20:48:38Z)
• Tokens with Meaning: A Hybrid Tokenization Approach for NLP [0.2826977330147589]
  Tokenization plays a pivotal role in natural language processing (NLP)<n>We introduce a hybrid tokenization framework that combines rule-based morphological analysis with statistical subword segmentation.<n>The method uses phono normalization, root-affix, and a novel algorithm that balances morpheme preservation with vocabulary efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T22:17:42Z)
• Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignment [8.097278579432908]
  The choice of tokenizer algorithm is the most significant factor influencing performance, with Unigram-based tokenizers consistently outperforming BPE across most settings.<n>While better morphological alignment shows a moderate, positive correlation with performance on text classification and structure prediction tasks, its impact is secondary to the tokenizer algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T19:23:59Z)
• Sampling from Your Language Model One Byte at a Time [82.71473348639489]
  Tokenization can introduce distortion into the model's generations, known as the Prompt Boundary Problem (PBP)<n>We present an inference-time method to convert any autore LM with a BPE tokenizer into a character-level or byte-level LM.<n>Our method efficiently solves the PBP and is also able to unify the vocabularies of language models with different tokenizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T02:37:04Z)
• Tokenization is Sensitive to Language Variation [14.568179478275255]
  Tokenizers split texts into smaller units and might behave differently for less common linguistic forms.<n>This might affect downstream LLM performance differently on two types of tasks.<n>We find that the best tokenizer varies on the two task types and that the pre-tokenizer has the biggest overall impact on performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T09:58:54Z)
• Signs as Tokens: A Retrieval-Enhanced Multilingual Sign Language Generator [55.94334001112357]
  We introduce a multilingual sign language model, Signs as Tokens (SOKE), which can generate 3D sign avatars autoregressively from text inputs.<n>We propose a retrieval-enhanced SLG approach, which incorporates external sign dictionaries to provide accurate word-level signs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T18:28:09Z)
• Egalitarian Language Representation in Language Models: It All Begins with Tokenizers [0.0]
  We show that not all tokenizers offer fair representation for complex script languages such as Tamil, Sinhala, and Hindi. We introduce an improvement to the Byte Pair algorithm by incorporating graphemes, which we term Grapheme Pair. Our experiments show that grapheme-based character extraction outperforms byte-level tokenizers for complex scripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T19:05:37Z)
• Batching BPE Tokenization Merges [55.2480439325792]
  BatchBPE is an open-source pure Python implementation of the Byte Pair algorithm. It is used to train a high quality tokenizer on a basic laptop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T09:37:21Z)
• MAGNET: Improving the Multilingual Fairness of Language Models with Adaptive Gradient-Based Tokenization [81.83460411131931]
  In multilingual settings, non-Latin scripts and low-resource languages are usually disadvantaged in terms of language models' utility, efficiency, and cost. We propose multilingual adaptive gradient-based tokenization to reduce over-segmentation via adaptive gradient-based subword tokenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T18:59:21Z)
• A Vocabulary-Free Multilingual Neural Tokenizer for End-to-End Task Learning [8.052271364177988]
  Subword tokenization is a commonly used input pre-processing step in most recent NLP models. We propose a vocabulary-free neural tokenizer by distilling segmentation information from subword tokenization. Our tokenizer consistently improves performance on multilingual (NLI) and code-switching (sentiment analysis) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T16:50:49Z)
• BURT: BERT-inspired Universal Representation from Twin Structure [89.82415322763475]
  BURT (BERT inspired Universal Representation from Twin Structure) is capable of generating universal, fixed-size representations for input sequences of any granularity. Our proposed BURT adopts the Siamese network, learning sentence-level representations from natural language inference dataset and word/phrase-level representations from paraphrasing dataset. We evaluate BURT across different granularities of text similarity tasks, including STS tasks, SemEval2013 Task 5(a) and some commonly used word similarity tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T04:01:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.