We Built a Mirror and Mistook It for a Mind: Causal Liability and the Fallacy of AI Consciousness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06715v1
• Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 16:36:14 GMT
• Title: We Built a Mirror and Mistook It for a Mind: Causal Liability and the Fallacy of AI Consciousness
• Abstract summary: We argue that generative systems can return linguistic traces of human interiority in first-person form without thereby identifying a phenomenal bearer.<n>CLT-I proposes liability closure as a criterion for individuating a candidate bearer.<n>CLT-II advances the stronger conjecture that liability closure is necessary and sufficient for minimal phenomenal subjecthood.
• Score: 0.16921396880325779
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The contemporary debate over machine consciousness begins from a concealed assumption: that the object called "AI" already constitutes the kind of entity to which consciousness could belong. This paper challenges that assumption by separating phenomenal consciousness, introspective report, and human projective introspection, then arguing that generative systems can return linguistic traces of human interiority in first-person form without thereby identifying a phenomenal bearer. We call the resulting inference the AI Consciousness Fallacy. We then introduce Causal Liability Theory (CLT). CLT-I proposes liability closure as a criterion for individuating a candidate bearer: a physically continuing process becomes the non-delegable inheritor of constraints generated by its own endogenous discriminations. CLT-II advances the stronger conjecture that liability closure is necessary and sufficient for minimal phenomenal subjecthood. An open-weight causal audit operationalizes CLT-I across multiple model families. Forced discriminations produced persistent downstream divergence; activation patching showed strong causal mediation; live and copied adaptive states were behaviorally identical under matched randomness; and detached reconstruction preserved computational state across process replacement while, by protocol, breaking constitutive continuity and non-delegable inheritance. These results show that CLT-I distinctions are experimentally tractable and can dissociate causal bearer structure from first-person performance. The framework therefore separates consciousness attribution, causal bearer individuation, and the independent metaphysical question of consciousness constitution.

Related papers

• Identity from the Outside: A Conceptual Framework and Research Program for AI Personality Clones [0.0]
  AI "personality clones" force a re-examination of personal identity in operational terms.<n>We distinguish three criteria that "identity" conflates: fidelity to a target person, generic human-likeness, and individuality.<n>We propose a six-term factorization of observed identity with a state-space formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T18:18:21Z)
• Beyond Probabilistic Similarity: Structural, Temporal, and Causal Limitations of Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation has become a standard architectural response to unreliability in legal AI.<n>We argue that these failures are symptoms of an architectural mismatch between probabilistic retrieval and the hierarchical, temporal, and institutional structure of legal knowledge.<n>We develop the argument in three moves. First, we articulate the ontological commitment of legal knowledge as a triad of properties derivable from classical legal theory.<n>Second, we identify three corresponding pathologies of retrieval (mereological blindness, diachronic blindness, and causal opacity), each developed with an operational definition, a failure mechanism, a canonical example, and detection criteria for
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T16:46:53Z)
• Provably Secure Agent Guardrail [89.79561918065122]
  Existing defense architectures rely on empirical semantic guardrails and probabilistic large model adjudicators.<n>This paper proposes a new security paradigm for agents based on the fundamental limitations of logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T02:12:41Z)
• The Accountability Horizon: An Impossibility Theorem for Governing Human-Agent Collectives [0.0]
  Existing accountability frameworks for AI systems, legal, ethical, and regulatory, rest on a shared assumption.<n>This paper proves that agentic AI systems violate this assumption as a mathematical necessity once exceeds a computable threshold.<n>We introduce Human-Agent Collectives, a formalisation of joint human-AI systems where agents are modelled as state-policys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T04:08:26Z)
• Anatomy of a Lie: A Multi-Stage Diagnostic Framework for Tracing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models [62.932580559941414]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) frequently "hallucinate" - generate plausible yet factually incorrect statements.<n>We propose a new paradigm for diagnosing hallucinations, recasting them from static output errors into dynamic pathologies of a model's computational cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T17:20:38Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Managing Ambiguity: A Proof of Concept of Human-AI Symbiotic Sense-making based on Quantum-Inspired Cognitive Mechanism of Rogue Variable Detection [39.146761527401424]
  The study contributes to management theory by reframing ambiguity as a first-class construct.<n>It demonstrates the practical value of human-AI symbiosis for organizational resilience in VUCA environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T11:23:18Z)
• Exploring Syntropic Frameworks in AI Alignment: A Philosophical Investigation [0.0]
  I argue that AI alignment should be reconceived as architecting syntropic, reasons-responsive agents through process-based, multi-agent, developmental mechanisms.<n>I articulate the specification trap'' argument demonstrating why content-based value specification appears structurally unstable.<n>I propose syntropy as an information-theoretic framework for understanding multi-agent alignment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T23:31:29Z)
• Epistemic Trade-Off: An Analysis of the Operational Breakdown and Ontological Limits of "Certainty-Scope" in AI [0.0]
  Recently published "certainty-scope" conjecture offers a compelling insight into the inherent trade-off present within artificial intelligence (AI) systems.<n>This paper argues that the conjecture's objective to furnish insights for engineering design and regulatory decision-making is limited by two fundamental factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T05:47:21Z)
• Generalization or Hallucination? Understanding Out-of-Context Reasoning in Transformers [80.70134000599391]
  We argue that both behaviors stem from a single mechanism known as out-of-context reasoning (OCR)<n>OCR drives both generalization and hallucination, depending on whether the associated concepts are causally related.<n>Our work provides a theoretical foundation for understanding the OCR phenomenon, offering a new lens for analyzing and mitigating undesirable behaviors from knowledge injection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T16:50:45Z)
• A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended Version) [72.77805489645604]
  We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability. Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity. We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z)
• Causal Inference Principles for Reasoning about Commonsense Causality [93.19149325083968]
  Commonsense causality reasoning aims at identifying plausible causes and effects in natural language descriptions that are deemed reasonable by an average person. Existing work usually relies on deep language models wholeheartedly, and is potentially susceptible to confounding co-occurrences. Motivated by classical causal principles, we articulate the central question of CCR and draw parallels between human subjects in observational studies and natural languages. We propose a novel framework, ROCK, to Reason O(A)bout Commonsense K(C)ausality, which utilizes temporal signals as incidental supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T06:12:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.