Promises should be taken seriously: On relativization with promise problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07945v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 19:56:41 GMT
• Title: Promises should be taken seriously: On relativization with promise problems
• Abstract summary: We compare computational models with black-box access to an oracle.<n>For promise problems, black-box access is not canonical due to inputs outside of the promise being unconstrained.<n>We show that results for languages need not transfer to promises.
• Score: 0.25489046505746704
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Relativization is concerned with comparing computational models with black-box access to an oracle. For promise problems, black-box access is not canonical due to inputs outside of the promise being unconstrained. We study two semantics for such access. Under robust queries, a machine must correctly answer regardless of the completion of the problem,, while loose access requires that the internal choices of a machine do not change based on off-promise queries. Our first result separates the language and promise settings. Namely, we construct an oracle $O$ such that $\mathsf{P}^O = \mathsf{BQP}^O = \mathsf{AWPP}^O$, but $\mathsf{PromiseBQP}^O\not\subseteq\mathsf{PromiseP}^O_{\mathsf{/poly}}$. In particular, $\mathsf{BPP}^O = \mathsf{BQP}^O$, but $\mathsf{PromiseBQP}^O \neq \mathsf{PromiseBPP}^O$, showing that results for languages need not transfer to promises. Next, we use loose queries to strengthen the upper bound on the Quantum-Classical Polynomial Hierarchy from $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{PP}^{\mathsf{PP}}}$ to $\mathsf{QCPH} \subseteq \mathsf{BP\cdot PP} \subseteq \mathsf{PromiseBPP}^{\mathsf{PP}}$. The same proof also shows $\mathsf{PP}^\mathsf{PromiseBQP} = \mathsf{PP}$. Additionally, we show that $\mathsf{PromiseBQP}$, even when given quantum advice, is self-low under robust queries. Finally, we exhibit an obstruction to transferring language-level counting results to promise classes. Although $\mathsf{AWPP}$ and $\mathsf{APP}$ are low for $\mathsf{PP}$, a corresponding promise analogue would collapse the counting hierarchy as $\mathsf{GapP} \subseteq \mathsf{FP}^{\mathsf{PromiseAWPP}}$. This motivates the introduction of $\mathsf{PromisePostBQP^*}$, which restricts $\mathsf{PostBQP}$ to input-indepencent postselection. By showing that it is low for \PP, we obtain $\mathsf{PP}^{\mathsf{PromiseYQP^*}} = \mathsf{PP}$.

Related papers

• The optimal betting wealth growth rate [38.54792440099341]
  This paper characterizes the best possible rate of growth of wealth in a Kelly betting game when repeatedly betting against a general i.i.d. null hypothesis $mathscrP$.<n>We show that it equals $lim_n to inftyn-1inf_P in (mathscr P)n)circcirc mathrmKL(Qn,P)$, where $mathscr Pn = Pn: P in mathscrP
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T06:41:12Z)
• A Relativizing MIP for BQP [2.060642030400714]
  We show that the containment $mathsfBQP subseteq mathsfMIP$ holds with respect to any classical oracle.<n>We propose relativization as a proxy for prover efficiency, and hope that progress towards an $mathsfIP$ for $mathsfBQP$ in the oracle world will lead to a non-cryptographic interactive protocol.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T18:45:12Z)
• On the Capacity Region of Individual Key Rates in Vector Linear Secure Aggregation [55.126702858312456]
  We show that it is not necessary for every user to hold a key, thereby strictly enlarging the best-known achievable region in the literature.<n>Our results uncover the novel fact that it is not necessary for every user to hold a key, thereby strictly enlarging the best-known achievable region in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T18:34:07Z)
• Quantum Computation with Correlated Measurements: Implications for the Complexity Landscape [0.2864713389096699]
  We show that $mathsfCorrBQP$ is exactly equal to $mathsfBPPmathsfPP$.<n>We also show that $mathsfCorrBQP$ is self-low with respect to classical queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T16:21:45Z)
• Learning and Computation of $Φ$-Equilibria at the Frontier of Tractability [85.07238533644636]
  $Phi$-equilibria is a powerful and flexible framework at the heart of online learning and game theory.<n>We show that an efficient online algorithm incurs average $Phi$-regret at most $epsilon$ using $textpoly(d, k)/epsilon2$ rounds.<n>We also show nearly matching lower bounds in the online setting, thereby obtaining for the first time a family of deviations that captures the learnability of $Phi$-regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T19:08:26Z)
• Quantum Sabotage Complexity [0.7812210699650152]
  We show $mathsfQ(f_mathsfsab)$, the quantum query complexity of $f_mathsfsab$. We show that when $f$ is the Indexing function, $mathsfQ(f_mathsfsab)=Theta(sqrtmathsfsab)$, ruling out the possibility that $mathsfQ(f_mathsfsab)=Theta(sqrtmathsf
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:57:58Z)
• Cryptographic Hardness of Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise [59.8587499110224]
  We study the complexity of PAC learning halfspaces in the presence of Massart noise. We show that no-time Massart halfspace learners can achieve error better than $Omega(eta)$, even if the optimal 0-1 error is small.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T17:50:53Z)
• Low-degree learning and the metric entropy of polynomials [44.99833362998488]
  We prove that any (deterministic or randomized) algorithm which learns $mathscrF_nd$ with $L$-accuracy $varepsilon$ requires at least $Omega(sqrtvarepsilon)2dlog n leq log mathsfM(mathscrF_n,d,|cdot|_L,varepsilon) satisfies the two-sided estimate $$c (1-varepsilon)2dlog
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T23:52:08Z)
• The Acrobatics of BQP [1.7136832159667206]
  We show that in the black-box setting the behavior of quantum-time ($mathsfBQP$) can be remarkably decoupled from that of classical complexity classes like $mathsfNP$. We also introduce new tools that might be of independent interest. These include a "quantum-aware" version of the random restriction method, a concentration theorem for the block sensitivity of $mathsfAC0$ circuits, and a (provable) analogue of the Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture for sparse oracles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T19:40:05Z)
• Threshold Phenomena in Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise [56.01192577666607]
  We study the problem of PAC learning halfspaces on $mathbbRd$ with Massart noise under Gaussian marginals. Our results qualitatively characterize the complexity of learning halfspaces in the Massart model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T16:16:48Z)
• The Curse of Passive Data Collection in Batch Reinforcement Learning [82.6026077420886]
  In high stake applications, active experimentation may be considered too risky and thus data are often collected passively. While in simple cases, such as in bandits, passive and active data collection are similarly effective, the price of passive sampling can be much higher when collecting data from a system with controlled states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-18T07:54:23Z)
• Linear Bandits on Uniformly Convex Sets [88.3673525964507]
  Linear bandit algorithms yield $tildemathcalO(nsqrtT)$ pseudo-regret bounds on compact convex action sets. Two types of structural assumptions lead to better pseudo-regret bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T07:33:03Z)
• Taking a hint: How to leverage loss predictors in contextual bandits? [63.546913998407405]
  We study learning in contextual bandits with the help of loss predictors. We show that the optimal regret is $mathcalO(minsqrtT, sqrtmathcalETfrac13)$ when $mathcalE$ is known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T07:36:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.