Semi-Supervised Learning under Spatially Biased Sampling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07982v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 21:01:15 GMT
• Title: Semi-Supervised Learning under Spatially Biased Sampling
• Abstract summary: Standard semi-supervised learning (SSL) typically relies on labelled and unlabelled data sharing.<n>We investigate how mismatches degrade SSL, whether the cluster and manifold assumptions survive it, and how the resulting failure can be diagnosed.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Standard semi-supervised learning (SSL) typically relies on labelled and unlabelled data sharing a common marginal distribution. This assumption is often violated by biased spatial sampling mechanism, when labels are collected under spatially biased or preferential site selection. We treat this marginal mismatch, spatial autocorrelation, and spatial non-stationarity as three distinct mechanisms, varied independently via a labelled-sampling concentration parameter, a spatial length scale, and a non-stationarity strength parameter, and ask how mismatch degrades SSL, whether the cluster and manifold assumptions survive it, and how the resulting failure can be diagnosed. Using a controlled synthetic framework alongside PovertyMap-WILDS, California housing, socio-economic and US air quality monitoring datasets, we systematically vary the degree of mismatch while accounting for spatial autocorrelation and non-stationarity. Through a series of analyses including a segmented-regression changepoint, we show that in the synthetic generator, SSL performance does not degrade gradually but instead exhibits a threshold-like breakdown between approximately 0.71 and 0.77 once distribution mismatch becomes sufficiently severe. We further demonstrate that spatial non-stationarity contributes to performance loss independently of marginal mismatch and that models become increasingly overconfident outside the regions where labels are available. To support practical deployment, we evaluate several distribution-divergence measures as indicators of reliability and introduce a kernel-weighted local divergence metric that provides a more stable estimate of spatial mismatch than a naïve localised approach. These findings provide empirical evidence and diagnostic tools for better documenting the risk of incorporating unlabelled spatial data into semi-supervised learning workflows.

Related papers

• Discovery of Hidden Miscalibration Regimes [52.452902154360565]
  Models may be systematically overconfident on some kinds of inputs and underconfident on others.<n>We define the corresponding miscalibration field and propose a diagnostic framework for estimating it.<n>Our approach learns a calibration-aware representation of the input space and estimates signed local miscalibration by kernel smoothing in the learned geometry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T13:07:50Z)
• Local Conformal Calibration of Dynamics Uncertainty from Semantic Images [11.10792616622245]
  We introduce Observation-aware Conformal Uncertainty Local-Calibration (OCULAR)<n>OCULAR is a conformal prediction-based algorithm that uses perception information to provide uncertainty quantification guarantees.<n>We validate our algorithm on a double-integrator system subject to random perturbations and significant model mismatch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T05:33:42Z)
• Spatially Robust Inference with Predicted and Missing at Random Labels [2.5574009994099196]
  We show that cross-fitting induces fold-level correlation that distorts spatial variance estimators, producing unstable or overly conservative confidence intervals.<n>We also propose a jackknife spatial heterosasticity and auto consistent (HAC) variance correction that separates dependence from fold-induced noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T23:14:21Z)
• Calibrated Probabilistic Interpolation for GEDI Biomass [0.0]
  We introduce Attentive Neural Processes (ANPs), a probabilistic meta-learning framework that explicitly conditions predictions on local observation sets.<n>We validate this approach across five distinct biomes ranging from Tropical Amazonian forests to Boreal and Alpine ecosystems.<n>This work provides a scalable, theoretically rigorous alternative to ensemble variance for continental scale earth observation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T15:35:33Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Generative Oversampling Using an Entropy-Guided Conditional Variational Autoencoder [2.1629319643623655]
  We propose a generative oversampling framework that incorporates local uncertainty into both representation learning and data generation.<n>We show that LEO-CVAE consistently improves performance, outperforming both traditional oversampling and generative baselines.<n>These results highlight the value of uncertainty-aware generative oversampling for imbalanced learning in domains governed by complex nonlinear structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T18:00:11Z)
• Calibrating Biased Distribution in VFM-derived Latent Space via Cross-Domain Geometric Consistency [52.52950138164424]
  We show that when leveraging the off-the-shelf (vision) foundation models for feature extraction, the geometric shapes of the resulting feature distributions exhibit remarkable transferability across domains and datasets.<n>We embody our geometric knowledge-guided distribution calibration framework in two popular and challenging settings: federated learning and long-tailed recognition.<n>In long-tailed learning, it utilizes the geometric knowledge transferred from sample-rich categories to recover the true distribution for sample-scarce tail classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T05:22:59Z)
• Spatial Conformal Inference through Localized Quantile Regression [6.992239210938067]
  Conformal prediction offers valid prediction intervals without relying on parametric assumptions.<n>We propose Localized Spatial Conformal Prediction (L SCP), a conformal prediction method designed specifically for spatial data.<n>L SCP achieves accurate coverage with significantly tighter and more consistent prediction intervals compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T04:15:06Z)
• Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis [68.4474531911361]
  We propose a collaborative inverse propensity score estimator for causal inference with heterogeneous data. Our method shows significant improvements over the methods based on meta-analysis when heterogeneity increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T09:04:36Z)
• Decentralized Local Stochastic Extra-Gradient for Variational Inequalities [125.62877849447729]
  We consider distributed variational inequalities (VIs) on domains with the problem data that is heterogeneous (non-IID) and distributed across many devices. We make a very general assumption on the computational network that covers the settings of fully decentralized calculations. We theoretically analyze its convergence rate in the strongly-monotone, monotone, and non-monotone settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T17:45:51Z)
• Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learning [126.31716228319902]
  We develop Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label (DARP) algorithm. We show that DARP is provably and efficiently compatible with state-of-the-art SSL schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T09:16:05Z)
• Heteroskedastic and Imbalanced Deep Learning with Adaptive Regularization [55.278153228758434]
  Real-world datasets are heteroskedastic and imbalanced. Addressing heteroskedasticity and imbalance simultaneously is under-explored. We propose a data-dependent regularization technique for heteroskedastic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T01:09:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.