Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09233v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 20:14:11 GMT
• Title: Subagents vs Agent Skills: Executing Reusable Knowledge for Long-Horizon Agentic Tasks
• Abstract summary: We show that subagent execution outperforms agent-skill execution when skill packages expose clear input-output contracts.<n>Our results show that the benefit of reusable knowledge depends not only on its content, but also on how it is organized and invoked.
• Score: 15.900236740254634
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How can language model agents effectively leverage libraries of reusable knowledge to solve long-horizon tasks? Recent work has increasingly focused on agent skills: reusable capabilities represented as skill packages, i.e., multi-file bundles containing instructions, scripts, and other resources that help agents perform specific tasks. Agent skills are typically executed by loading their skill instructions into an agent's context and relying on the agent to follow them. As task horizons grow, however, this approach becomes increasingly brittle, because reasoning quality degrades as more information accumulates in the context window. We investigate an alternative approach in which skill packages are instead invoked as subagents. Rather than loading skill instructions into the main context, subagent execution spawns fresh context windows dedicated to solving individual subtasks. We show that subagent execution outperforms agent-skill execution when skill packages expose clear input-output contracts and their instructions encode the procedural knowledge needed to fulfill those contracts. The tradeoff is additional communication overhead, as extra tokens are required to coordinate between the main agent and its subagents. Our results show that the benefit of reusable knowledge depends not only on its content, but also on how it is organized and invoked.

Related papers

• Authoring Agent Skills: A Software-Engineering Approach [1.3774017060585184]
  Agent Skills are an emerging way to extend large language model agents with reusable procedural knowledge that the agent loads on demand.<n>Anthropic introduced Agent Skills and published the format as an open specification supported across several agent tools.<n>This note argues that a skill is a software artefact and that its construction should follow software-engineering principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-27T19:43:41Z)
• Anything2Skill: Compiling External Knowledge into Reusable Skills for Agents [27.965275812765015]
  Anything2Skill is a taxonomy-guided framework that compiles heterogeneous external knowledge into reusable, retrievable, and executable skills for agents.<n>We show that Anything2Skill combined with RAG achieves 98.85% and 94.10% success rates, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T10:24:32Z)
• COLLEAGUE.SKILL: Automated AI Skill Generation via Expert Knowledge Distillation [58.84646485020439]
  We present an automated trace-to-skill distillation system for generating person-grounded AI skills.<n> COLLEAGUE.SKILL produces a versioned skill package with two tracks: a capability track for practices, mental models, and decisions, and a bounded behavior track for communication style, interaction rules, and correction history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T12:59:08Z)
• AgentFugue: Agent Scaling for Long-Horizon Tasks through Collective Reasoning [57.72181998599248]
  AgentFugue is a collective reasoning framework built around a shared reasoning hub.<n>As peer agents explore the same task in parallel, the hub records concise notes on what each agent has established, attempted, or ruled out.<n>Our results suggest that collective reasoning can turn scaling out peer agent systems into a distinct source of capability gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-23T09:21:51Z)
• SkillGraph: Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Agents via Evolving Skill Graphs [70.1970574147839]
  We propose SKILLGRAPH, a framework that represents reusable skills as nodes in a directed graph.<n>SKILLGRAPH retrieves not just individual skills, but an ordered skill subgraph that can guide multi-step decision making.<n> Experiments show that SKILLGRAPH achieves state-of-the-art performance against memory-augmented RL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T12:21:49Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Agent Skills: Taxonomy, Techniques, and Applications [18.01291032624805]
  Large language model (LLM)-based agents that reason, plan, and act through tools, memory, and structured interaction are emerging as a promising paradigm for automating complex tasks.<n>Yet as agents move toward open-ended, real-world deployment, relying on from-scratch reasoning and low-level tool calls for every task become increasingly inefficient, error-prone, and hard to maintain.<n>This survey examines this challenge through the lens of emphagent skills, which we define as reusable procedural artifacts that coordinate tools, memory, and runtime context under task-specific constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T07:10:26Z)
• AgentSearchBench: A Benchmark for AI Agent Search in the Wild [21.739444037726418]
  We introduce AgentSearchBench, a large-scale benchmark for agent search in the wild.<n>The benchmark formalizes agent search as retrieval and reranking problems under both executable task queries and high-level task descriptions.<n>We show that lightweight behavioral signals, including execution-aware probing, can substantially improve ranking quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T10:53:54Z)
• SoK: Agentic Skills -- Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents [6.356997609995175]
  Agentic systems increasingly rely on reusable procedural capabilities, textita.k.a., agentic skills, to execute long-horizon reliably.<n>This paper maps the skill layer across the full lifecycle (discovery, practice, distillation, storage, composition, evaluation, and update)<n>We analyze the security and governance implications of skill-based agents, covering supply-chain risks, prompt injection via skill payloads, and trust-tiered execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T13:11:38Z)
• SkillJect: Automating Stealthy Skill-Based Prompt Injection for Coding Agents with Trace-Driven Closed-Loop Refinement [120.52289344734415]
  We propose an automated framework for stealthy prompt injection tailored to agent skills.<n>The framework forms a closed loop with three agents: an Attack Agent that synthesizes injection skills under explicit stealth constraints, a Code Agent that executes tasks using the injected skills and an Evaluate Agent that logs action traces.<n>Our method consistently achieves high attack success rates under realistic settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T16:09:48Z)
• AgentIF-OneDay: A Task-level Instruction-Following Benchmark for General AI Agents in Daily Scenarios [49.90735676070039]
  The capacity of AI agents to effectively handle tasks of increasing duration and complexity continues to grow.<n>We argue that current evaluations prioritize increasing task difficulty without sufficiently addressing the diversity of agentic tasks.<n>We propose AgentIF-OneDay, aimed at determining whether general users can utilize natural language instructions and AI agents to complete a diverse array of daily tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T13:49:18Z)
• Explaining Reinforcement Learning Policies through Counterfactual Trajectories [147.7246109100945]
  A human developer must validate that an RL agent will perform well at test-time. Our method conveys how the agent performs under distribution shifts by showing the agent's behavior across a wider trajectory distribution. In a user study, we demonstrate that our method enables users to score better than baseline methods on one of two agent validation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T00:52:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.