Settling: Equilibrium Inference for Non-Convex Validity Sets
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09682v1
- Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 03:57:24 GMT
- Title: Settling: Equilibrium Inference for Non-Convex Validity Sets
- Abstract summary: Under squared loss, an ambiguous conditional distribution can have a single point estimate that is invalid.<n>We formalize this failure as conditional mean collapse and introduce Settling, an equilibrium-based operator that separates proposal generation, consistency evaluation, and test-time selection.
- Score: 0.45687771576879593
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Many learning systems return a single point estimate even when admissible outputs form disconnected or non-convex sets. Under squared loss, an ambiguous conditional distribution can therefore have a Bayes-optimal conditional mean that is invalid. We formalize this failure as conditional mean collapse and introduce Settling, an equilibrium-based inference operator that separates proposal generation, consistency evaluation, and test-time equilibrium selection. The operator treats a mean-seeking proposal as an initialization and refines it toward a locally stable configuration; conditional on initialization, refinement is deterministic. We establish exact-gradient descent, local convergence, and an inexact-gradient robustness condition relevant to learned consistency critics. In a reproducible 100-context geometric diagnostic, the mean-seeking baseline succeeds in 0/100 contexts, stochastic denoising in 100/100, and Settling in 99/100 while producing substantially lower trajectory roughness. A 1,200-run sensitivity study yields 97-100% success across obstacle-jitter ranges up to 0.20 and 94-100% across one-time initialization perturbations from 0.05 to 0.50. Cross-domain panels remain mechanism illustrations; learned high-dimensional validation remains an open empirical test.
Related papers
- Semiparametric Inference for Conditional Shapley Feature Importance [0.0]
This paper studies the conditional formulation, in which out-of-coalition features are integrated out under their true conditional distribution.<n>We propose a one-step estimator with K-fold cross-fitting and a U-statistic correction of the squared loss interval.<n>A Pinsker-type bound quantifies the bias from misspecifying the working copula class, while vine copulas keep conditional sampling tractable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-09T15:19:24Z) - A proximal subgradient method for nonconvex stochastic optimization under the Kurdyka-Ćojasiewicz condition [39.146761527401424]
This work introduces a proximal subgradient method for minimizing the sum of an expected cost.<n>We use the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz (KL) property to guarantee convergence of the whole trajectory to a single stationary point.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T23:07:27Z) - Cross-Fitted Residual Utility for Primary-Preserving Cognitive Decision Correction in Automatic Modulation Classification [1.547549252134621]
We study a post-inference problem through cross-fitted residual utility and a primary-preserving cognitive decision policy.<n>A structured KAN-Fourier classifier supplies the default probability, while neural and non-neural candidates provide observable evidence.<n>On RMLA, RMLB, and HISAR, the complete system improves overall accuracy from 63.632% to 66.332%, 65.161% to 66.168%, and 77.769% to 79.867%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T11:07:37Z) - Adaptive Stabilizer State Fidelity Certification [3.2669518901121672]
We develop an adaptive extension that reports the full certified fidelity interval.<n>We prove monotonic tightening, exact recovery once all nontrivial stabilizers are covered, and the worst-case necessity of full coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T12:02:58Z) - ConformaDecompose: Explaining Uncertainty via Calibration Localization [0.26385121748044166]
Conformal Prediction provides distribution-free prediction intervals with guaranteed coverage.<n>Its reliance on a single global calibration threshold obscures the sources of uncertainty at the instance level.<n>We introduce an uncertainty-aware explainability framework that analyses the reducibility of calibration-induced uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-29T19:58:15Z) - Conformal Robust Set Estimation [41.99844472131922]
We propose a robust conformal method based on a non-conformity score defined as the half-mass radius around a point.<n>We show that the resulting conformal regions are marginally valid for any sample size and converge in probability to a robust population central set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-20T15:59:23Z) - Learning from Emptiness: De-biasing Listwise Rerankers with Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration [76.08899010904652]
CapCal is a training-free framework that mechanically decouples positional bias from ranking decisions.<n>It achieves superior performance among training-free methods while preserving single-pass efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-11T10:47:22Z) - Geometric Calibration and Neutral Zones for Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Class Classification [0.0]
This work bridges information geometry and statistical learning, offering formal guarantees for uncertainty-aware classification in applications requiring rigorous validation.<n> Empirical validation on Adeno-Associated Virus classification demonstrates that the two-stage framework captures 72.5% of errors while deferring 34.5% of samples, reducing automated decision error rates from 16.8% to 6.9%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T01:29:49Z) - Target Networks and Over-parameterization Stabilize Off-policy Bootstrapping with Function Approximation [46.48569176651487]
We prove a weaker convergence condition for bootstrapped value estimation in certain cases, even with off-policy data.<n>We extend our results to learning with truncated trajectories, showing that convergence is achievable for all tasks with minor modifications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T17:36:16Z) - Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable
Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model.
By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation.
It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z) - Decoding probabilistic syndrome measurement and the role of entropy [0.0]
We study the performance of the toric code under a model of probabilistic stabiliser measurement.
We find that, even under a completely continuous model of syndrome extraction, the threshold can be maintained at reasonably high values of $1.69%$ by suitably modifying the decoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T20:12:48Z) - Near-Optimal Non-Parametric Sequential Tests and Confidence Sequences
with Possibly Dependent Observations [44.71254888821376]
We provide the first type-I-error and expected-rejection-time guarantees under general non-data generating processes.
We show how to apply our results to inference on parameters defined by estimating equations, such as average treatment effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-29T18:37:08Z) - Fully Stochastic Trust-Region Sequential Quadratic Programming for
Equality-Constrained Optimization Problems [62.83783246648714]
We propose a sequential quadratic programming algorithm (TR-StoSQP) to solve nonlinear optimization problems with objectives and deterministic equality constraints.
The algorithm adaptively selects the trust-region radius and, compared to the existing line-search StoSQP schemes, allows us to utilize indefinite Hessian matrices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T05:52:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.