Sound Debloating of Redundant Checks in Zero-Knowledge Machine-Learning Circuits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10149v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 13:27:25 GMT
• Title: Sound Debloating of Redundant Checks in Zero-Knowledge Machine-Learning Circuits
• Abstract summary: We present an automated framework that removes redundant checks while provably preserving soundness.<n>Our tool removes up to 48.7% of constraints and reduces prover time by up to 72.8%, without weakening security.
• Score: 8.87115326771099
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Zero-knowledge (ZK) proof systems for neural-network inference compile the model into a system of arithmetic constraints. Many of these constraints are redundant checks: range proofs, sign lookups, and bit decompositions who are globally entailed by the rest of the circuit through chains of reasoning that span distant gadgets. Removing them shrinks the circuit and accelerates proving, but the removal must be carefully justified: an unsoundly debloated circuit becomes forgeable, accepting witnesses the original would have rejected and so allowing a prover to claim, for example, that a neural network produced an output it never actually computed. Such soundness vulnerabilities are not hypothetical: under-constrained circuits in deployed ZK systems have enabled attackers to forge transactions and bypass verification entirely. We present an automated framework that removes redundant checks while provably preserving soundness. For each candidate removal, our tool first checks whether the rest of the circuit, on its own, can still rule out every value the removed check was excluding. Using whole-circuit abstract interpretation, the analysis searches for such alternative justifications and records them in a provenance graph; a check is then removed only when an alternative path through the graph still derives the facts that it is checking. This ensures that the debloated circuit opens no new forging strategy to an adversary. We evaluate circuits spanning MLP, CNN, RNN, and transformer architectures generated by two production frameworks (ezkl and zkml), with up to 25.3 million constraints. Our tool removes up to 48.7\% of constraints and reduces prover time by up to 72.8\%, without weakening security.

Related papers

• Formal Verification of Quantum Ancilla Safety [3.5368690233168114]
  We propose an end-to-end verification-and-repair framework for clean and dirty ancilla safety.<n>We first prove that verifying an $m$-qubit dirty ancilla register decomposes into $2m$ independent clean ancilla safety checks.<n>We then reduce each clean ancilla safety instance to an algebraic commutativity check against Pauli-$Z$ and Pauli-$X$ operators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T11:20:06Z)
• Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces [9.39195684989942]
  Autoregressive multimodal large language models (MLLMs) suffer from error snowballing.<n>In state-of-the-art open-source MLLMs, once the first error occurs, the reasoning cascades into failure across all remaining steps in 65% of such cases.<n>We propose Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces (CART), a neuro-symbolic framework that trains MLLMs to interleave natural language reasoning steps with symbolic constraint assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T09:24:45Z)
• Demystifying Variance in Circuit Discovery of LLMs [51.97489679448601]
  We develop a new circuit discovery method that substantially lessens resampling variance.<n>We show that rephrasing variance arises because prompts with different templates tend to activate different circuits in the model.<n>We argue that sparsity, which has been claimed to form more compact and interpretable task circuits, fails to solve this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T16:25:07Z)
• Certified Circuits: Stability Guarantees for Mechanistic Circuits [80.30622018787835]
  Certified Circuits provides provable stability guarantees for circuit discovery.<n>On ImageNet and OOD datasets, certified circuits achieve up to 91% higher accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T13:07:31Z)
• zkCraft: Prompt-Guided LLM as a Zero-Shot Mutation Pattern Oracle for TCCT-Powered ZK Fuzzing [7.274627641804014]
  zkCraft is a framework that combines deterministic, R1CS-aware localization with proof-bearing search to detect semantic inconsistencies.<n>We show that proof-bearing localization detects diverse under- and over-constrained faults with low false positives and reduces costly solver interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T11:31:00Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable yet Noisy Rewards under Imperfect Verifiers [90.50039419576807]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) trains policies against automated verifiers to avoid costly human labeling.<n>To reduce vulnerability to verifier hacking, many RLVR systems collapse rewards to binary $0,1$ during training.<n>This choice carries a cost: it introduces textitfalse negatives (rejecting correct answers, FNs) and textitfalse positives (accepting incorrect ones, FPs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T13:56:44Z)
• Bisimulation Learning [55.859538562698496]
  We compute finite bisimulations of state transition systems with large, possibly infinite state space. Our technique yields faster verification results than alternative state-of-the-art tools in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T17:11:27Z)
• AC4: Algebraic Computation Checker for Circuit Constraints in ZKPs [4.810904298160317]
  Underconstrained or overconstrained circuits may lead to bugs. A tool, AC4, is proposed to represent the implementation of the method. Within a solvable range, the checking time has also exhibited noticeable improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T01:44:57Z)
• The #DNN-Verification Problem: Counting Unsafe Inputs for Deep Neural Networks [94.63547069706459]
  #DNN-Verification problem involves counting the number of input configurations of a DNN that result in a violation of a safety property. We propose a novel approach that returns the exact count of violations. We present experimental results on a set of safety-critical benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T18:32:01Z)
• Quantum Error Mitigation by Pauli Check Sandwiching [4.419800664096479]
  We describe and analyze an error mitigation technique that uses multiple pairs of parity checks to detect the presence of errors. We build on the results on extended flag gadgets and put it on a firm theoretical foundation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T03:48:50Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Entropy Regularization [78.16196949641079]
  In structured prediction, the goal is to jointly predict many output variables that together encode a structured object. One approach -- entropy regularization -- posits that decision boundaries should lie in low-probability regions. We propose a loss, neuro-symbolic entropy regularization, that encourages the model to confidently predict a valid object.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T06:23:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.