Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04183v1
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:09:28 GMT
• Title: Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal Definition
• Authors: Abhinav Java, Ashmit Khandelwal, Sukruta Midigeshi, Aaron Halfaker, Amit Deshpande, Navin Goyal, Ankur Gupta, Nagarajan Natarajan, Amit Sharma,
• Abstract summary: We propose a formal characterization of the deep research (DR) task and introduce a benchmark to evaluate the performance of DR systems.<n>We argue that the core defining feature of deep research is not the production of lengthy report-style outputs, but rather the high fan-out over concepts required during the search process.
• Score: 24.523394260858822
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Information tasks such as writing surveys or analytical reports require complex search and reasoning, and have recently been grouped under the umbrella of \textit{deep research} -- a term also adopted by recent models targeting these capabilities. Despite growing interest, the scope of the deep research task remains underdefined and its distinction from other reasoning-intensive problems is poorly understood. In this paper, we propose a formal characterization of the deep research (DR) task and introduce a benchmark to evaluate the performance of DR systems. We argue that the core defining feature of deep research is not the production of lengthy report-style outputs, but rather the high fan-out over concepts required during the search process, i.e., broad and reasoning-intensive exploration. To enable objective evaluation, we define DR using an intermediate output representation that encodes key claims uncovered during search-separating the reasoning challenge from surface-level report generation. Based on this formulation, we propose a diverse, challenging benchmark LiveDRBench with 100 challenging tasks over scientific topics (e.g., datasets, materials discovery, prior art search) and public interest events (e.g., flight incidents, movie awards). Across state-of-the-art DR systems, F1 score ranges between 0.02 and 0.72 for any sub-category. OpenAI's model performs the best with an overall F1 score of 0.55. Analysis of reasoning traces reveals the distribution over the number of referenced sources, branching, and backtracking events executed by current DR systems, motivating future directions for improving their search mechanisms and grounding capabilities. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/microsoft/LiveDRBench.

Related papers

• Deep Researcher with Test-Time Diffusion [32.375428487905104]
  Test-Time Diffusion Deep Researcher conceptualizes research report generation as a diffusion process.<n>Draft-centric design makes the report writing process more timely and coherent.<n>We demonstrate that our TTD-DR achieves state-of-the-art results on a wide array of benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T21:23:21Z)
• Towards Agentic RAG with Deep Reasoning: A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in LLMs [69.10441885629787]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) lifts the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by injecting external knowledge.<n>It falls short on problems that demand multi-step inference; conversely, purely reasoning-oriented approaches often hallucinate or mis-ground facts.<n>This survey synthesizes both strands under a unified reasoning-retrieval perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T03:29:41Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
  We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z)
• DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents [30.768405850755602]
  DeepResearch Bench is a benchmark consisting of 100 PhD-level research tasks.<n> evaluating Deep Research Agents is inherently complex and labor-intensive.<n>We propose two novel methodologies that achieve strong alignment with human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:17:32Z)
• Causal Retrieval with Semantic Consideration [6.967392207053045]
  We propose CAWAI, a retrieval model that is trained with dual objectives: semantic and causal relations.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that CAWAI outperforms various models on diverse causal retrieval tasks.<n>We also show that CAWAI exhibits strong zero-shot generalization across scientific domain QA tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:04:31Z)
• A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Models: Language, Multimodality, and Beyond [88.5807076505261]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance gains by scaling up the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning during inference.<n>A growing concern lies in their tendency to produce excessively long reasoning traces.<n>This inefficiency introduces significant challenges for training, inference, and real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:36:30Z)
• Beyond the Destination: A Novel Benchmark for Exploration-Aware Embodied Question Answering [87.76784654371312]
  Embodied Question Answering requires agents to dynamically explore 3D environments, actively gather visual information, and perform multi-step reasoning to answer questions.<n>Existing datasets often introduce biases or prior knowledge, leading to disembodied reasoning.<n>We construct the largest dataset designed specifically to evaluate both exploration and reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T06:29:47Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Reward-guided Tree Search [95.06503095273395]
  o1-like reasoning approach is challenging, and researchers have been making various attempts to advance this open area of research.<n>We present a preliminary exploration into enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs through reward-guided tree search algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T16:15:17Z)
• Robust Neural Information Retrieval: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective [111.58315434849047]
  robustness of neural information retrieval models (IR) models has garnered significant attention. We view the robustness of IR to be a multifaceted concept, emphasizing its necessity against adversarial attacks, out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios and performance variance. We provide an in-depth discussion of existing methods, datasets, and evaluation metrics, shedding light on challenges and future directions in the era of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T16:07:01Z)
• ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answering [70.6359636116848]
  We propose a new large-scale dataset, ConvFinQA, to study the chain of numerical reasoning in conversational question answering. Our dataset poses great challenge in modeling long-range, complex numerical reasoning paths in real-world conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T23:48:50Z)
• Deep Depth Completion: A Survey [26.09557446012222]
  We provide a comprehensive literature review that helps readers better grasp the research trends and clearly understand the current advances. We investigate the related studies from the design aspects of network architectures, loss functions, benchmark datasets, and learning strategies. We present a quantitative comparison of model performance on two widely used benchmark datasets, including an indoor and an outdoor dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-11T08:24:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.