VikingRAG: Accurate and Token-efficient Retrieval-augmented Generation over Structured Documents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11390v1
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 11:25:59 GMT
- Title: VikingRAG: Accurate and Token-efficient Retrieval-augmented Generation over Structured Documents
- Abstract summary: State-of-the-art retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods exploit document structures to acquire sufficient evidence, but often incur substantial token costs.<n>We present sf VikingRAG, a directory-aware semantic data management system that tightly integrates semantic and structural access.<n>With retrieval-trace reuse and adaptive escalation, token costs drop to 5.1%--32.5% while maintaining competitive accuracy and practical document-storage performance.
- Score: 16.5373268346586
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: State-of-the-art retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods exploit document structures to acquire sufficient evidence, but often incur substantial token costs. To reduce structural-context tokens without compromising high RAG accuracy, we present {\sf VikingRAG}, a directory-aware semantic data management system that tightly integrates semantic and structural access to support structural-context-efficient, evidence-gap-driven multi-round retrieval. To further reduce token overhead of multi-round interaction, we materialize agentic multi-round retrieval traces as experience edges, and reuse these edges for similar queries, avoiding repeated multi-round exploration. To additionally reduce token costs when agentic multi-round retrieval is unnecessary, we introduce an adaptive escalation strategy that answers from one-round experience-augmented retrieval when the evidence is sufficient, and invokes agentic multi-round retrieval only otherwise. Experiments on real datasets show that the base system {\sf VikingRAG} matches high accuracy of state-of-the-art methods while consuming only 11.6\%--51.9\% of their tokens. With retrieval-trace reuse and adaptive escalation, token costs drop to 5.1\%--32.5\% while maintaining competitive accuracy and practical document-storage performance, showing the utility of this work for emerging AI knowledge bases.
Related papers
- Hierarchical Evidence-Driven Reasoning for Long Document Understanding [95.51688464037096]
We introduce HIEVI-RAG, a hierarchical, evidence-driven multimodal RAG framework for closed-domain document understanding.<n>Our framework significantly outperforms existing open-source baselines and exceeds the strongest reported baseline by an average of 8.05% in accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-06T03:08:28Z) - HiKEY: Hierarchical Multimodal Retrieval for Open-Domain Document Question Answering [19.052998569565627]
HiKEY is a hierarchical tree-based multimodal retrieval framework that elevates document hierarchy to a first-class retrieval signal.<n> Experiments on ODQA benchmarks demonstrate that HiKEY significantly outperforms page- and chunk-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T08:42:21Z) - NaviRAG: Towards Active Knowledge Navigation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [50.16741209529908]
NaviRAG is a novel framework that shifts from passive segment retrieval to active knowledge navigation.<n>We show that NaviRAG consistently improves both retrieval recall and end-to-end answer performance over conventional RAG baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T14:07:01Z) - LITTA: Late-Interaction and Test-Time Alignment for Visually-Grounded Multimodal Retrieval [0.0]
LITTA is a query-expansion-centric retrieval framework for evidence page retrieval.<n>Given a user query, LITTA generates complementary query variants using a large language model.<n>Candidates from expanded queries are aggregated through reciprocal rank fusion to improve evidence coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T13:25:39Z) - Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z) - CREAM: Continual Retrieval on Dynamic Streaming Corpora with Adaptive Soft Memory [19.64051996386645]
CREAM is a self-supervised framework for memory-based continual retrieval.<n>It adapts to both seen and unseen topics in an unsupervised setting.<n> Experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that CREAM exhibits superior adaptability and retrieval accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T04:47:49Z) - Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z) - Hierarchical Retrieval: The Geometry and a Pretrain-Finetune Recipe [42.35197658021889]
Dual encoder (DE) models, where a pair of matching query and document are embedded into similar vector representations, are widely used in information retrieval.<n>This paper investigates such limitations in the context of hierarchical retrieval (HR), where the document set has a hierarchical structure and the matching documents for a query are all of its ancestors.<n>We introduce a pretrain-finetune recipe that significantly improves long-distance retrieval without sacrificing performance on closer documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-19T20:35:58Z) - Learning Refined Document Representations for Dense Retrieval via Deliberate Thinking [58.69615583599489]
Deliberate Thinking based Retriever (Debater) is a novel approach that enhances document representations by incorporating a step-by-step thinking process.<n>Debater significantly outperforms existing methods across several retrieval benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:56:34Z) - Is Semantic Chunking Worth the Computational Cost? [0.0]
This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of semantic chunking using three common retrieval-related tasks.
The results show that the computational costs associated with semantic chunking are not justified by consistent performance gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T21:53:48Z) - Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation [36.04062963574603]
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) relies heavily on relevance of retrieved documents, raising concerns about how the model behaves if retrieval goes wrong.
We propose the Corrective Retrieval Augmented Generation (CRAG) to improve the robustness of generation.
CRAG is plug-and-play and can be seamlessly coupled with various RAG-based approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T04:36:39Z) - Autoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document
Identifiers [53.0729058170278]
Autoregressive language models are emerging as the de-facto standard for generating answers.
Previous work has explored ways to partition the search space into hierarchical structures.
In this work we propose an alternative that doesn't force any structure in the search space: using all ngrams in a passage as its possible identifiers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T10:45:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.