Target leakage, not model class, explains reported accuracy in survey-based cardiovascular screening: a leakage-tiered audit of glass-box and tabular foundation models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11838v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:29:15 GMT
• Title: Target leakage, not model class, explains reported accuracy in survey-based cardiovascular screening: a leakage-tiered audit of glass-box and tabular foundation models
• Abstract summary: Screening models routinely report areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) near 0.89.<n>We benchmarked ten classifiers spanning linear, tree-ensemble, neural, glass-box, and tabular foundation classes for prevalent myocardial infarction.<n>Removing two post-diagnostic features cost every model 0.049-0.051 AUROC, collapsing the field into a 0.0045-wide band.<n>One threshold detected 75.4% of women's infarctions against 89.0% of men's; editing the model's shape functions reduced the gap to 0.010.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cardiovascular screening models trained on national health surveys routinely report areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) near 0.89. We asked whether that accuracy reflects learning or target leakage, whether tabular foundation models change the answer, and whether the properties deployment requires survive joint examination. We benchmarked ten classifiers spanning linear, tree-ensemble, neural, glass-box, and tabular foundation classes for prevalent myocardial infarction in 442,067 respondents of the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System across five feature tiers of decreasing leakage risk. Each was audited for discrimination, calibration, fairness at an explicit screening threshold, conformal coverage, explanation faithfulness, and inference cost, then applied -- models and thresholds frozen -- to 430,755 respondents of 2023. Removing two post-diagnostic features cost every model 0.049-0.051 AUROC, collapsing the field into a 0.0045-wide band. The glass-box explainable boosting machine was non-inferior to every alternative within a pre-specified 0.005 margin while scoring the cohort roughly 104 times faster than the strongest foundation model. One threshold detected 75.4% of women's infarctions against 89.0% of men's; editing the model's shape functions reduced the gap to 0.010. Marginal conformal prediction gave 0.86 coverage to men and 0.82 to adults over 60; Mondrian calibration repaired every stratum. Frozen models transported within 0.002 AUROC. Reported headroom in this literature is a property of the feature set, not the learner. Transparency cost nothing measurable and made fairness repair and uncertainty conditioning directly auditable. Evaluation practice, not model capacity, is the binding constraint.

Related papers

• The Model Proposes, the Code Disposes: A Pre-Registered Ablation of a Verifier-and-Acceptance Stage in an LLM-Orchestrated Offensive-Security Agent [0.0]
  We evaluate whether a verifier-and-acceptance stage - a model verifier whose verdicts are enforced by deterministic code - changes what an LLM-driven offensive-security agent reports.<n>We report a 15-run exploratory pilot, a pre-registered 20-run confirmatory ablation, and a pre-registered 2 x 2 factorial study with 40 runs across two deliberately vulnerable lab targets.<n>The results support a narrow conclusion: the verifier changes what the system ships, while deterministic code supplies enforcement and auditability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-14T17:13:05Z)
• CARDEA: Auditable Reasoning Grounded in Spatial Evidence for End-to-End Coronary Angiography Interpretation [0.0]
  Existing AI systems can improve consistency but lack auditable decision processes.<n>We developed CARDEA, a unified large vision-language model that serves as the inference core of a CAG pipeline.<n> CARDEA runs an end-to-end CAG pipeline from raw multiview videos through selection to study-level diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-07T02:01:27Z)
• A Domain-Structured Ensemble Framework for Perioperative Outcome Prediction Using Electronic Health Record Data [0.0]
  Perioperative risk prediction models are often limited by narrow surgical populations, incomplete data, and limited interpretability.<n>We present a domain-structured ensemble framework for outcome prediction using routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data.<n>We demonstrate the framework using postoperative delirium in a case-control sample of 5,386 surgical encounters from a statewide health information exchange.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-09T21:15:12Z)
• Cross-Fitted Residual Utility for Primary-Preserving Cognitive Decision Correction in Automatic Modulation Classification [1.547549252134621]
  We study a post-inference problem through cross-fitted residual utility and a primary-preserving cognitive decision policy.<n>A structured KAN-Fourier classifier supplies the default probability, while neural and non-neural candidates provide observable evidence.<n>On RMLA, RMLB, and HISAR, the complete system improves overall accuracy from 63.632% to 66.332%, 65.161% to 66.168%, and 77.769% to 79.867%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T11:07:37Z)
• A Few Neurons Reveal When LLMs Misuse Tools: Sparse Detection and Selective Steering for Reliable Tool Use [28.57781785937644]
  We introduce PRISMS (Probing Representations In Support of Monitoring and Steering), a closed-loop framework that shares a failure-specific neuron basis between sparse detection and activation.<n>Across six models, PRISMS reduces pooled over-calling rate by 80% while increasing tool-required accuracy by 14.2 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T19:03:44Z)
• LLM Doesn't Know What It Doesn't Know: Detecting Epistemic Blind Spots via Cross-Model Attribution Divergence on Clinical Tabular Data [2.1443570696048906]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to structured clinical data.<n>We compare Qwen 2.5 7B and XGBoost on a prediction task via attribution divergence analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T18:49:44Z)
• Calibration, Uncertainty Communication, and Deployment Readiness in CKD Risk Prediction: A Framework Evaluation Study [0.0]
  Machine learning models for chronic kidney disease often post strong discrimination scores on internal test sets.<n>We trained five classifiers on the UCI CKD dataset (400 patients, 62.5% CKD prevalence)<n>We evaluated each across calibration quality, conformal prediction coverage, and an eight-criterion deployment readiness framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T17:12:48Z)
• A Multi-Domain Red Teaming Framework for Safety, Robustness, and Fairness Evaluation of Medical Large Language Models [34.38896321208398]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across healthcare, yet existing benchmarks fail to capture model behavior under adversarial or ethically complex conditions.<n>We developed a multi-domain red teaming framework evaluating eleven contemporary LLMs across 690 clinically grounded scenarios.<n>Results revealed substantial performance variance, with mean scores ranging from 0.791 to 0.984.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T14:57:55Z)
• From Black Box to Glass Box: Cross-Model ASR Disagreement to Prioto Review in Ambient AI Scribe Documentation [43.148402136307716]
  Cross-model disagreement among heterogeneous ASR systems can act as a reference-free uncertainty signal.<n>We transcribed 50 publicly available medical audio clips with eight ASR systems spanning commercial APIs and open-source engines.<n>Low-agreement regions were enriched for content disagreements, with the content fraction increasing from 53.9% to 73.9% across quintiles of high-risk mass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T13:02:13Z)
• Mitigating LLM Hallucination via Behaviorally Calibrated Reinforcement Learning [32.32593439144886]
  Behavior-calibrated reinforcement learning allows smaller models to surpass frontier models in uncertainty quantification.<n>Our model's log-scale Accuracy-to-Hallucination Ratio gain (0.806) exceeds GPT-5's (0.207) in a challenging in-domain evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T22:51:48Z)
• Transparent Early ICU Mortality Prediction with Clinical Transformer and Per-Case Modality Attribution [42.85462513661566]
  We present a lightweight, transparent multimodal ensemble that fuses physiological time-series measurements with unstructured clinical notes from the first 48 hours of an ICU stay.<n>A logistic regression model combines predictions from two modality-specific models: a bidirectional LSTM for vitals and a finetuned ClinicalModernBERT transformer for notes.<n>On the MIMIC-III benchmark, our late-fusion ensemble improves discrimination over the best single model while maintaining well-calibrated predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T20:11:49Z)
• Automatic Cough Analysis for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Detection [33.37223681850477]
  Early detection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for improving patient outcomes.<n>We explore the use of automatic cough analysis as a pre-screening tool for distinguishing between NSCLC patients and healthy controls.<n>Recordings were analyzed using machine learning techniques, such as support vector machine (SVM) and XGBoost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T11:30:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.