Artificial Id: Drive and Persistent Alignment in Agentic AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11911v1
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:56:41 GMT
- Title: Artificial Id: Drive and Persistent Alignment in Agentic AI
- Abstract summary: Agentic AI is moving from bounded task execution to systems that retain consequential state, continue operating and adapt across task boundaries.<n>We propose an artificial id, an adaptive internal drive for determining whether behavior should continue, stop or change.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Agentic AI is moving from bounded task execution toward systems that retain consequential state, continue operating and adapt across task boundaries. That shift creates a control problem that current harnesses largely solve by hand: objectives, retries, verification, stopping rules and other behavioral transitions are specified externally. We propose an artificial id, an adaptive internal drive for determining whether behavior should continue, stop or change. In a minimal virtual Petri-dish experiment, a controller too small to perform general-purpose reasoning and receiving no task-specific behavioral objective develops useful control through differential persistence. The same mechanism selects an unintended physical strategy when that behavior persists better and later replaces a learned sensor mapping when its environmental meaning changes. These results show that adaptive direction can emerge without being explicitly specified as a behavioral objective. The same persistence that makes such adaptive agency useful can also allow misalignment, corrupted state and unintended behavior to persist across task boundaries. A scalable artificial id would carry consequential state and adaptive drive across those boundaries, making alignment a property of the continuing agentic system rather than of a model response or single trajectory. Such systems require a persistent alignment boundary over trusted observations, consequence channels, persistent state, authority, identity, provenance and hard constraints.
Related papers
- ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step [74.83535434786145]
We introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning.<n>The benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction.<n>Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T15:07:46Z) - End-to-end Conditional Diffusion for Realistic and Controllable Visual Traffic Scenario Generation [59.188006170485046]
E2E-CDiff is an end-to-end conditional diffusion framework for controllable and realistic scenario generation.<n>Differentiable guidance regulates speed, enforces drivable-area compliance, and supports collision-avoidance or collision-seeking behaviors.<n>E2E-CDiff also performs competitively as a learning-based ego planner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-21T02:13:25Z) - DeSeG: Decoupling Semantic Intent and Geometric Constraints for Physically Plausible Human-Scene Interaction [50.06148080975928]
We propose DeSeG, a hierarchical framework that explicitly decouples semantic intent from geometric constraints.<n>DeSeG achieves state-of-the-art performance, reducing mean scene penetration by 47% and improving semantic alignment by 29% over the SOTA baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T03:21:08Z) - When Regulation Has Memory: Hysteresis and Control Burden in Artificial Agency [0.0]
Two systems may reach similar internal states while one requires much more corrective control to get there.<n>Using a computational model of adaptive uncertainty regulation, we study whether that burden depends on history.<n>Results suggest that adaptive agents should be evaluated not only by whether they remain organized, but by how much regulation they must recruit to do so.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-29T23:19:26Z) - Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems [0.0]
This paper explores the architectural vulnerability of unbounded autonomy.<n>We instantiate this theory via the SMARt model, a four-layer framework featuring Stable, Meta-cognitive, Assisted, and Regulated states.<n>We conclude that formalizing failure management within the autonomy lifecycle is a crucial step toward realizing reliable and governed artificial intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T19:49:23Z) - Prediction and Empowerment: A Theory of Agency through Bridge Interfaces [0.10152838128195464]
We study agency under partial observability in deterministic physical or simulated worlds.<n>We prove a separation between prediction, compression, and empowerment.<n>For modern AI agents, the results suggest a design principle rather than a theorem of inevitability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T14:30:46Z) - When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use Agents [90.05202259420138]
Unintended computer-use agents can deviate from expected outcomes even under benign input contexts.<n>We introduce the first conceptual and methodological framework for unintended CUA behaviors.<n>We propose AutoElicit: an agentic framework that iteratively perturbs benign instructions using CUA execution feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T03:20:11Z) - \ extsc{NaVIDA}: Vision-Language Navigation with Inverse Dynamics Augmentation [50.027425808733994]
textscNaVIDA is a unified VLN framework that couples policy learning with action-grounded visual dynamics and adaptive execution.<n>textscNaVIDA augments training with chunk-based inverse-dynamics supervision to learn causal relationship between visual changes and corresponding actions.<n>Experiments show that textscNaVIDA achieves superior navigation performance compared to state-of-the-art methods with fewer parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-26T06:16:17Z) - Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents [58.00130492861884]
TraitBasis is a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents.<n>TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits.<n>We observe on average a 2%-30% performance degradation on $tau$-Trait across frontier models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T05:03:57Z) - Control-ITRA: Controlling the Behavior of a Driving Model [14.31198056147624]
We introduce a method called Control-ITRA to influence agent behavior through waypoint assignment and target speed modulation.<n>We demonstrate that our method can generate controllable, infraction-free trajectories while preserving realism in both seen and unseen locations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-17T03:35:11Z) - DARTH: Holistic Test-time Adaptation for Multiple Object Tracking [87.72019733473562]
Multiple object tracking (MOT) is a fundamental component of perception systems for autonomous driving.
Despite the urge of safety in driving systems, no solution to the MOT adaptation problem to domain shift in test-time conditions has ever been proposed.
We introduce DARTH, a holistic test-time adaptation framework for MOT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T10:10:42Z) - BehAVExplor: Behavior Diversity Guided Testing for Autonomous Driving
Systems [27.223488110349567]
Testing autonomous driving systems (ADSs) is a critical task for ensuring their reliability and safety.
Existing methods mainly focus on searching for safety violations while the diversity of the generated test cases is ignored.
We present a novel behavior-guided fuzzing technique (BehAVExplor) to explore the different behaviors of the ego vehicle and detect diverse violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T17:24:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.