From Network Inequality to Network Fairness: A Perspective on Responsible Decision-Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13867v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 10:38:52 GMT
• Title: From Network Inequality to Network Fairness: A Perspective on Responsible Decision-Making
• Abstract summary: Social networks shape how individuals make decisions and how opportunities are distributed.<n>We identify ten network effects and trace how they create structural biases in the relationship between what we intend to measure and what we observe.<n>Using academic hiring as an example, we show that network biases are not inherently harmful or beneficial.
• Score: 8.949281514037148
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Social networks shape how individuals make decisions and how opportunities are distributed. However, the mechanisms that generate these networks often reflect pre-existing inequalities, and technologies that rely on network-derived signals risk further amplifying such disparities. Algorithmic fairness research largely treats networks as a fixed background, grounding analysis almost exclusively in distributive justice and overlooking how network structures systematically bias decision-making. In this Perspective, we identify ten network effects and trace how they create structural biases in the relationship between what we intend to measure and what we observe. Using academic hiring as an example, we show that network biases are not inherently harmful or beneficial. Determining their legitimacy requires examining the entire decision-making process through the lenses of both distributive and procedural justice while engaging all affected stakeholders. We therefore call for a holistic, networked approach to fairness that moves beyond static group categories and recognizes the dynamic, relational, and structural nature of inequality.

Related papers

• Fairness-Aware Network Embeddings: Methods, Applications, and Challenges [16.601913689265547]
  Real-world networks often reflect structural inequalities from demographic imbalances, homophily, and other societal biases.<n>This survey presents a comprehensive overview of fairness-aware network embeddings for complex networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-19T18:51:55Z)
• Fairness in Opinion Dynamics [0.7340017786387767]
  We study how a state-of-the-art model discriminates certain minority groups and whether it is possible to reliably predict for whom it will perform worse.<n>Our work explores how three classifier models (Demography-Based, Topology-Based, and Hybrid) perform when assessing for whom this algorithm will provide inaccurate predictions.<n>We conclude that a multi-faceted approach, incorporating both individual attributes and network structures, is essential for reducing algorithmic bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T12:15:02Z)
• The Power of Network Pluralism: Multi-Perspective Modeling of Heterogeneous Legal Document Networks [5.170807667319542]
  This paper introduces Network Pluralism as a conceptual framework that leverages multi-perspectivity to yield more complete, meaningful, and robust results.<n>We develop and demonstrate the benefits of this approach via a hands-on analysis of complex legal systems.<n>Our work acts as a blueprint to facilitate the broader adoption of Network Pluralism in domain-driven network research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T12:47:43Z)
• Coding schemes in neural networks learning classification tasks [52.22978725954347]
  We investigate fully-connected, wide neural networks learning classification tasks. We show that the networks acquire strong, data-dependent features. Surprisingly, the nature of the internal representations depends crucially on the neuronal nonlinearity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T14:50:05Z)
• Recommendation Fairness in Social Networks Over Time [20.27386486425493]
  We study the evolution of recommendation fairness over time and its relation to dynamic network properties. Our results suggest that recommendation fairness improves over time, regardless of the recommendation method. Two network properties, minority ratio, and homophily ratio, exhibit stable correlations with fairness over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T19:03:23Z)
• Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognition [107.58227666024791]
  Face recognition systems are widely deployed in safety-critical applications, including law enforcement. They exhibit bias across a range of socio-demographic dimensions, such as gender and race. Previous works on bias mitigation largely focused on pre-processing the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T15:46:05Z)
• Stimulative Training of Residual Networks: A Social Psychology Perspective of Loafing [86.69698062642055]
  Residual networks have shown great success and become indispensable in today's deep models. We aim to re-investigate the training process of residual networks from a novel social psychology perspective of loafing. We propose a new training strategy to strengthen the performance of residual networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-09T03:15:51Z)
• FairSNA: Algorithmic Fairness in Social Network Analysis [17.39106091928567]
  We highlight how the structural bias of social networks impacts the fairness of different methods. We discuss fairness aspects that should be considered while proposing network structure-based solutions for different SNA problems. We highlight various open research directions that require researchers' attention to bridge the gap between fairness and SNA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T19:11:38Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Rank Diminishing in Deep Neural Networks [71.03777954670323]
  Rank of neural networks measures information flowing across layers. It is an instance of a key structural condition that applies across broad domains of machine learning. For neural networks, however, the intrinsic mechanism that yields low-rank structures remains vague and unclear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T12:03:32Z)
• Joint Learning of Neural Transfer and Architecture Adaptation for Image Recognition [77.95361323613147]
  Current state-of-the-art visual recognition systems rely on pretraining a neural network on a large-scale dataset and finetuning the network weights on a smaller dataset. In this work, we prove that dynamically adapting network architectures tailored for each domain task along with weight finetuning benefits in both efficiency and effectiveness. Our method can be easily generalized to an unsupervised paradigm by replacing supernet training with self-supervised learning in the source domain tasks and performing linear evaluation in the downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T08:15:17Z)
• Provably Training Neural Network Classifiers under Fairness Constraints [70.64045590577318]
  We show that overparametrized neural networks could meet the constraints. Key ingredient of building a fair neural network classifier is establishing no-regret analysis for neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T18:46:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.