Rethinking the Implications of Human Feedback for Preference Learning in Human-Robot Collaboration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13982v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:54:54 GMT
• Title: Rethinking the Implications of Human Feedback for Preference Learning in Human-Robot Collaboration
• Abstract summary: In Human-Robot Interaction, the standard approach to learn a reward model that represents human preferences for robot behavior consists of three steps.<n>First, the robot collects limited direct evidence from human feedback (e.g., positive or negative binary feedback)<n>Second, the robot utilizes the direct evidence to infer accepted or rejected labels feasible but unchosen actions using fixed implication rules.<n>Third, the robot updates the reward model with both the direct and derived evidence.
• Score: 2.8952292379640636
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In Human-Robot Interaction, the standard approach to learn a reward model that represents human preferences for robot behavior consists of three steps. First, the robot collects limited direct evidence from human feedback (e.g., positive or negative binary feedback). Then, the robot utilizes the direct evidence to derive accepted or rejected labels to feasible but unchosen actions using fixed implication rules. Finally, the robot updates the reward model with both the direct and derived evidence. Unfortunately, the fixed rule can hinder preference learning: in a user study with two collaborative simulation environments, human-provided implication labels often differed from the standard fixed rule, and using the human labels substantially improved reward learning with the Preference Learning from Implicit and Explicit Feedback (PIE) algorithm. Consequently, we propose IMPLIED, an implication modeling method that treats fixed-rule implications as an initial guide while learning to infer and revise accepted and rejected action labels over time. Across evaluations on recorded human-robot interaction trajectories and a physical robot pizza-making study, IMPLIED predicts human implications more accurately than the fixed rule approach and LLM baselines, approaching the performance of a human-label oracle. In turn, IMPLIED reduces preference-estimation error and leads to robot actions that are more often rational with respect to a combined reward (which includes the true preference reward and a task-specific reward) compared to baselines. By learning to reason about the implications of human feedback, this work enables more faithful and efficient robot behavior adaptation during human-robot collaboration.

Related papers

• Robot Self-Improvement via Human-Video Dynamics Models [52.14862052988773]
  We show that human videos can be used to learn embodiment-agnostic action, dynamics, and value representations that transfer across robot embodiments.<n>We introduce Dynamics-Guided Action Correction (DGAC), a training-free approach that leverages these adapted models to repair failed states.<n>Results show that human priors and robot failures can be combined to enable scalable autonomous policy improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T13:17:27Z)
• Designing for Difference: How Human Characteristics Shape Perceptions of Collaborative Robots [8.095309110037315]
  Antisocial robot behavior was consistently rated as the lowest, while collaboration with aged individuals elicited more sensitive evaluations.<n>These findings suggest that both human characteristics and interaction paradigms influence the perceived acceptability of collaborative robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T11:36:08Z)
• Human-Robot Mutual Learning through Affective-Linguistic Interaction and Differential Outcomes Training [Pre-Print] [0.3811184252495269]
  We test how affective-linguistic communication, in combination with differential outcomes training, affects mutual learning in a human-robot context. Taking inspiration from child- caregiver dynamics, our human-robot interaction setup consists of a (simulated) robot attempting to learn how best to communicate internal, homeostatically-controlled needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T13:35:08Z)
• Real-time Addressee Estimation: Deployment of a Deep-Learning Model on the iCub Robot [52.277579221741746]
  Addressee Estimation is a skill essential for social robots to interact smoothly with humans. Inspired by human perceptual skills, a deep-learning model for Addressee Estimation is designed, trained, and deployed on an iCub robot. The study presents the procedure of such implementation and the performance of the model deployed in real-time human-robot interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T13:01:21Z)
• What Matters to You? Towards Visual Representation Alignment for Robot Learning [81.30964736676103]
  When operating in service of people, robots need to optimize rewards aligned with end-user preferences. We propose Representation-Aligned Preference-based Learning (RAPL), a method for solving the visual representation alignment problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T23:04:07Z)
• ImitationNet: Unsupervised Human-to-Robot Motion Retargeting via Shared Latent Space [9.806227900768926]
  This paper introduces a novel deep-learning approach for human-to-robot motion. Our method does not require paired human-to-robot data, which facilitates its translation to new robots. Our model outperforms existing works regarding human-to-robot similarity in terms of efficiency and precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T08:55:04Z)
• Self-Improving Robots: End-to-End Autonomous Visuomotor Reinforcement Learning [54.636562516974884]
  In imitation and reinforcement learning, the cost of human supervision limits the amount of data that robots can be trained on. In this work, we propose MEDAL++, a novel design for self-improving robotic systems. The robot autonomously practices the task by learning to both do and undo the task, simultaneously inferring the reward function from the demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T18:51:38Z)
• "No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomy [70.45420918526926]
  We present LILAC, a framework for incorporating and adapting to natural language corrections online during execution. Instead of discrete turn-taking between a human and robot, LILAC splits agency between the human and robot. We show that our corrections-aware approach obtains higher task completion rates, and is subjectively preferred by users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-06T15:03:27Z)
• Learning Latent Representations to Co-Adapt to Humans [12.71953776723672]
  Non-stationary humans are challenging for robot learners. In this paper we introduce an algorithmic formalism that enables robots to co-adapt alongside dynamic humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T16:19:24Z)
• Continuous ErrP detections during multimodal human-robot interaction [2.5199066832791535]
  We implement a multimodal human-robot interaction (HRI) scenario, in which a simulated robot communicates with its human partner through speech and gestures. The human partner, in turn, evaluates whether the robot's verbal announcement (intention) matches the action (pointing gesture) chosen by the robot. In intrinsic evaluations of robot actions by humans, evident in the EEG, were recorded in real time, continuously segmented online and classified asynchronously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T15:39:32Z)
• Show Me What You Can Do: Capability Calibration on Reachable Workspace for Human-Robot Collaboration [83.4081612443128]
  We show that a short calibration using REMP can effectively bridge the gap between what a non-expert user thinks a robot can reach and the ground-truth. We show that this calibration procedure not only results in better user perception, but also promotes more efficient human-robot collaborations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-06T09:14:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.