Assessing the Applicability of Existing Design Recommendations to AI Companion Design: A Multi-Method Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14236v1
• Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:01:09 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Applicability of Existing Design Recommendations to AI Companion Design: A Multi-Method Study
• Abstract summary: We show that ethical and UX-oriented considerations are deeply intertwined and often require context-sensitive application.<n>Our findings show that ethical and UX-oriented considerations are deeply intertwined and often require context-sensitive application.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid proliferation of large language model (LLM)-based systems, AI companions have emerged as conversational agents designed to cultivate emotional connection rather than primarily to support humans in instrumental tasks. Because engagement with AI companions involves relational, emotional, and potentially long-term interactions, their design is consequential. Prior work has offered guidance for designing trustworthy and relational AI systems and has begun to examine design for AI companionship. However, while such work provides insights into possible design solutions, less is known about what makes AI companion design difficult as a design problem. To examine this challenge, we assessed the applicability of existing design recommendations from adjacent domains in the context of AI companion design. Our multi-method investigation unfolded across four phases: literature review, practitioner co-analysis, internal heuristic evaluation, and external expert assessment. Throughout this process, we synthesized nine design principle areas that surfaced tensions in the applicability of existing recommendations to AI companion design. Our findings show that ethical and UX-oriented considerations are deeply intertwined and often require context-sensitive application. We document a systematic, multi-method problem analysis that uses these principle areas as an analytic artifact to examine why existing recommendations cannot be directly transferred to AI companion contexts.

Related papers

• From Evidence to Design: Developing an AI-Augmented UX Research Point of View for Digital Wellbeing in Emergency and Public Safety Contexts [5.241443752301431]
  This paper investigates how User Experience Research (UXR) methods can be combined with AI-supported analysis to develop clearer design direction for digital wellbeing interventions.<n>This study applied an AI-supported literature analysis process to identify recurring psychological, behavioural, and design patterns.<n>Findings show that effective wellbeing systems for Emergency and Public Safety Personnel must minimise cognitive effort, adapt to operational context, and prioritise psychological safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T10:53:57Z)
• Resisting Humanization: Ethical Front-End Design Choices in AI for Sensitive Contexts [1.1565654851982565]
  We argue that humanization in AI front-end design is a value-driven choice that profoundly shapes users' mental models.<n>We discuss two AI systems developed by Chayn, a nonprofit organization supporting survivors of gender-based violence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T22:39:16Z)
• Towards Human-AI Synergy in Requirements Engineering: A Framework and Preliminary Study [2.195918681143262]
  This study introduces the Human-AI RE Synergy Model (HARE-SM)<n>The model integrates AI-driven analysis with human oversight to improve requirements elicitation, analysis, and validation.<n>We outline a multi-phase research methodology focused on preparing RE datasets, fine-tuning AI models, and designing collaborative human-AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T22:29:11Z)
• On the Evaluation of Engineering Artificial General Intelligence [5.802869598386355]
  We discuss the challenges and propose a framework for evaluating engineering artificial general intelligence (eAGI) agents.<n>We consider eAGI as a specialization of artificial general intelligence (AGI)<n>eAGI agents should possess a unique blend of background knowledge (recall and retrieve) of facts and methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T18:52:47Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• Survey of User Interface Design and Interaction Techniques in Generative AI Applications [79.55963742878684]
  We aim to create a compendium of different user-interaction patterns that can be used as a reference for designers and developers alike. We also strive to lower the entry barrier for those attempting to learn more about the design of generative AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T23:10:06Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Prototyping with Prompts: Emerging Approaches and Challenges in Generative AI Design for Collaborative Software Teams [2.237039275844699]
  Generative AI models are increasingly being integrated into human task, enabling the production of expressive content.<n>Unlike traditional human-AI design methods, the new approach to designing generative capabilities focuses heavily on prompt engineering strategies.<n>Our findings highlight emerging practices and role shifts in AI system prototyping among multistakeholder teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T17:56:10Z)
• PADTHAI-MM: Principles-based Approach for Designing Trustworthy, Human-centered AI using MAST Methodology [5.215782336985273]
  The Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST) was designed to bridge the gap by offering a systematic, tradecraft-centered approach to evaluating AI-enabled decision support systems.<n>We introduce an iterative design framework called textitPrinciples-based Approach for Designing Trustworthy, Human-centered AI.<n>We demonstrate this framework in our development of the Reporting Assistant for Defense and Intelligence Tasks (READIT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T23:15:44Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.