Bridging the Gap in ECG-Based Emotion Recognition: A Unified Evaluation of Deep Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15055v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:21:31 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Gap in ECG-Based Emotion Recognition: A Unified Evaluation of Deep Learning Models
• Abstract summary: This study presents a comparative analysis of prominent deep learning architectures in Automated Emotion Recognition (AER)<n>We consolidate three publicly available AER datasets, CUADS, ASCERTAIN, and DREAMER, into a single dataset, increasing variability in sensor types, recording conditions, and participant demographics.<n>Our findings provide insights into the trade-offs between classification accuracy and model complexity, establishing a reproducible benchmark for AER research.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning has led to numerous proposed architectures for Automated Emotion Recognition (AER) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data, but inconsistencies in preprocessing, training, and evaluation make direct comparisons difficult. Most studies train and validate models on individual datasets collected under homogeneous conditions, limiting variability and raising concerns about generalizability. Cross-dataset validation is sometimes used but primarily assesses model adaptability rather than true generalization. This study presents a comparative analysis of prominent deep learning architectures in AER, emphasizing model generalization over dataset adaptability. To enable this benchmark, we introduce two open-source frameworks: Affective Research on Representations and Classifications (ARRC), a standardized benchmarking toolkit, and Affective Research Dataset Toolkit (ARDT), a framework for inter-dataset training and validation. Using ARDT, we consolidate three publicly available AER datasets, CUADS, ASCERTAIN, and DREAMER, into a single dataset, increasing variability in sensor types, recording conditions, and participant demographics. We then use ARRC to evaluate three widely studied deep learning models and two CNN baselines through hyperparameter optimization and 10-fold cross-validation. Our findings provide insights into the trade-offs between classification accuracy and model complexity, establishing a reproducible benchmark for AER research. All source code for ARRC, ARDT, and model evaluation is publicly available to ensure transparency and facilitate further research.

Related papers

• AlignDiff: Exploiting Model-Intrinsic Information for Better Preference Data Selection [53.61691036434302]
  We propose AlignDiff, a preference data filtering framework driven by intrinsic model signals.<n>AlpacaEval 2.0, Arena-Hard, and MT-Bench benchmarks are evaluated.<n>We conduct comprehensive ablation studies to validate the effectiveness of AlignDiff.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T05:51:23Z)
• OpenDataArena: A Fair and Open Arena for Benchmarking Post-Training Dataset Value [74.80873109856563]
  OpenDataArena (ODA) is a holistic and open platform designed to benchmark the intrinsic value of post-training data.<n>ODA establishes a comprehensive ecosystem comprising four key pillars: (i) a unified training-evaluation pipeline that ensures fair, open comparisons across diverse models; (ii) a multi-dimensional scoring framework that profiles data quality along tens of distinct axes; and (iii) an interactive data lineage explorer to visualize dataset genealogy and dissect component sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T03:33:24Z)
• Deepfake Detection that Generalizes Across Benchmarks [48.85953407706351]
  The generalization of deepfake detectors to unseen manipulation techniques remains a challenge for practical deployment.<n>This work demonstrates that robust generalization is achievable through a parameter-efficient adaptation of one of the foundational pre-trained vision encoders.<n>The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming more complex, recent approaches in average cross-dataset AUROC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T12:03:56Z)
• Query-Based Adaptive Aggregation for Multi-Dataset Joint Training Toward Universal Visual Place Recognition [10.8843105310375]
  Query-based Adaptive Aggregation (QAA) is a novel feature aggregation technique that leverages learned queries as reference codebooks.<n>We show that QAA outperforms state-of-the-art models, achieving balanced generalization across diverse datasets while maintaining peak performance comparable to dataset-specific models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T22:40:03Z)
• The role of data partitioning on the performance of EEG-based deep learning models in supervised cross-subject analysis: a preliminary study [37.69303106863453]
  Deep learning is advancing the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) data by effectively discovering highly nonlinear patterns.<n>No comprehensive guidelines for proper data partitioning and cross-validation exist in the domain.<n>This paper thoroughly investigates the role of data partitioning and cross-validation in evaluating EEG deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T12:05:28Z)
• Benchmarking community drug response prediction models: datasets, models, tools, and metrics for cross-dataset generalization analysis [36.689210473887904]
  We introduce a benchmarking framework for evaluating cross-dataset prediction generalization in deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models.<n>We quantify both absolute performance (e.g., predictive accuracy across datasets) and relative performance (e.g., performance drop compared to within-dataset results)<n>Our results reveal substantial performance drops when models are tested on unseen datasets, underscoring the importance of rigorous generalization assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T15:40:18Z)
• Consistency Regularization for Generalizable Source-free Domain Adaptation [62.654883736925456]
  Source-free domain adaptation (SFDA) aims to adapt a well-trained source model to an unlabelled target domain without accessing the source dataset. Existing SFDA methods ONLY assess their adapted models on the target training set, neglecting the data from unseen but identically distributed testing sets. We propose a consistency regularization framework to develop a more generalizable SFDA method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T07:45:53Z)
• Universal Domain Adaptation from Foundation Models: A Baseline Study [58.51162198585434]
  We make empirical studies of state-of-the-art UniDA methods using foundation models. We introduce textitCLIP distillation, a parameter-free method specifically designed to distill target knowledge from CLIP models. Although simple, our method outperforms previous approaches in most benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T16:28:29Z)
• HyperImpute: Generalized Iterative Imputation with Automatic Model Selection [77.86861638371926]
  We propose a generalized iterative imputation framework for adaptively and automatically configuring column-wise models. We provide a concrete implementation with out-of-the-box learners, simulators, and interfaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T19:10:35Z)
• BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models [41.45240621979654]
  We introduce BEIR, a heterogeneous benchmark for information retrieval. We study the effectiveness of nine state-of-the-art retrieval models in a zero-shot evaluation setup. Dense-retrieval models are computationally more efficient but often underperform other approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T23:29:55Z)
• Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Study [92.40991050806544]
  We investigate three schemes to improve the model generalization ability for few-shot settings. We perform empirical comparisons on 10 public NER datasets with various proportions of labeled data. We create new state-of-the-art results on both few-shot and training-free settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T23:43:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.