The Magnitude Mirage: Rethinking Confidence for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15578v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:49:24 GMT
• Title: The Magnitude Mirage: Rethinking Confidence for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval
• Abstract summary: Many production RAG systems implement retrieval abstention by thresholding raw similarity scores, implicitly treating score magnitude as a confidence signal.<n>We demonstrate that this practice degrades systematically as queries require reasoning beyond semantic matching.<n>To address this without computationally expensive alternatives, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of six zero-cost Query Performance Prediction (QPP) metrics across three cognitive tiers.
• Score: 22.82938587928396
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many production RAG systems implement retrieval abstention by thresholding raw similarity scores, implicitly treating score magnitude as a confidence signal. We demonstrate that this practice degrades systematically as queries require reasoning beyond semantic matching. Across 11 retrieval architectures and 28 datasets, neural retrievers consistently assign high similarity scores to semantically related but constraint-violating documents, causing magnitude-based thresholds to collapse toward near-random abstention performance on logical and temporal reasoning tasks---a failure we term the Magnitude Mirage. To address this without computationally expensive alternatives, we conduct a large-scale empirical study of six zero-cost Query Performance Prediction (QPP) metrics across three cognitive tiers: semantic matching (BEIR), logical reasoning (BRIGHT), and temporal reasoning (TEMPO). Our central finding is that the key improvement comes from abandoning magnitude in favor of score-distribution signals: the gain from this shift exceeds the differences among distributional alternatives by a factor of 5-10$\times$. In particular, Score Gap ($s_1 - s_k$) and a practical adaptation of Score Magnitude and Variance (LSMV) improve abstention AUROC by up to 0.16 in settings where magnitude-based confidence provides little discriminative power. These methods require no additional inference, retraining, or latency, making them a practical zero-cost replacement for magnitude thresholding in deployed RAG systems.

Related papers

• Beyond Aggregate Calibration: Decomposing Income-Conditional Recall Disparities in Automated Credit Default Prediction [0.0]
  High-income defaulters are disproportionately classified as label noise relative to low-income defaulters.<n>A 16.86 percentage point gap in true positive rate (recall) between high- and low-income borrowers who ultimately defaulted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T15:57:15Z)
• Relative Score Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language Models [29.344961499429257]
  Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer a promising route to parallel and efficient text generation.<n>The lack of tractable sequence-level log-ratios forces existing methods to rely on high-variance ELBO-based approximations.<n>We propose textbfRelative textbfScore textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (RSPO) to calibrate noisy likelihood estimates in dLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T08:58:40Z)
• Architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header and its application to resolve semantically proximal classification errors with vision transformers [0.0]
  This work presents an architecture-agnostic Lipschitz-constant Bayesian header that can be integrated into feature extractors such as vision transformers.<n>We also propose a novel metric to capture uncertainty and confidence across misclassification rates, as well as an adaptive arithmetic-mean fusion scheme.<n>Although computational costs increase due to Monte Carlo sampling, the method offers plug-and-play compatibility with pre-trained backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T09:18:06Z)
• Beyond Semantic Relevance: Counterfactual Risk Minimization for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generation [19.888565537472363]
  CoRM-RAG (Counterfactual Risk Minimization for RAG) is a framework that aligns retrieval with decision safety rather than mere similarity.<n>We introduce a Cognitive Perturbation Protocol to simulate user biases during training, which is then distilled into a lightweight Evidence Critic.<n>This scoring module learns to identify documents that possess sufficient evidential strength to steer the model toward correctness despite adversarial query perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-02T07:22:24Z)
• Too Correct to Learn: Reinforcement Learning on Saturated Reasoning Data [55.84428098924793]
  We propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration.<n>We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance.<n> Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T16:43:28Z)
• ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
  ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z)
• Thinking by Subtraction: Confidence-Driven Contrastive Decoding for LLM Reasoning [58.331709210563616]
  Thinking by Subtraction is a confidence-driven contrastive decoding approach.<n>A small subset of low-confidence tokens disproportionately contributes to reasoning errors and unnecessary output expansion.<n>Our method, Confidence-Driven Contrastive Decoding, detects low-confidence tokens during decoding and intervenes at these positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T14:13:22Z)
• Towards Anytime-Valid Statistical Watermarking [63.02116925616554]
  We develop the first e-value-based watermarking framework, Anchored E-Watermarking, that unifies optimal sampling with anytime-valid inference.<n>Our framework can significantly enhance sample efficiency, reducing the average token budget required for detection by 13-15% relative to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:32:26Z)
• RaCoT: Plug-and-Play Contrastive Example Generation Mechanism for Enhanced LLM Reasoning Reliability [12.67288560758937]
  We propose RaCoT (Retrieval-aware Contrastive-of-Thought), a novel framework that shifts contrastive thinking to the pre-retrieval stage.<n>RaCoT guides the model to proactively focus on the critical details that determine answer divergence"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-26T15:06:44Z)
• TrustJudge: Inconsistencies of LLM-as-a-Judge and How to Alleviate Them [58.04324690859212]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-judge) has revealed critical inconsistencies in current evaluation frameworks.<n>We identify two fundamental types of inconsistencies: Score-Comparison Inconsistency and Pairwise Transitivity Inconsistency.<n>We propose TrustJudge, a probabilistic framework that addresses these limitations through two key innovations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T13:04:29Z)
• Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
  Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs.<n>We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint.<n>We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z)
• Efficient and Sharp Off-Policy Evaluation in Robust Markov Decision Processes [44.974100402600165]
  We study the evaluation of a policy best-parametric and worst-case perturbations to a decision process (MDP) We use transition observations from the original MDP, whether they are generated under the same or a different policy. Our estimator is also estimated statistical inference using Wald confidence intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T18:11:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.