Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07592v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 19:58:01 GMT
• Title: Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustness
• Authors: Mazda Moayeri, Kiarash Banihashem, Soheil Feizi
• Abstract summary: In practice, models need to enjoy both types of robustness to ensure reliability. In this work, we show that in fact, explicit tradeoffs exist between adversarial and natural distributional robustness.
• Score: 48.44639585732391
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Several existing works study either adversarial or natural distributional robustness of deep neural networks separately. In practice, however, models need to enjoy both types of robustness to ensure reliability. In this work, we bridge this gap and show that in fact, explicit tradeoffs exist between adversarial and natural distributional robustness. We first consider a simple linear regression setting on Gaussian data with disjoint sets of core and spurious features. In this setting, through theoretical and empirical analysis, we show that (i) adversarial training with $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ norms increases the model reliance on spurious features; (ii) For $\ell_\infty$ adversarial training, spurious reliance only occurs when the scale of the spurious features is larger than that of the core features; (iii) adversarial training can have an unintended consequence in reducing distributional robustness, specifically when spurious correlations are changed in the new test domain. Next, we present extensive empirical evidence, using a test suite of twenty adversarially trained models evaluated on five benchmark datasets (ObjectNet, RIVAL10, Salient ImageNet-1M, ImageNet-9, Waterbirds), that adversarially trained classifiers rely on backgrounds more than their standardly trained counterparts, validating our theoretical results. We also show that spurious correlations in training data (when preserved in the test domain) can improve adversarial robustness, revealing that previous claims that adversarial vulnerability is rooted in spurious correlations are incomplete.

Related papers

• Adversarial Training Can Provably Improve Robustness: Theoretical Analysis of Feature Learning Process Under Structured Data [38.44734564565478]
  We provide a theoretical understanding of adversarial examples and adversarial training algorithms from the perspective of feature learning theory. We show that the adversarial training method can provably strengthen the robust feature learning and suppress the non-robust feature learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T03:59:49Z)
• Benchmarking Zero-Shot Robustness of Multimodal Foundation Models: A Pilot Study [61.65123150513683]
  multimodal foundation models, such as CLIP, produce state-of-the-art zero-shot results. It is reported that these models close the robustness gap by matching the performance of supervised models trained on ImageNet. We show that CLIP leads to a significant robustness drop compared to supervised ImageNet models on our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T17:33:49Z)
• The Surprising Harmfulness of Benign Overfitting for Adversarial Robustness [13.120373493503772]
  We prove a surprising result that even if the ground truth itself is robust to adversarial examples, the benignly overfitted model is benign in terms of the standard'' out-of-sample risk objective. Our finding provides theoretical insights into the puzzling phenomenon observed in practice, where the true target function (e.g., human) is robust against adverasrial attack, while beginly overfitted neural networks lead to models that are not robust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T15:40:46Z)
• TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
  This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks. We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework. TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z)
• Understanding the Logit Distributions of Adversarially-Trained Deep Neural Networks [6.439477789066243]
  Adversarial defenses train deep neural networks to be invariant to the input perturbations from adversarial attacks. Although adversarial training is successful at mitigating adversarial attacks, the behavioral differences between adversarially-trained (AT) models and standard models are still poorly understood. We identify three logit characteristics essential to learning adversarial robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T19:09:15Z)
• Adversarial Robustness under Long-Tailed Distribution [93.50792075460336]
  Adversarial robustness has attracted extensive studies recently by revealing the vulnerability and intrinsic characteristics of deep networks. In this work we investigate the adversarial vulnerability as well as defense under long-tailed distributions. We propose a clean yet effective framework, RoBal, which consists of two dedicated modules, a scale-invariant and data re-balancing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T17:53:08Z)
• Non-Singular Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks [58.731070632586594]
  Adrial robustness has become an emerging challenge for neural network owing to its over-sensitivity to small input perturbations. We formalize the notion of non-singular adversarial robustness for neural networks through the lens of joint perturbations to data inputs as well as model weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T20:59:30Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial Robustness and Optimization Bias [28.56135898767349]
  Adrial robustness is an open challenge in deep learning, most often tackled using adversarial training. We show that it is possible to achieve both perfect standard accuracy and a certain degree of robustness without a trade-off. In particular, we characterize the robustness of linear convolutional models, showing that they resist attacks subject to a constraint on the Fourier-$ell_infty$ norm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T16:58:04Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Adversarial Robustness of Supervised Sparse Coding [34.94566482399662]
  We consider a model that involves learning a representation while at the same time giving a precise generalization bound and a robustness certificate. We focus on the hypothesis class obtained by combining a sparsity-promoting encoder coupled with a linear encoder. We provide a robustness certificate for end-to-end classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T22:05:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.