Bridging the Gap Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Asynchronous Optimization Is Surprisingly Difficult

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17483v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 17:24:09 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Gap Between Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Asynchronous Optimization Is Surprisingly Difficult
• Abstract summary: We show that improvement is provably impossible under widely used first- and second-order similarity assumptions for any randomized algorithm.<n>We derive a new time complexity bound that matches the dependence on worker computation times in the best-known result in the homogeneous setting.
• Score: 67.12978375116599
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern large-scale machine learning tasks often require multiple workers, devices, CPUs, or GPUs to compute stochastic gradients in parallel and asynchronously to train model weights. Theoretical results typically distinguish between two settings: (i) the homogeneous setting, where all workers have access to the same data distribution, and (ii) the heterogeneous setting, where each worker operates on different data distributions. Known optimal time complexities in these settings reveal a significant gap, with far more pessimistic guarantees in the heterogeneous case. In this work, we investigate whether these pessimistic optimal time complexities can be overcome under different assumptions. Surprisingly, we show that improvement is provably impossible under widely used first- and second-order similarity assumptions for any randomized algorithm. We then turn to the interpolation regime and demonstrate that the weak interpolation assumption alone is also insufficient. Finally, we introduce a minimal combination of irreducible assumptions, strong interpolation and the local Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition, to derive a new time complexity bound that matches the dependence on worker computation times in the best-known result in the homogeneous setting, without requiring identical data distributions.

Related papers

• Ringleader ASGD: The First Asynchronous SGD with Optimal Time Complexity under Data Heterogeneity [51.56484100374058]
  We introduce Ringleader ASGD, the first asynchronous algorithm that attains the theoretical lower bounds for parallel computation.<n>Our analysis further establishes that Ringleader ASGD remains optimal under arbitrary gradient and even time-varying speeds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T19:19:15Z)
• Instance-Optimal Uniformity Testing and Tracking [20.711670932098176]
  We introduce the problem of uniformity tracking, whereby an algorithm is required to detect deviations from uniformity.<n>Our main contribution is a $operatornamepolylog(operatornameopt)$-competitive uniformity tracking algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T17:23:00Z)
• Rademacher learning rates for iterated random functions [0.0]
  We consider the case where the training dataset is generated by an iterated random function that is not necessarily irreducible or aperiodic.<n>Under the assumption that the governing function is contractive with respect to its first argument, we first establish a uniform convergence result for the corresponding sample error.<n>We then demonstrate the learnability of the approximate empirical risk minimization algorithm and derive its learning rate bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T19:36:13Z)
• MindFlayer SGD: Efficient Parallel SGD in the Presence of Heterogeneous and Random Worker Compute Times [49.1574468325115]
  We investigate the problem of minimizing the expectation of smooth non functions in a setting with multiple parallel workers that are able to compute optimal gradients.<n>A challenge in this context is the presence of arbitrarily heterogeneous and distributed compute times.<n>We introduce MindFlayer SGD, a novel parallel SGD method specifically designed to handle this gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T21:11:32Z)
• Generalization error of min-norm interpolators in transfer learning [2.7309692684728617]
  Min-norm interpolators emerge naturally as implicit regularized limits of modern machine learning algorithms. In many applications, a limited amount of test data may be available during training, yet properties of min-norm in this setting are not well-understood. We establish a novel anisotropic local law to achieve these characterizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T02:23:28Z)
• Freya PAGE: First Optimal Time Complexity for Large-Scale Nonconvex Finite-Sum Optimization with Heterogeneous Asynchronous Computations [92.1840862558718]
  In practical distributed systems, workers typically not homogeneous, and can have highly varying processing times. We introduce a new parallel method Freya to handle arbitrarily slow computations. We show that Freya offers significantly improved complexity guarantees compared to all previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T13:33:30Z)
• Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Complementary Composite Minimization [55.26935605535377]
  Inspired by regularization techniques in statistics and machine learning, we study complementary composite minimization. We provide novel excess risk bounds, both in expectation and with high probability. Our algorithms are nearly optimal, which we prove via novel lower complexity bounds for this class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T12:40:24Z)
• Stochastic linear optimization never overfits with quadratically-bounded losses on general data [20.41989568533313]
  This work shows that a diverse collection of linear optimization methods, when run on general data, fail to overfit, despite lacking any explicit constraints or regularization. This analysis is powered by an elementary but flexible proof scheme which can handle many settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T18:12:38Z)
• The Connection between Discrete- and Continuous-Time Descriptions of Gaussian Continuous Processes [60.35125735474386]
  We show that discretizations yielding consistent estimators have the property of invariance under coarse-graining' This result explains why combining differencing schemes for derivatives reconstruction and local-in-time inference approaches does not work for time series analysis of second or higher order differential equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-16T17:11:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.