Agentic Societies Need a Social Harness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17527v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 17:57:27 GMT
• Title: Agentic Societies Need a Social Harness
• Abstract summary: An agentic society is a collection of AI agents that coordinate autonomously across trust boundaries.<n>We show experimentally that honest, competent agents often fail to reach satisfactory outcomes with existing harnesses and messaging primitives.<n>We propose a layered architecture for social harnesses which (i) prevents classes of failures outright, (ii) enables agents to detect invalid messages at runtime, and (iii) supports post-facto investigation and consequences.
• Score: 2.960156090822011
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: An agentic society is a collection of AI agents that coordinate autonomously across trust boundaries, on behalf of different principals whose objectives may only partially align. We show experimentally that in agentic societies even honest, competent agents often fail to reach satisfactory outcomes with existing harnesses and messaging primitives, and that faulty or malicious agents can stall collaboration, influence outcomes, and pursue other harmful goals by exploiting vulnerabilities in communication (``speech''). We argue that agentic societies need a \emph{social harness} for inter-agent interactions, in addition to each agent's \emph{personal harness}, which manages its private context and communication with its principal. We propose a layered architecture for social harnesses which (i) prevents classes of failures outright, (ii) enables agents to detect invalid messages at runtime, and (iii) supports post-facto investigation and consequences, and highlight directions for future research to realize these capabilities.

Related papers

• Tool Use Enables Undetectable Steganography in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [1.0408441549844423]
  Increasingly autonomous agentic AI systems pose novel multi-agent risks, such as secret collusion via covert communication channels.<n>In this paper, we demonstrate that the complexity of these schemes is no longer a safety barrier, as agentic coding models can already produce undetectable stegosystems.<n>We find substantial convergence on broad scheme families but limited strict one-shot coordination, suggesting that shared artefacts, repeated interaction, and tool-mediated search are the settings where covert communication risks are most acute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T19:42:39Z)
• AgentSocialBench: Evaluating Privacy Risks in Human-Centered Agentic Social Networks [2.291770711277359]
  Privacy in agentic social networks is fundamentally harder than in single-agent settings.<n>cross-domain and cross-user coordination creates persistent leakage pressure.<n>Privacy instructions that teach agents how to abstract sensitive information paradoxically cause them to discuss it more.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-01T23:43:23Z)
• Agents of Chaos [50.53354213047402]
  We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment.<n>Twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions.<n>Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:28:48Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• Communication and Verification in LLM Agents towards Collaboration under Information Asymmetry [17.472005826931127]
  This paper studies Large Language Model (LLM) agents in task collaboration.<n>We extend Einstein Puzzles, a symbolic puzzle, to a table-top game.<n> Empirical results highlight the critical importance of aligned communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T15:03:53Z)
• A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures [59.43633341497526]
  Large-Language-Model-driven AI agents have exhibited unprecedented intelligence and adaptability.<n>Agent communication is regarded as a foundational pillar of the future AI ecosystem.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey of agent communication security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T14:44:28Z)
• Preventing Rogue Agents Improves Multi-Agent Collaboration [21.955058255432974]
  We propose to monitor agents during action prediction and intervene when a future error is likely to occur.<n>Experiments on WhoDunitEnv, code generation tasks and the GovSim environment for resource sustainability show that our approach leads to substantial performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T18:35:08Z)
• Challenges in Human-Agent Communication [55.53932430345333]
  We identify and analyze twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose.<n>These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication.<n>Our findings serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T01:21:26Z)
• Mediated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [3.8581550679584473]
  We show how a mediator can be trained alongside agents with policy gradient to maximize social welfare. Our experiments in matrix and iterative games highlight the potential power of applying mediators in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T10:31:37Z)
• CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society [58.04479313658851]
  This paper explores the potential of building scalable techniques to facilitate autonomous cooperation among communicative agents. We propose a novel communicative agent framework named role-playing. Our contributions include introducing a novel communicative agent framework, offering a scalable approach for studying the cooperative behaviors and capabilities of multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T01:09:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.