A Correspondence Analysis Framework for Author-Conference Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.02669v1
• Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 18:52:39 GMT
• Title: A Correspondence Analysis Framework for Author-Conference Recommendations
• Authors: Rahul Radhakrishnan Iyer, Manish Sharma, Vijaya Saradhi
• Abstract summary: We use Correspondence Analysis (CA) to derive appropriate relationships between the entities in question, such as conferences and papers. Our models show promising results when compared with existing methods such as content-based filtering, collaborative filtering and hybrid filtering.
• Score: 2.1055643409860743
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: For many years, achievements and discoveries made by scientists are made aware through research papers published in appropriate journals or conferences. Often, established scientists and especially newbies are caught up in the dilemma of choosing an appropriate conference to get their work through. Every scientific conference and journal is inclined towards a particular field of research and there is a vast multitude of them for any particular field. Choosing an appropriate venue is vital as it helps in reaching out to the right audience and also to further one's chance of getting their paper published. In this work, we address the problem of recommending appropriate conferences to the authors to increase their chances of acceptance. We present three different approaches for the same involving the use of social network of the authors and the content of the paper in the settings of dimensionality reduction and topic modeling. In all these approaches, we apply Correspondence Analysis (CA) to derive appropriate relationships between the entities in question, such as conferences and papers. Our models show promising results when compared with existing methods such as content-based filtering, collaborative filtering and hybrid filtering.

Related papers

• PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers [40.01511301396072]
  PaperWeaver is an enriched paper alerts system that provides contextualized text descriptions of recommended papers based on user-collected papers. Our user study showed that participants using PaperWeaver were able to better understand the relevance of recommended papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T13:10:06Z)
• On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding [71.43634536456844]
  Collusion rings pose a major threat to the peer-review systems of computer science conferences. One approach to solve this problem would be to detect the colluding reviewers from their manipulated bids. No research has yet established that detecting collusion rings is even possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:12:09Z)
• Analyzing the State of Computer Science Research with the DBLP Discovery Dataset [0.0]
  We conduct a scientometric analysis to uncover the implicit patterns hidden in CS metadata. We introduce the CS-Insights system, an interactive web application to analyze CS publications with various dashboards, filters, and visualizations. Both D3 and CS-Insights are open-access, and CS-Insights can be easily adapted to other datasets in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T16:27:42Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• Revise and Resubmit: An Intertextual Model of Text-based Collaboration in Peer Review [52.359007622096684]
  Peer review is a key component of the publishing process in most fields of science. Existing NLP studies focus on the analysis of individual texts. editorial assistance often requires modeling interactions between pairs of texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T16:39:38Z)
• Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design [76.40919326501512]
  We consider the question: how should reviewers be divided between phases or conditions in order to maximize total assignment similarity? We empirically show that across several datasets pertaining to real conference data, dividing reviewers between phases/conditions uniformly at random allows an assignment that is nearly as good as the oracle optimal assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-13T19:29:41Z)
• Ontology-Based Recommendation of Editorial Products [7.1717344176500335]
  Smart Book Recommender (SBR) supports Springer Nature's Computer Science editorial team in selecting the products to market at specific venues. SBR recommends books, journals, and conference proceedings relevant to a conference by taking advantage of a semantically enhanced representation of about 27K editorial products. SBR also allows users to investigate why a certain publication was suggested by the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T23:23:53Z)
• What's New? Summarizing Contributions in Scientific Literature [85.95906677964815]
  We introduce a new task of disentangled paper summarization, which seeks to generate separate summaries for the paper contributions and the context of the work. We extend the S2ORC corpus of academic articles by adding disentangled "contribution" and "context" reference labels. We propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation protocol which reports the relevance, novelty, and disentanglement of generated outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-06T02:23:01Z)
• Topic Space Trajectories: A case study on machine learning literature [0.0]
  We present topic space trajectories, a structure that allows for the comprehensible tracking of research topics. We show the applicability of our approach on a publication corpus spanning 50 years of machine learning research from 32 publication venues. Our novel analysis method may be employed for paper classification, for the prediction of future research topics, and for the recommendation of fitting conferences and journals for submitting unpublished work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-23T10:53:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.