PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02939v2
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 07:59:01 GMT
• Title: PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers
• Authors: Yoonjoo Lee, Hyeonsu B. Kang, Matt Latzke, Juho Kim, Jonathan Bragg, Joseph Chee Chang, Pao Siangliulue,
• Abstract summary: PaperWeaver is an enriched paper alerts system that provides contextualized text descriptions of recommended papers based on user-collected papers. Our user study showed that participants using PaperWeaver were able to better understand the relevance of recommended papers.
• Score: 40.01511301396072
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid growth of scholarly archives, researchers subscribe to "paper alert" systems that periodically provide them with recommendations of recently published papers that are similar to previously collected papers. However, researchers sometimes struggle to make sense of nuanced connections between recommended papers and their own research context, as existing systems only present paper titles and abstracts. To help researchers spot these connections, we present PaperWeaver, an enriched paper alerts system that provides contextualized text descriptions of recommended papers based on user-collected papers. PaperWeaver employs a computational method based on Large Language Models (LLMs) to infer users' research interests from their collected papers, extract context-specific aspects of papers, and compare recommended and collected papers on these aspects. Our user study (N=15) showed that participants using PaperWeaver were able to better understand the relevance of recommended papers and triage them more confidently when compared to a baseline that presented the related work sections from recommended papers.

Related papers

• Temporal Graph Neural Network-Powered Paper Recommendation on Dynamic Citation Networks [4.666226480911492]
  This paper introduces a temporal dimension to paper recommendation strategies. The core idea is to continuously update a paper's embedding when new citation relationships appear. A learnable memory update module based on a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) is utilized to study the evolution of the embedding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T19:10:21Z)
• Explaining Relationships Among Research Papers [14.223038413516685]
  We propose a feature-based, LLM-prompting approach to generate richer citation texts. We find a strong correlation between human preference and integrative writing style, suggesting that humans prefer high-level, abstract citations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T23:38:39Z)
• CausalCite: A Causal Formulation of Paper Citations [80.82622421055734]
  CausalCite is a new way to measure the significance of a paper by assessing the causal impact of the paper on its follow-up papers. It is based on a novel causal inference method, TextMatch, which adapts the traditional matching framework to high-dimensional text embeddings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalCite on various criteria, such as high correlation with paper impact as reported by scientific experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T23:09:39Z)
• Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [57.38537491535016]
  Novel data sources bring new opportunities to improve the quality of recommender systems. Researchers may use impressions to refine user preferences and overcome the current limitations in recommender systems research. We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z)
• QuOTeS: Query-Oriented Technical Summarization [0.2936007114555107]
  We propose QuOTeS, an interactive system designed to retrieve sentences related to a summary of the research from a collection of potential references. QuOTeS integrates techniques from Query-Focused Extractive Summarization and High-Recall Information Retrieval to provide Interactive Query-Focused Summarization of scientific documents. The results show that QuOTeS provides a positive user experience and consistently provides query-focused summaries that are relevant, concise, and complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T18:43:24Z)
• Tag-Aware Document Representation for Research Paper Recommendation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a hybrid approach that leverages deep semantic representation of research papers based on social tags assigned by users. The proposed model is effective in recommending research papers even when the rating data is very sparse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T09:13:07Z)
• Multi-task recommendation system for scientific papers with high-way networks [1.5229257192293197]
  We present a multi-task recommendation system (RS) that predicts a paper recommendation and generates its meta-data such as keywords. The motivation behind this approach is that the paper's topics expressed as keywords are a useful predictor of preferences of researchers. Our application uses Highway networks to train the system very deep, combine the benefits of RNN and CNN to find the most important factor and make latent representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T07:40:47Z)
• iFacetSum: Coreference-based Interactive Faceted Summarization for Multi-Document Exploration [63.272359227081836]
  iFacetSum integrates interactive summarization together with faceted search. Fine-grained facets are automatically produced based on cross-document coreference pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T20:01:11Z)
• CitationIE: Leveraging the Citation Graph for Scientific Information Extraction [89.33938657493765]
  We use the citation graph of referential links between citing and cited papers. We observe a sizable improvement in end-to-end information extraction over the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T03:00:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.