Mining customer product reviews for product development: A summarization
process
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04200v1
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:01:14 GMT
- Title: Mining customer product reviews for product development: A summarization
process
- Authors: Tianjun Hou (LGI), Bernard Yannou (LGI), Yann Leroy, Emilie Poirson
(IRCCyN)
- Abstract summary: This research set out to identify and structure from online reviews the words and expressions related to customers' likes and dislikes to guide product development.
The authors propose a summarization model containing multiples aspects of user preference, such as product affordances, emotions, usage conditions.
A case study demonstrates that with the proposed model and the annotation guidelines, human annotators can structure the online reviews with high inter-agreement.
- Score: 0.7742297876120561
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This research set out to identify and structure from online reviews the words
and expressions related to customers' likes and dislikes to guide product
development. Previous methods were mainly focused on product features. However,
reviewers express their preference not only on product features. In this paper,
based on an extensive literature review in design science, the authors propose
a summarization model containing multiples aspects of user preference, such as
product affordances, emotions, usage conditions. Meanwhile, the linguistic
patterns describing these aspects of preference are discovered and drafted as
annotation guidelines. A case study demonstrates that with the proposed model
and the annotation guidelines, human annotators can structure the online
reviews with high inter-agreement. As high inter-agreement human annotation
results are essential for automatizing the online review summarization process
with the natural language processing, this study provides materials for the
future study of automatization.
Related papers
- Leveraging Large Language Models for Mobile App Review Feature Extraction [4.879919005707447]
This study explores the hypothesis that encoder-only large language models can enhance feature extraction from mobile app reviews.
By leveraging crowdsourced annotations from an industrial context, we redefine feature extraction as a supervised token classification task.
Empirical evaluations demonstrate that this method improves the precision and recall of extracted features and enhances performance efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T07:31:57Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews.
The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised.
This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - Language Models: A Guide for the Perplexed [51.88841610098437]
This tutorial aims to help narrow the gap between those who study language models and those who are intrigued and want to learn more.
We offer a scientific viewpoint that focuses on questions amenable to study through experimentation.
We situate language models as they are today in the context of the research that led to their development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T01:19:02Z) - Analysis of the Evolution of Advanced Transformer-Based Language Models:
Experiments on Opinion Mining [0.5735035463793008]
This paper studies the behaviour of the cutting-edge Transformer-based language models on opinion mining.
Our comparative study shows leads and paves the way for production engineers regarding the approach to focus on.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-07T01:10:50Z) - Towards Personalized Review Summarization by Modeling Historical Reviews
from Customer and Product Separately [59.61932899841944]
Review summarization is a non-trivial task that aims to summarize the main idea of the product review in the E-commerce website.
We propose the Heterogeneous Historical Review aware Review Summarization Model (HHRRS)
We employ a multi-task framework that conducts the review sentiment classification and summarization jointly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T12:32:55Z) - Latent Aspect Detection from Online Unsolicited Customer Reviews [3.622430080512776]
Aspect detection helps product owners and service providers to identify shortcomings and prioritize customers' needs.
Existing methods focus on detecting the surface form of an aspect by training supervised learning methods that fall short when aspects are latent in reviews.
We propose an unsupervised method to extract latent occurrences of aspects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-14T13:46:25Z) - Can Online Customer Reviews Help Design More Sustainable Products? A
Preliminary Study on Amazon Climate Pledge Friendly Products [0.0]
This paper investigates and analyzes Amazon product reviews to bring new light on the following question: What sustainable design insights can be identified or interpreted from online product reviews?''
The top 100 reviews, evenly distributed by star ratings, for three product categories are collected, manually annotated, analyzed and interpreted.
Between 12% and 20% of the reviews mentioned directly or indirectly aspects or attributes that could be exploited to improve the design of these products from a sustainability perspective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T08:57:37Z) - SIFN: A Sentiment-aware Interactive Fusion Network for Review-based Item
Recommendation [48.1799451277808]
We propose a Sentiment-aware Interactive Fusion Network (SIFN) for review-based item recommendation.
We first encode user/item reviews via BERT and propose a light-weighted sentiment learner to extract semantic features of each review.
Then, we propose a sentiment prediction task that guides the sentiment learner to extract sentiment-aware features via explicit sentiment labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-18T08:04:38Z) - Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization [117.70510762845338]
Opinion summarization is the automatic creation of text reflecting subjective information expressed in multiple documents.
In this work, we show that even a handful of summaries is sufficient to bootstrap generation of the summary text.
Our approach substantially outperforms previous extractive and abstractive methods in automatic and human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T15:37:38Z) - A Corpus Study and Annotation Schema for Named Entity Recognition and
Relation Extraction of Business Products [68.26059718611914]
We present a corpus study, an annotation schema and associated guidelines, for the annotation of product entity and company-product relation mentions.
We find that although product mentions are often realized as noun phrases, defining their exact extent is difficult due to high boundary ambiguity.
We present a preliminary corpus of English web and social media documents annotated according to the proposed guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-07T11:45:22Z) - Mining Changes in User Expectation Over Time From Online Reviews [0.7742297876120561]
We propose an approach for capturing changes of user expectation on product affordances based on the online reviews for two generations of products.
First, the approach uses a rule-based natural language processing method to automatically identify and structure product affordances from review text.
Finally, changes of user expectation can be found by applying the conjoint analysis on the online reviews posted for two successive generations of products.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-13T12:57:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.