Scalable and Customizable Benchmark Problems for Many-Objective Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11591v2
• Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:49:59 GMT
• Title: Scalable and Customizable Benchmark Problems for Many-Objective Optimization
• Authors: Ivan Reinaldo Meneghini, Marcos Antonio Alves, Ant\'onio Gaspar-Cunha, Frederico Gadelha Guimar\~aes
• Abstract summary: We propose a parameterized generator of scalable and customizable benchmark problems for many-objective problems (MaOPs) It is able to generate problems that reproduce features present in other benchmarks and also problems with some new features.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Solving many-objective problems (MaOPs) is still a significant challenge in the multi-objective optimization (MOO) field. One way to measure algorithm performance is through the use of benchmark functions (also called test functions or test suites), which are artificial problems with a well-defined mathematical formulation, known solutions and a variety of features and difficulties. In this paper we propose a parameterized generator of scalable and customizable benchmark problems for MaOPs. It is able to generate problems that reproduce features present in other benchmarks and also problems with some new features. We propose here the concept of generative benchmarking, in which one can generate an infinite number of MOO problems, by varying parameters that control specific features that the problem should have: scalability in the number of variables and objectives, bias, deceptiveness, multimodality, robust and non-robust solutions, shape of the Pareto front, and constraints. The proposed Generalized Position-Distance (GPD) tunable benchmark generator uses the position-distance paradigm, a basic approach to building test functions, used in other benchmarks such as Deb, Thiele, Laumanns and Zitzler (DTLZ), Walking Fish Group (WFG) and others. It includes scalable problems in any number of variables and objectives and it presents Pareto fronts with different characteristics. The resulting functions are easy to understand and visualize, easy to implement, fast to compute and their Pareto optimal solutions are known.

Related papers

• UCB-driven Utility Function Search for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning [75.11267478778295]
  In Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) agents are tasked with optimising decision-making behaviours. We focus on the case of linear utility functions parameterised by weight vectors w. We introduce a method based on Upper Confidence Bound to efficiently search for the most promising weight vectors during different stages of the learning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T09:34:42Z)
• GNBG: A Generalized and Configurable Benchmark Generator for Continuous Numerical Optimization [5.635586285644365]
  It is crucial to use a benchmark test suite that encompasses a diverse range of problem instances with various characteristics. Traditional benchmark suites often consist of numerous fixed test functions, making it challenging to align these with specific research objectives. This paper introduces the Generalized Numerical Benchmark Generator (GNBG) for single-objective, box-constrained, continuous numerical optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T09:04:34Z)
• RIGA: A Regret-Based Interactive Genetic Algorithm [14.388696798649658]
  We propose an interactive genetic algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems under preference imprecision. Our algorithm, called RIGA, can be applied to any multi-objective optimization problem provided that the aggregation function is linear in its parameters. For several performance indicators (computation times, gap to optimality and number of queries), RIGA obtains better results than state-of-the-art algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T13:56:15Z)
• Global and Preference-based Optimization with Mixed Variables using Piecewise Affine Surrogates [0.6083861980670925]
  This paper proposes a novel surrogate-based global optimization algorithm to solve linearly constrained mixed-variable problems. We assume the objective function is black-box and expensive-to-evaluate, while the linear constraints are quantifiable unrelaxable a priori known. We introduce two types of exploration functions to efficiently search the feasible domain via mixed-integer linear programming solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-09T15:04:35Z)
• Symmetric Tensor Networks for Generative Modeling and Constrained Combinatorial Optimization [72.41480594026815]
  Constrained optimization problems abound in industry, from portfolio optimization to logistics. One of the major roadblocks in solving these problems is the presence of non-trivial hard constraints which limit the valid search space. In this work, we encode arbitrary integer-valued equality constraints of the form Ax=b, directly into U(1) symmetric networks (TNs) and leverage their applicability as quantum-inspired generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T18:59:54Z)
• Multi-Objective GFlowNets [59.16787189214784]
  We study the problem of generating diverse candidates in the context of Multi-Objective Optimization. In many applications of machine learning such as drug discovery and material design, the goal is to generate candidates which simultaneously optimize a set of potentially conflicting objectives. We propose Multi-Objective GFlowNets (MOGFNs), a novel method for generating diverse optimal solutions, based on GFlowNets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T16:15:36Z)
• A Study of Scalarisation Techniques for Multi-Objective QUBO Solving [0.0]
  Quantum and quantum-inspired optimisation algorithms have shown promising performance when applied to academic benchmarks as well as real-world problems. However, QUBO solvers are single objective solvers. To make them more efficient at solving problems with multiple objectives, a decision on how to convert such multi-objective problems to single-objective problems need to be made.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T14:54:37Z)
• Multi-block-Single-probe Variance Reduced Estimator for Coupled Compositional Optimization [49.58290066287418]
  We propose a novel method named Multi-block-probe Variance Reduced (MSVR) to alleviate the complexity of compositional problems. Our results improve upon prior ones in several aspects, including the order of sample complexities and dependence on strongity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T12:03:26Z)
• Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
  We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems. We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z)
• A Simple Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization [0.0]
  We introduce a steady-state evolutionary algorithm for solving multi-modal, multi-objective optimization problems (MMOPs) We report its performance on 21 MMOPs from various test suites that are widely used for benchmarking using a low computational budget of 1000 function evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T03:31:11Z)
• Offline Model-Based Optimization via Normalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation [101.22379613810881]
  We consider data-driven optimization problems where one must maximize a function given only queries at a fixed set of points. This problem setting emerges in many domains where function evaluation is a complex and expensive process. We propose a tractable approximation that allows us to scale our method to high-capacity neural network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T06:04:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.