Single and Multi-Objective Optimization Benchmark Problems Focusing on Human-Powered Aircraft Design

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08953v4
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 02:53:15 GMT
• Title: Single and Multi-Objective Optimization Benchmark Problems Focusing on Human-Powered Aircraft Design
• Authors: Nobuo Namura,
• Abstract summary: We present a benchmark test suite focused on the design of human-powered aircraft for single and multi-objective optimization.<n>It includes 60 problems across three difficulty levels, with a wing segmentation parameter to scale complexity and dimensionality.<n> Numerical experiments indicate the presence of moderate multimodality, and multi-objective problems exhibit diverse front shapes.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The landscapes of real-world optimization problems can vary strongly depending on the application. In engineering design optimization, objective functions and constraints are often derived from governing equations, resulting in moderate multimodality. However, benchmark problems with such moderate multimodality are typically confined to low-dimensional cases, making it challenging to conduct meaningful comparisons. To address this, we present a benchmark test suite focused on the design of human-powered aircraft for single and multi-objective optimization. This test suite incorporates governing equations from aerodynamics and material mechanics, providing a realistic testing environment. It includes 60 problems across three difficulty levels, with a wing segmentation parameter to scale complexity and dimensionality. Both constrained and unconstrained versions are provided, with penalty methods applied to the unconstrained version. The test suite is computationally inexpensive while retaining key characteristics of engineering problems. Numerical experiments indicate the presence of moderate multimodality, and multi-objective problems exhibit diverse Pareto front shapes.

Related papers

• Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization With Mixed-categorical Design Variables for Expensive-to-evaluate Aeronautical Applications [0.47812237695718757]
  This work aims at developing new methodologies to optimize computational costly complex systems. The proposed surrogate-based method (often called Bayesian optimization) uses adaptive sampling to promote a trade-off between exploration and exploitation. The effectiveness of proposed method was tested on practical aeronautical applications within the context of the European Project AGILE 4.0.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T06:44:13Z)
• Non-Myopic Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization [64.31753000439514]
  We consider the problem of finite-horizon sequential experimental design to solve multi-objective optimization problems. This problem arises in many real-world applications, including materials design. We propose the first set of non-myopic methods for MOO problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T04:05:29Z)
• Metaheuristics for the Template Design Problem: Encoding, Symmetry and Hybridisation [0.0]
  The template design problem (TDP) is a hard problem with a high number of symmetries which makes solving it more complicated. This paper explores and analyses a wide range of metaheuristics to tackle the problem with the aim of assessing their suitability for finding template designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T06:29:12Z)
• Vehicle Suspension Recommendation System: Multi-Fidelity Neural Network-based Mechanism Design Optimization [4.038368925548051]
  Vehicle suspensions are designed to improve driving performance and ride comfort, but different types are available depending on the environment. Traditional design process is multi-step, gradually reducing the number of design candidates while performing costly analyses to meet target performance. Recently, AI models have been used to reduce the computational cost of FEA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T23:54:03Z)
• Optimization-Driven Adaptive Experimentation [7.948144726705323]
  Real-world experiments involve batched & delayed feedback, non-stationarity, multiple objectives & constraints, and (often some) personalization. Tailoring adaptive methods to address these challenges on a per-problem basis is infeasible, and static designs remain the de facto standard. We present a mathematical programming formulation that can flexibly incorporate a wide range of objectives, constraints, and statistical procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:29:09Z)
• Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Benchmarking Transfer Evolutionary Optimization [31.603211545949414]
  This paper pioneers a practical TrEO benchmark suite, integrating problems from the literature categorized based on the three essential aspects of Big Source Task-Instances: volume, variety, and velocity. Our primary objective is to provide a comprehensive analysis of existing TrEO algorithms and pave the way for the development of new approaches to tackle practical challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-20T13:34:46Z)
• Compositional Generative Inverse Design [69.22782875567547]
  Inverse design, where we seek to design input variables in order to optimize an underlying objective function, is an important problem. We show that by instead optimizing over the learned energy function captured by the diffusion model, we can avoid such adversarial examples. In an N-body interaction task and a challenging 2D multi-airfoil design task, we demonstrate that by composing the learned diffusion model at test time, our method allows us to design initial states and boundary shapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T01:33:39Z)
• Multiobjective Evolutionary Component Effect on Algorithm behavior [0.04588028371034406]
  It is unknown what are the most influential components that lead to performance improvements. We apply this methodology to a tuned Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) designed by the iterated racing (irace) configuration package. We compare the impact of the algorithm components in terms of their Search Trajectory Networks (STNs), the diversity of the population, and the anytime hypervolume values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T16:02:56Z)
• MultiZenoTravel: a Tunable Benchmark for Multi-Objective Planning with Known Pareto Front [71.19090689055054]
  Multi-objective AI planning suffers from a lack of benchmarks exhibiting known Pareto Fronts. We propose a tunable benchmark generator, together with a dedicated solver that provably computes the true Pareto front of the resulting instances. We show how to characterize the optimal plans for a constrained version of the problem, and then show how to reduce the general problem to the constrained one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-28T07:09:23Z)
• Numerical Methods for Convex Multistage Stochastic Optimization [86.45244607927732]
  We focus on optimisation programming (SP), Optimal Control (SOC) and Decision Processes (MDP) Recent progress in solving convex multistage Markov problems is based on cutting planes approximations of the cost-to-go functions of dynamic programming equations. Cutting plane type methods can handle multistage problems with a large number of stages, but a relatively smaller number of state (decision) variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T01:30:40Z)
• Automated Circuit Sizing with Multi-objective Optimization based on Differential Evolution and Bayesian Inference [1.1579778934294358]
  We introduce a design optimization method based on Generalized Differential Evolution 3 (GDE3) and Gaussian Processes (GPs) The proposed method is able to perform sizing for complex circuits with a large number of design variables and many conflicting objectives to be optimized. We evaluate the introduced method on two voltage regulators showing different levels of complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T06:48:45Z)
• Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniques [55.492211642128446]
  Designers reportedly struggle with design optimization tasks where they are asked to find a combination of design parameters that maximizes a given set of objectives. Model-based computational design algorithms assist designers by generating design examples during design. Black box methods for assistance, on the other hand, can work with any design problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T20:40:43Z)
• Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimization [82.02008764719896]
  Black-box model-based optimization problems are ubiquitous in a wide range of domains, such as the design of proteins, DNA sequences, aircraft, and robots. We present Design-Bench, a benchmark for offline MBO with a unified evaluation protocol and reference implementations of recent methods. Our benchmark includes a suite of diverse and realistic tasks derived from real-world optimization problems in biology, materials science, and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T05:33:27Z)
• Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding [48.7576911714538]
  Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques to emulate the objective and constraint functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T10:14:39Z)
• Multi-Objective Constrained Optimization for Energy Applications via Tree Ensembles [55.23285485923913]
  Energy systems optimization problems are complex due to strongly non-linear system behavior and multiple competing objectives. In some cases, proposed optimal solutions need to obey explicit input constraints related to physical properties or safety-critical operating conditions. This paper proposes a novel data-driven strategy using tree ensembles for constrained multi-objective optimization of black-box problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T20:18:55Z)
• Batched Data-Driven Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Based on Manifold Interpolation [6.560512252982714]
  We propose a framework for implementing batched data-driven evolutionary multi-objective optimization. It is so general that any off-the-shelf evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms can be applied in a plug-in manner. Our proposed framework is featured with a faster convergence and a stronger resilience to various PF shapes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T23:54:26Z)
• An Overview and Experimental Study of Learning-based Optimization Algorithms for Vehicle Routing Problem [49.04543375851723]
  Vehicle routing problem (VRP) is a typical discrete optimization problem. Many studies consider learning-based optimization algorithms to solve VRP. This paper reviews recent advances in this field and divides relevant approaches into end-to-end approaches and step-by-step approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T02:13:03Z)
• Decentralized Personalized Federated Learning for Min-Max Problems [79.61785798152529]
  This paper is the first to study PFL for saddle point problems encompassing a broader range of optimization problems. We propose new algorithms to address this problem and provide a theoretical analysis of the smooth (strongly) convex-(strongly) concave saddle point problems. Numerical experiments for bilinear problems and neural networks with adversarial noise demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T10:36:25Z)
• An Easy-to-use Real-world Multi-objective Optimization Problem Suite [7.81768535871051]
  We present a multi-objective optimization problem suite consisting of 16 bound-constrained real-world problems. 4 out of the 16 problems are multi-objective mixed-integer optimization problems. We analyze the performance of six representative evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms on the 16 problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T15:11:08Z)
• Scalable Differentiable Physics for Learning and Control [99.4302215142673]
  Differentiable physics is a powerful approach to learning and control problems that involve physical objects and environments. We develop a scalable framework for differentiable physics that can support a large number of objects and their interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T19:07:51Z)
• Scalable and Customizable Benchmark Problems for Many-Objective Optimization [0.0]
  We propose a parameterized generator of scalable and customizable benchmark problems for many-objective problems (MaOPs) It is able to generate problems that reproduce features present in other benchmarks and also problems with some new features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-26T12:39:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.