Policy Gradient based Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01068v2
• Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 19:36:43 GMT
• Title: Policy Gradient based Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
• Authors: Jiahao Yao, Marin Bukov, Lin Lin
• Abstract summary: We show that policy-gradient-based reinforcement learning algorithms are well suited for optimizing the variational parameters of QAOA in a noise-robust fashion. We analyze the performance of the algorithm for quantum state transfer problems in single- and multi-qubit systems.
• Score: 2.5614220901453333
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), as a hybrid quantum/classical algorithm, has received much interest recently. QAOA can also be viewed as a variational ansatz for quantum control. However, its direct application to emergent quantum technology encounters additional physical constraints: (i) the states of the quantum system are not observable; (ii) obtaining the derivatives of the objective function can be computationally expensive or even inaccessible in experiments, and (iii) the values of the objective function may be sensitive to various sources of uncertainty, as is the case for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Taking such constraints into account, we show that policy-gradient-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are well suited for optimizing the variational parameters of QAOA in a noise-robust fashion, opening up the way for developing RL techniques for continuous quantum control. This is advantageous to help mitigate and monitor the potentially unknown sources of errors in modern quantum simulators. We analyze the performance of the algorithm for quantum state transfer problems in single- and multi-qubit systems, subject to various sources of noise such as error terms in the Hamiltonian, or quantum uncertainty in the measurement process. We show that, in noisy setups, it is capable of outperforming state-of-the-art existing optimization algorithms.

Related papers

• Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels [52.47151453259434]
  We show that noise may make quantum kernel methods to only have poor prediction capability, even when the generalization error is small. We provide a crucial warning to employ noisy quantum kernel methods for quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T01:02:16Z)
• Near-Term Distributed Quantum Computation using Mean-Field Corrections and Auxiliary Qubits [77.04894470683776]
  We propose near-term distributed quantum computing that involve limited information transfer and conservative entanglement production. We build upon these concepts to produce an approximate circuit-cutting technique for the fragmented pre-training of variational quantum algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T18:00:00Z)
• Error Analysis of the Variational Quantum Eigensolver Algorithm [0.18188255328029254]
  We study variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) and its individual quantum subroutines. We show through explicit simulation that the VQE algorithm effectively collapses already when single errors occur during a quantum processing call.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T02:02:30Z)
• Synergy Between Quantum Circuits and Tensor Networks: Short-cutting the Race to Practical Quantum Advantage [43.3054117987806]
  We introduce a scalable procedure for harnessing classical computing resources to provide pre-optimized initializations for quantum circuits. We show this method significantly improves the trainability and performance of PQCs on a variety of problems. By demonstrating a means of boosting limited quantum resources using classical computers, our approach illustrates the promise of this synergy between quantum and quantum-inspired models in quantum computing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T15:24:03Z)
• Adiabatic quantum computing with parameterized quantum circuits [0.0]
  We propose a discrete version of adiabatic quantum computing that can be implemented in a near-term device. We compare our proposed algorithm with the Variational Quantum Eigensolver on two classical optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T09:31:57Z)
• Limitations of variational quantum algorithms: a quantum optimal transport approach [11.202435939275675]
  We obtain extremely tight bounds for standard NISQ proposals in both the noisy and noiseless regimes. The bounds limit the performance of both circuit model algorithms, such as QAOA, and also continuous-time algorithms, such as quantum annealing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T13:58:44Z)
• Circuit Symmetry Verification Mitigates Quantum-Domain Impairments [69.33243249411113]
  We propose circuit-oriented symmetry verification that are capable of verifying the commutativity of quantum circuits without the knowledge of the quantum state. In particular, we propose the Fourier-temporal stabilizer (STS) technique, which generalizes the conventional quantum-domain formalism to circuit-oriented stabilizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T21:15:35Z)
• Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics: A performance study on the spin-boson model [68.8204255655161]
  Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics simulations are traditionally based on implementing a Trotter-approximation of the time-evolution operator. variational quantum algorithms have become an indispensable alternative, enabling small-scale simulations on present-day hardware. We show that, despite providing a clear reduction of quantum gate cost, the variational method in its current implementation is unlikely to lead to a quantum advantage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T18:00:05Z)
• Quantum circuit architecture search for variational quantum algorithms [88.71725630554758]
  We propose a resource and runtime efficient scheme termed quantum architecture search (QAS) QAS automatically seeks a near-optimal ansatz to balance benefits and side-effects brought by adding more noisy quantum gates. We implement QAS on both the numerical simulator and real quantum hardware, via the IBM cloud, to accomplish data classification and quantum chemistry tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T12:06:27Z)
• Limitations of optimization algorithms on noisy quantum devices [0.0]
  We present a transparent way of comparing classical algorithms to quantum ones running on near-term quantum devices. Our approach is based on the combination of entropic inequalities that determine how fast the quantum state converges to the fixed point of the noise model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-11T17:07:26Z)
• Minimizing estimation runtime on noisy quantum computers [0.0]
  "engineered likelihood function" (ELF) is used for carrying out Bayesian inference. We show how the ELF formalism enhances the rate of information gain in sampling as the physical hardware transitions from the regime of noisy quantum computers. This technique speeds up a central component of many quantum algorithms, with applications including chemistry, materials, finance, and beyond.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T17:46:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.