Validation and Optimization of Multi-Organ Segmentation on Clinical
Imaging Archives
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.04102v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:49:42 GMT
- Title: Validation and Optimization of Multi-Organ Segmentation on Clinical
Imaging Archives
- Authors: Yuchen Xu, Olivia Tang, Yucheng Tang, Ho Hin Lee, Yunqiang Chen,
Dashan Gao, Shizhong Han, Riqiang Gao, Michael R. Savona, Richard G.
Abramson, Yuankai Huo, Bennett A. Landman
- Abstract summary: A 2015 MICCAI challenge spurred substantial innovation in multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation.
Recent innovations in deep methods have driven performance toward levels for which clinical translation is appealing.
Cross-validation on open datasets presents the risk of indirect knowledge contamination and could result in circular reasoning.
- Score: 7.036733782879497
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Segmentation of abdominal computed tomography(CT) provides spatial context,
morphological properties, and a framework for tissue-specific radiomics to
guide quantitative Radiological assessment. A 2015 MICCAI challenge spurred
substantial innovation in multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation with both
traditional and deep learning methods. Recent innovations in deep methods have
driven performance toward levels for which clinical translation is appealing.
However, continued cross-validation on open datasets presents the risk of
indirect knowledge contamination and could result in circular reasoning.
Moreover, 'real world' segmentations can be challenging due to the wide
variability of abdomen physiology within patients. Herein, we perform two data
retrievals to capture clinically acquired deidentified abdominal CT cohorts
with respect to a recently published variation on 3D U-Net (baseline
algorithm). First, we retrieved 2004 deidentified studies on 476 patients with
diagnosis codes involving spleen abnormalities (cohort A). Second, we retrieved
4313 deidentified studies on 1754 patients without diagnosis codes involving
spleen abnormalities (cohort B). We perform prospective evaluation of the
existing algorithm on both cohorts, yielding 13% and 8% failure rate,
respectively. Then, we identified 51 subjects in cohort A with segmentation
failures and manually corrected the liver and gallbladder labels. We re-trained
the model adding the manual labels, resulting in performance improvement of 9%
and 6% failure rate for the A and B cohorts, respectively. In summary, the
performance of the baseline on the prospective cohorts was similar to that on
previously published datasets. Moreover, adding data from the first cohort
substantively improved performance when evaluated on the second withheld
validation cohort.
Related papers
- Devil is in Details: Locality-Aware 3D Abdominal CT Volume Generation for Self-Supervised Organ Segmentation [5.395145012900144]
Locality-Aware Diffusion (Lad) is a novel method tailored for exquisite 3D abdominal CT volume generation.
We demonstrate remarkable fidelity in reproducing abdominal structures, achieving a decrease in FID score from 0.0034 to 0.0002 on AbdomenCT-1K dataset.
These results underscore the potential of synthetic data to advance self-supervised learning in medical image analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T14:35:53Z) - A Robust Ensemble Algorithm for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: Generalizability and Clinical Utility Beyond the ISLES Challenge [30.611482996378683]
Image and disease variability hinder the development of generalizable AI algorithms with clinical value.
We present a novel ensemble algorithm derived from the 2022 Ischemic Stroke Lesion (ISLES) challenge.
We combined top-performing algorithms into an ensemble model that overcomes the limitations of individual solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-28T13:56:26Z) - Re-identification from histopathology images [0.4154350202907906]
This study demonstrates that even relatively simple deep learning algorithms can re-identify patients in large histopathology datasets with substantial accuracy.
Based on our findings, we formulated a risk assessment scheme to estimate the risk to the patient's privacy prior to publication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T15:15:19Z) - Deep Rib Fracture Instance Segmentation and Classification from CT on
the RibFrac Challenge [66.86170104167608]
The RibFrac Challenge provides a benchmark dataset of over 5,000 rib fractures from 660 CT scans.
During the MICCAI 2020 challenge period, 243 results were evaluated, and seven teams were invited to participate in the challenge summary.
The analysis revealed that several top rib fracture detection solutions achieved performance comparable or even better than human experts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T18:18:33Z) - Kidney abnormality segmentation in thorax-abdomen CT scans [4.173079849880476]
We introduce a deep learning approach for segmenting kidney parenchyma and kidney abnormalities.
Our end-to-end segmentation method was trained on 215 contrast-enhanced thoracic-abdominal CT scans.
Our best-performing model attained Dice scores of 0.965 and 0.947 for segmenting kidney parenchyma in two test sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-06T22:04:07Z) - MyoPS: A Benchmark of Myocardial Pathology Segmentation Combining
Three-Sequence Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images [84.02849948202116]
This work defines a new task of medical image analysis, i.e., to perform myocardial pathology segmentation (MyoPS)
MyoPS combines three-sequence cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, which was first proposed in the MyoPS challenge, in conjunction with MICCAI 2020.
The challenge provided 45 paired and pre-aligned CMR images, allowing algorithms to combine the complementary information from the three CMR sequences for pathology segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-10T06:37:23Z) - Cross-Site Severity Assessment of COVID-19 from CT Images via Domain
Adaptation [64.59521853145368]
Early and accurate severity assessment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on computed tomography (CT) images offers a great help to the estimation of intensive care unit event.
To augment the labeled data and improve the generalization ability of the classification model, it is necessary to aggregate data from multiple sites.
This task faces several challenges including class imbalance between mild and severe infections, domain distribution discrepancy between sites, and presence of heterogeneous features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-08T07:56:51Z) - Dual-Consistency Semi-Supervised Learning with Uncertainty
Quantification for COVID-19 Lesion Segmentation from CT Images [49.1861463923357]
We propose an uncertainty-guided dual-consistency learning network (UDC-Net) for semi-supervised COVID-19 lesion segmentation from CT images.
Our proposed UDC-Net improves the fully supervised method by 6.3% in Dice and outperforms other competitive semi-supervised approaches by significant margins.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T16:23:35Z) - Co-Heterogeneous and Adaptive Segmentation from Multi-Source and
Multi-Phase CT Imaging Data: A Study on Pathological Liver and Lesion
Segmentation [48.504790189796836]
We present a novel segmentation strategy, co-heterogenous and adaptive segmentation (CHASe)
We propose a versatile framework that fuses appearance based semi-supervision, mask based adversarial domain adaptation, and pseudo-labeling.
CHASe can further improve pathological liver mask Dice-Sorensen coefficients by ranges of $4.2% sim 9.4%$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T06:58:39Z) - VerSe: A Vertebrae Labelling and Segmentation Benchmark for
Multi-detector CT Images [121.31355003451152]
Large Scale Vertebrae Challenge (VerSe) was organised in conjunction with the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) in 2019 and 2020.
We present the the results of this evaluation and further investigate the performance-variation at vertebra-level, scan-level, and at different fields-of-view.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-24T21:09:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.