The Fluidity of Concept Representations in Human Brain Signals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.08880v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 17:31:04 GMT
• Title: The Fluidity of Concept Representations in Human Brain Signals
• Authors: Eva Hendrikx (1) and Lisa Beinborn (1) ((1) University of Amsterdam)
• Abstract summary: We analyze the discriminability of concrete and abstract concepts in fMRI data. We argue that fluid concept representations lead to more realistic models of human language processing.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Cognitive theories of human language processing often distinguish between concrete and abstract concepts. In this work, we analyze the discriminability of concrete and abstract concepts in fMRI data using a range of analysis methods. We find that the distinction can be decoded from the signal with an accuracy significantly above chance, but it is not found to be a relevant structuring factor in clustering and relational analyses. From our detailed comparison, we obtain the impression that human concept representations are more fluid than dichotomous categories can capture. We argue that fluid concept representations lead to more realistic models of human language processing because they better capture the ambiguity and underspecification present in natural language use.

Related papers

• Conceptual and Unbiased Reasoning in Language Models [98.90677711523645]
  We propose a novel conceptualization framework that forces models to perform conceptual reasoning on abstract questions. We show that existing large language models fall short on conceptual reasoning, dropping 9% to 28% on various benchmarks. We then discuss how models can improve since high-level abstract reasoning is key to unbiased and generalizable decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T00:53:53Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
  LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge. During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training. These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z)
• Interpretability is in the Mind of the Beholder: A Causal Framework for Human-interpretable Representation Learning [22.201878275784246]
  Focus in Explainable AI is shifting from explanations defined in terms of low-level elements, such as input features, to explanations encoded in terms of interpretable concepts learned from data. How to reliably acquire such concepts is, however, still fundamentally unclear. We propose a mathematical framework for acquiring interpretable representations suitable for both post-hoc explainers and concept-based neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T14:26:20Z)
• A Recursive Bateson-Inspired Model for the Generation of Semantic Formal Concepts from Spatial Sensory Data [77.34726150561087]
  This paper presents a new symbolic-only method for the generation of hierarchical concept structures from complex sensory data. The approach is based on Bateson's notion of difference as the key to the genesis of an idea or a concept. The model is able to produce fairly rich yet human-readable conceptual representations without training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T15:59:13Z)
• Constructing Word-Context-Coupled Space Aligned with Associative Knowledge Relations for Interpretable Language Modeling [0.0]
  The black-box structure of the deep neural network in pre-trained language models seriously limits the interpretability of the language modeling process. A Word-Context-Coupled Space (W2CSpace) is proposed by introducing the alignment processing between uninterpretable neural representation and interpretable statistical logic. Our language model can achieve better performance and highly credible interpretable ability compared to related state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T09:26:02Z)
• Conceptual structure coheres in human cognition but not in large language models [7.405352374343134]
  We show that conceptual structure is robust to differences in culture, language, and method of estimation. Results highlight an important difference between contemporary large language models and human cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T21:27:01Z)
• Discrete representations in neural models of spoken language [56.29049879393466]
  We compare the merits of four commonly used metrics in the context of weakly supervised models of spoken language. We find that the different evaluation metrics can give inconsistent results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T11:02:02Z)
• Is Disentanglement all you need? Comparing Concept-based & Disentanglement Approaches [24.786152654589067]
  We give an overview of concept-based explanations and disentanglement approaches. We show that state-of-the-art approaches from both classes can be data inefficient, sensitive to the specific nature of the classification/regression task, or sensitive to the employed concept representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T15:06:34Z)
• Interpretable Representations in Explainable AI: From Theory to Practice [7.031336702345381]
  Interpretable representations are the backbone of many explainers that target black-box predictive systems. We study properties of interpretable representations that encode presence and absence of human-comprehensible concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-16T21:44:03Z)
• Compositional Explanations of Neurons [52.71742655312625]
  We describe a procedure for explaining neurons in deep representations by identifying compositional logical concepts. We use this procedure to answer several questions on interpretability in models for vision and natural language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T20:37:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.