Self-testing of physical theories, or, is quantum theory optimal with respect to some information-processing task?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00349v5
• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:21:12 GMT
• Title: Self-testing of physical theories, or, is quantum theory optimal with respect to some information-processing task?
• Authors: Mirjam Weilenmann and Roger Colbeck
• Abstract summary: We ask whether there are tasks that can only be performed in theories that have the same correlations as quantum mechanics in any scenario. We present a candidate task for such a correlation self-test and analyse it in a range of generalised probabilistic theories. We show that none of these perform better than quantum theory.
• Score: 1.0878040851638
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Self-testing usually refers to the task of taking a given set of observed correlations that are assumed to arise via a process that is accurately described by quantum theory, and trying to infer the quantum state and measurements. In other words it is concerned with the question of whether we can tell what quantum black-box devices are doing by looking only at their input-output behaviour and is known to be possible in several cases. Here we introduce a more general question: is it possible to self-test a theory, and, in particular, quantum theory? More precisely, we ask whether within a particular causal structure there are tasks that can only be performed in theories that have the same correlations as quantum mechanics in any scenario. We present a candidate task for such a correlation self-test and analyse it in a range of generalised probabilistic theories (GPTs), showing that none of these perform better than quantum theory. A generalisation of our results showing that all non-quantum GPTs are strictly inferior to quantum mechanics for this task would point to a new way to axiomatise quantum theory, and enable an experimental test that simultaneously rules out such GPTs.

Related papers

• An Indeterminacy-based Ontology for Quantum Theory [0.0]
  I present and defend a new ontology for quantum theories (or sinterpretation'' of quantum theory) called Generative Quantum Interpretation (GQT) GQT provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive primitive, without some of their costs. I will argue that GQT should be taken seriously because it provides a series of important benefits that current widely discussed lack, namely, wave function realism and primitive primitive, without some of their costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T17:55:58Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• The Pragmatic QFT Measurement Problem and the need for a Heisenberg-like Cut in QFT [0.0]
  Despite quantum theory's success, many philosophers worry that it lacks some crucial connection between theory and experiment. Without a solution to these pragmatic worries, quantum theory would be at risk of losing both its evidential support and its physical salience. This paper briefly reviews the state of the art in the physics literature regarding the modeling of measurement processes involving quantum fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T15:01:59Z)
• Theory of Quantum Generative Learning Models with Maximum Mean Discrepancy [67.02951777522547]
  We study learnability of quantum circuit Born machines (QCBMs) and quantum generative adversarial networks (QGANs) We first analyze the generalization ability of QCBMs and identify their superiorities when the quantum devices can directly access the target distribution. Next, we prove how the generalization error bound of QGANs depends on the employed Ansatz, the number of qudits, and input states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T08:05:59Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• Testing real quantum theory in an optical quantum network [1.6720048283946962]
  We show that tests in the spirit of a Bell inequality can reveal quantum predictions in entanglement swapping scenarios. We disproving real quantum theory as a universal physical theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-30T05:09:36Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Towards understanding the power of quantum kernels in the NISQ era [79.8341515283403]
  We show that the advantage of quantum kernels is vanished for large size datasets, few number of measurements, and large system noise. Our work provides theoretical guidance of exploring advanced quantum kernels to attain quantum advantages on NISQ devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T02:41:36Z)
• Probing the limits of quantum theory with quantum information at subnuclear scales [0.13844779265721088]
  We propose a new theoretical framework of Q-data tests. It recognises the established validity of quantum theory, but allows for more general -- 'post-quantum' -- scenarios in certain physical regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T16:47:39Z)
• Towards correlation self-testing of quantum theory in the adaptive Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt game [1.0878040851638]
  Correlation self-testing of a theory addresses the question of whether we can identify the set of correlations realisable in a theory from its performance in a particular information processing task. This is the first step towards a general solution that could rule out all theories in which the set of realisable correlations does not coincide with the quantum set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T18:04:13Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.