The Pragmatic QFT Measurement Problem and the need for a Heisenberg-like Cut in QFT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09608v2
• Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:35:22 GMT
• Title: The Pragmatic QFT Measurement Problem and the need for a Heisenberg-like Cut in QFT
• Authors: Daniel Grimmer
• Abstract summary: Despite quantum theory's success, many philosophers worry that it lacks some crucial connection between theory and experiment. Without a solution to these pragmatic worries, quantum theory would be at risk of losing both its evidential support and its physical salience. This paper briefly reviews the state of the art in the physics literature regarding the modeling of measurement processes involving quantum fields.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite quantum theory's remarkable success, many philosophers worry that it nonetheless lacks some crucial connection between theory and experiment. One under-discussed aspect of the Quantum Measurement Problems is that it is sometimes unclear how to model our measurement processes in order to extract experimental predictions. Without a solution to these pragmatic worries, quantum theory would be at risk of losing both its evidential support and its physical salience. Avoiding these risks requires solving the Pragmatic Measurement Problem. For non-relativistic quantum theory, this problem has been solved as follows: One can model each of quantum theory's key experimental successes on a case-by-case in terms of measurement chains and Heisenberg cuts. From here, one can then strive for a wide-scoping measurement theory capable of modeling all (or nearly all) possible measurement processes. Indeed, for non-relativistic quantum theory this leads us to our usual projective measurement theory. But how does this story have to change when we move into the context of quantum field theory (QFT)? It is well known that in QFT almost all localized projective measurements violate causality, allowing for faster-than-light signaling. Despite this, I will argue that we can proceed largely as we did in the non-relativistic case. We first ought to build up a case-by-case measurement framework for QFT by using measurement chains and Heisdenberg-like cuts (where we switch from a QFT model to a non-QFT model). We can then strive for both a new measurement theory for QFT and an empirically meaningful characterization of its observables. It is at this point that significantly more theoretical work is needed. This paper ends by briefly reviewing the state of the art in the physics literature regarding the modeling of measurement processes involving quantum fields.

Related papers

• Table-top nanodiamond interferometer enabling quantum gravity tests [34.82692226532414]
  We present a feasibility study for a table-top nanodiamond-based interferometer. By relying on quantum superpositions of steady massive objects our interferometer may allow exploiting just small-range electromagnetic fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T17:20:59Z)
• Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
  Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM) We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories. We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z)
• Simple Tests of Quantumness Also Certify Qubits [69.96668065491183]
  A test of quantumness is a protocol that allows a classical verifier to certify (only) that a prover is not classical. We show that tests of quantumness that follow a certain template, which captures recent proposals such as (Kalai et al., 2022) can in fact do much more. Namely, the same protocols can be used for certifying a qubit, a building-block that stands at the heart of applications such as certifiable randomness and classical delegation of quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T14:18:17Z)
• Light-shift induced behaviors observed in momentum-space quantum walks [47.187609203210705]
  We present a theoretical model which proves that the coherent dynamics of the spinor condensate is sufficient to explain the experimental data. Our numerical findings are supported by an analytical prediction for the momentum distributions in the limit of zero-temperature condensates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T14:50:05Z)
• Limits on Relativistic Quantum Measurement [0.0]
  Requiring causality on measurements in quantum field theory seems to impose strong conditions on a self-adjoint operator to be really measurable. Recent publications attempt to deal with this issue by including the apparatus into the formalism. I present measurement theory in AQFT, modelling the apparatus as a quantum field with coupling to the measured system restricted to a region of spacetime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T16:47:00Z)
• Ruling out real-valued standard formalism of quantum theory [19.015836913247288]
  A quantum game has been developed to distinguish standard quantum theory from its real-number analog. We experimentally implement the quantum game based on entanglement swapping with a state-of-the-art fidelity of 0.952(1). Our results disprove the real-number formulation and establish the indispensable role of complex numbers in the standard quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T03:56:13Z)
• Observing the fate of the false vacuum with a quantum laboratory [0.0]
  We design and implement a quantum laboratory to experimentally observe and study dynamical processes of quantum field theories. This is the first time it has been possible to experimentally measure instanton processes in a freely chosen quantum field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T18:00:05Z)
• Self-testing of physical theories, or, is quantum theory optimal with respect to some information-processing task? [1.0878040851638]
  We ask whether there are tasks that can only be performed in theories that have the same correlations as quantum mechanics in any scenario. We present a candidate task for such a correlation self-test and analyse it in a range of generalised probabilistic theories. We show that none of these perform better than quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T21:58:10Z)
• Quantum Simulation of Quantum Field Theory in the Light-Front Formulation [0.0]
  Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) describes the structure of hadrons such as the proton at a fundamental level. Uncertainty in the parton distribution function is the dominant source of error in the $W$ mass measurement at the LHC. We show how this can be achieved by using the light-front formulation of quantum field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T18:43:07Z)
• Probing the Universality of Topological Defect Formation in a Quantum Annealer: Kibble-Zurek Mechanism and Beyond [46.39654665163597]
  We report on experimental tests of topological defect formation via the one-dimensional transverse-field Ising model. We find that the quantum simulator results can indeed be explained by the KZM for open-system quantum dynamics with phase-flip errors. This implies that the theoretical predictions of the generalized KZM theory, which assumes isolation from the environment, applies beyond its original scope to an open system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-31T02:55:35Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.